December, 11 2013, 02:06pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
National: Devika Ghai, Pesticide Action Network North America, 415 728 0169, devika@panna.org, (907) 355-0446
Alaska: Heather McCausland, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, heather@akaction.org, Vi Waghiyi, Native Village of Savoonga and Alaska Community on Toxics on harms of Arctic Indigenous Peoples, (907) 222-7714 or (907) 444-9194, vi@akaction.org
California & DC: Paige Tomaselli, Center for Food Safety, (415) 826-2770, PTomaselli@centerforfoodsafety.org
Florida: Jeannie Economos, Farmworker Association of Florida, (407) 886-5151, farmworkerassoc@aol.com
Oregon: Lisa Arkin, Beyond Toxics, 541-465-8860, larkin@beyondtoxics.org Human Rights Expert contact: Dr. Tom Kerns, Environment and Human Rights Advisory, tkerns@u.washington.edu
Â
Groups Call on State Department to Address Human Rights Violations of Global Pesticide Corporations
Urge immediate action to address human rights violations perpetrated by the six largest pesticide and agricultural biotechnology corporations at home and abroad
WASHINGTON
In recognition of International Human Rights Day yesterday, a coalition of farmworker, food, public health, Indigenous Peoples, and environmental health and justice advocates delivered a unique photo-petition to top officials at the U.S. State Department and White House urging them to hold the world's six largest pesticide multi-national corporations accountable for human rights abuses. During the first week in December -- in remembrance of the worst pesticide disaster in world history at Bhopal, India on December 3, 1984 and culminating on December 10, International Human Rights Day -- the groups collected widespread support and pictorial testimonies from people demanding an end to human rights violations by multi-national pesticide companies.
"The world's six largest pesticide corporations have trampled on the rights of people across the world, including in the United States," said Devika Ghai of Pesticide Action Network. "U.S. officials have a responsibility to stand up to powerful corporations and defend the rights of all people to health, life, livelihood and a healthy environment."
The petition -- addressed to Jason Pielemeier of the Business and Human Rights Section at the U.S. Department of State, and Susan Rice, the President's National Security Advisor -- calls upon the US Government to fulfill its obligations to protect human rights from corporate abuse, particularly by the pesticide industry, under the provisions of 'The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights', an international framework that U.S. officials helped draft.
The world's six largest pesticide and GE (genetically engineered) seed corporations - BASF, Bayer, Dow, DuPont, Monsanto and Syngenta - dominate the global marketplace. Together, the "Big 6" control 76% of the global pesticide market and 60% of the global seed market. And the harms caused by their pesticides and market domination are far-reaching.
"Farmworkers here in the Lake Apopka area of Florida were chronically - over decades! -- exposed to the same pesticides that caused reproductive anomalies in the lake's alligators and one of the largest bird mortality incidents in U.S. history on the contaminated Lake Apopka farm lands. Yet, to date, there has been no effort to address the chronic health problems of the people who worked daily in the farm fields while being regularly exposed to these same toxic pesticides. In an effort to garner attention to their concerns, community members created the Lake Apopka Farmworker Memorial Quilt to honor the farmworkers - friends and family members -- who had worked the vegetable fields and who have since passed away. The lack of accountability for the health impacts to the farmworkers - and their second generation children - I call this a human rights violation," said Jeannie Economos, of Farmworker Association of Florida. Many low- income farmworkers also ate fish caught out of Lake Apopka in order to supplement their diet, increasing their body burden of pesticides.
The impacts of the Big 6 pesticide corporations can also be felt in communities across the country. Facing exposure to many of the same pesticides (a very persistent class of pesticides known as organochlorines, the class to which DDT belongs), Indigenous families in Alaska also joined in the photo-petition. Because these persistent pesticides
travel northwards on wind and water currents, they accumulate in traditional food sources; these chemicals have harmed the bodies of Yupik and other Native peoples of Alaska and the Arctic, putting entire communities and ways of life at risk.
"When the simple, sacred act of eating our traditional foods puts us at higher risk of cancer, it's a violation of our human rights. We have a human right to food and subsistence, health, clean air, clean water and toxic free food," said Vi Waghiyi, Native Village of Savoonga tribal member and of Alaska Community Action on Toxics. "The governments and corporations of the world must protect the health and human rights of Indigenous Peoples. The U.S. signed the UN Declaration of the Rights Of Indigenous Peoples. We need to protect the health and well-being of our Indigenous Peoples, our children and future generations who deserve to gain the cultures and traditions passed on for generations from our ancestors."
In 2011, the U.S. Government, as a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council, endorsed 'The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights', an agreement to implement the UN Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework,. This framework lays out state and private sector obligations to protect and respect human rights, and to provide access to remedy when violations do take place.
In the petition delivered today, in recognition of International Human Rights Day, people across the U.S. are calling upon government officials develop a national action plan to implement the Guiding Principles -- and to prioritize pesticide industry violations.
Two years ago, the Big 6 were put on trial in India by the Permanent People's Tribunal for their gross violations of human rights. Over two dozen cases were heard from communities around the world who testified to a range of violations, from direct poisonings to forced child labor to harassment of farmers and facilitation of violent repression. After four days of testimony and deliberation, the jury pronounced the Big 6 guilty of "gross, widespread and systematic violation of human rights."
It is against this backdrop that the coalition, including Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Beyond Toxics, Center for Food Safety, Farmworker Association of Florida, and Pesticide Action Network, along with other partner organizations, delivered the petition to top officials at the State Department and White House today.
