April, 19 2013, 04:45pm EDT
On Third Anniversary of BP Disaster, the Story That Needs to Be Told
Statement of Allison Fisher, Outreach Director, Public Citizen’s Energy Program
WASHINGTON
Note: A demonstration will be held at 1 p.m. CDT Saturday, April 20, at the Amphitheater at Washington Artillery Park in New Orleans. Demonstrators will spell out the messages of the memorial with their bodies: "11" for the workers we remember, "200" for the miles of coast still polluted by BP's oil. The rally is designed to raise awareness about the urgent need for restoration and to hold BP accountable for the damages incurred. The event will be made into a short video and distributed online to raise awareness about the ongoing BP oil disaster.
On the third anniversary of the BP oil disaster, the oil giant wants people to believe that no company has done more to respond in the wake of an industrial accident than BP.
That is the story BP wants told.
On Monday, the corporation released a memo directed at reporters covering the anniversary. The document touts BP's financial commitment to the Gulf region and encourages reporters to "note that tourism numbers from the Florida Panhandle to the Texas Gulf Coast are smashing records."
In addition to hyping the region's rebounding tourist industry, which BP, in part, attributes to its advertising campaign that promotes tourism across the entire Gulf Coast, the corporation highlights what it has expended in its clean-up and restoration efforts and in legitimate claims and settlement agreements.
But on the third anniversary of the worst offshore drilling tragedy in U.S. history, this is the story that needs to be told:
First, BP should not be patting itself on the back for doing what is legally required of the corporation as the entity responsible for the oil spill disaster.
Second, the corporation is clearly cherry-picking to paint a rosy picture of the region's recovery. Oil is still washing up on Gulf Coast beaches, the long-term effects to the region are still unknown and many residents of the area are experiencing severe health issues related to clean-up and containment efforts. These residents include those exposed to the toxic dispersant, Corexit; the corporation admitted to using at least 1.9 million gallons of the widely banned dispersant in its efforts to "dissolve" the oil.
Meanwhile, in the courtroom, BP still is not taking full responsibility for the disaster, which has consequences for restoration efforts. The first phase of the Gulf oil disaster trial, intended to identify the causes of the blowout of BP's Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico and assign fault to the companies, concluded on April 17. During the trial, the corporation fiercely denied it was grossly negligent, as it was attempting to dodge full liability for its Clean Water Act violations. A judgment of negligence - as opposed to gross negligence - would mean the region would lose billions of dollars in restoration funding.
And earlier this month, a federal judge rejected, for a second time, BP's attempt to block the Deepwater Horizon claims administrator from awarding what could be billions of dollars in payments for business economic losses. BP is challenging the ruling again in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Last, in its recent press memo, BP fails to discuss whether the corporation has responded to the managerial and operational failures that contributed to the accident. Response in the wake of an industrial accident is not just about paying fines and cleaning up the mess you made; it's about cleaning your house to ensure such a disaster doesn't happen again.
BP's abysmal record of environmental and worker safety violations demonstrates that the company has done little in the past to respond to its failed safety culture, what a Department of Justice official called "a culture of privileging profit over prudence." In addition to the ongoing oil spill case, BP also is in a legal battle with the California Attorney General's office, which has filed a lawsuit against BP claiming that since October 2006, BP has "tampered with or disabled leak detection devices, and failed to test secondary containment systems, conduct monthly inspections, train employees in proper protocol, and maintain operational alarm systems, among other violations." And more recently, a lawsuit was filed by residents in Galveston County, Texas, claiming that BP knowingly released highly toxic chemicals for 15 consecutive days in November 2011 from its Texas City oil refinery, inflicting permanent environmental and health damages upon the local community.
BP keeps saying that it plans to make the region whole. In fact, the company is just trying to make its bottom line whole.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000LATEST NEWS
AOC Blasts AIPAC as 'The NRA of Foreign Policy'
The New York Democrat was among lawmakers and others calling out the pro-Israel lobby group as it advocated against a cease-fire in the Gaza Strip.
Feb 21, 2024
As the American Israel Public Affairs Committee took aim at Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other progressive lawmakers critical of U.S. support for Israel's war on the Gaza Strip, the New York Democrat compared the lobby group to the National Rifle Association.
After a CNN journalist noted on social media that an Israeli group submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) a report on sexual violence allegedly committed during the Hamas-led October 7 attack on Israel, AIPAC claimed that "a cease-fire now keeps these rapist monsters armed and in power in Gaza," and mentioned multiple members of Congress, including Ocasio-Cortez.
The New York Democrat responded that "it is appalling