LATEST NEWS
Congressional Progressives Unveil 'Bold' Agenda for Second Biden Term
The Congressional Progressive Caucus says its legislative blueprint for 2025 and beyond aims to "deliver equality, justice, and economic security for working people."
Apr 18, 2024
The Congressional Progressive Caucus on Thursday published a "comprehensive domestic policy legislative agenda" for U.S. President Joe Biden's possible second White House term that seeks to "deliver equality, justice, and economic security for working people."
The CPC's Progressive Proposition Agenda is a seven-point plan aimed at lowering the cost of living, boosting wages and worker power, advancing justice, combating climate change and protecting the environment, strengthening democracy, breaking the corporate stranglehold on the economy, and bolstering public education.
"Progressives are proud to have been part of the most significant Democratic legislative accomplishments of this century. We have made real progress for everyday Americans—but there's much more work to be done," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in a statement.
"That's why the Progressive Caucus has identified these popular, populist, and possible solutions," she added. "Democrats in Congress can meet the urgent needs people are facing; rewrite the rules to ensure majorities of this country are no longer barred from the American promise of equality, justice, and economic opportunity; and motivate people with a vision of progressive governance under Democratic majorities in the House and Senate and a Democratic White House."
Progressive lawmakers have already introduced bills for many items on the agenda, including a Green New Deal for Public Schools, expanding the Supreme Court, comprehensive voting rights protection, and legalizing marijuana.
The CPC agenda is backed by a wide range of labor, climate, environmental, civil rights, consumer, faith-based, and other organizations.
"The Congressional Progressive Caucus is leading the way for Congress to address the major issues affecting working families, from reducing healthcare and housing costs to strengthening workers' rights to join unions, earn living wages and benefits, and have safe workplaces," Service Employees International Union president Mary Kay Henry said in a statement.
"SEIU is proud to partner with the CPC to move these priorities forward and build a more equitable economy in which corporations are held accountable for their actions," she added.
Mary Small, chief strategy officer at Indivisible, said: "House progressives were the engine at the heart of our legislative accomplishments in 2021 and 2022. They've continued that momentum to be true governing partners to the Biden administration as those laws and programs are implemented."
"That's why Indivisible is so supportive of the CPC's Proposition Agenda, a bold vision for progressive governance in 2025 and beyond. From reproductive rights to saving our democracy to economic security for all, the CPC is driving forward exactly the sort of legislative goals we want to see in our next governing moment."
That moment is far from guaranteed, with not only the White House hanging in the balance as Biden will all but certainly face former Republican President Donald Trump in November's election but also the Senate Democratic Caucus clinging to a single-seat advantage over the GOP. Republicans currently hold the House of Representatives by a five-seat margin.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'McCarthyism Is Alive and Well': Google Fires 28 for Protesting Israel Contract
"These mass, illegal firings will not stop us," said organizers. "Make no mistake, we will continue organizing until the company drops Project Nimbus and stops powering this genocide."
Apr 18, 2024
The peace coalition No Tech for Apartheid accused Google of a "flagrant act of retaliation" late Wednesday night as the Silicon Valley giant announced it had fired 28 workers over protests against its cloud services contract with the Israeli government.
The firings came after Google organizers held two 10-hour sit-ins at the company's offices in Sunnyvale, California and New York City, demanding the termination of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract under which Google and Amazon provide cloud infrastructure and data services for Israel—without any oversight regarding whether the Israel Defense Forces uses the services in its occupation of Palestinian territories and bombardment of Gaza.
Workers have denounced Project Nimbus since it was announced in 2021, but Israel's killing of at least 33,970 Palestinians in Gaza since October and its intentional starvation of civilians led employees to escalate their protests.
No Tech for Apartheid said in a statement that Google officials called the police to both offices to arrest nine protesters—dubbed the Nimbus Nine—on Tuesday morning, before utilizing "a dragnet of in-office surveillance" to fire nearly two dozen other employees on Wednesday.
"They punished all of the workers they could associate with this action in wholesale firings," said the coalition, which includes Jewish Voice for Peace and MPower Change, a Muslim-led anti-war group.
Google accused the workers of "bullying," "harassment," defacing property, and physically impeding other employees—allegations No Tech for Apartheid rejected as it noted organizers "have yet to hear from a single executive about" their concerns over Google's collaboration with Israel.
"This excuse to avoid confronting us and our concerns directly, and attempt to justify its illegal, retaliatory firings, is a lie," said the workers. "Even the workers who were participating in a peaceful sit-in and refusing to leave did not damage property or threaten other workers. Instead they received an overwhelmingly positive response and shows of support."
The organizers staged the sit-ins on the heels of reporting in Time magazine about new negotiations between Google and the Israeli government regarding further potential tech contracts.
Kate J. Sim, a child safety policy adviser at Google who said she was among those fired this week, said the terminations show "how terrified [executives] are of worker power."
Google employees have a history of harnessing worker power to change policies at the company. In 2018, Google terminated a deal with the U.S. Defense Department to develop drone and artificial intelligence (AI) technology through a contract called Project Maven. The decision followed the resignations of several employees and the condemnation of thousands of workers.
Calling Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian "genocide profiteers," No Tech for Apartheid said Wednesday that they will not stop demonstrating against Project Nimbus until they get a similar result.
"The truth is clear: Google is terrified of us," said the group. "They are terrified of workers coming together and calling for accountability and transparency from our bosses... The corporation is trying to downplay and discredit our power.
"These mass, illegal firings will not stop us," No Tech for Apartheid added. "On the contrary, they only serve as further fuel for the growth of this movement. Make no mistake, we will continue organizing until the company drops Project Nimbus and stops powering this genocide."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular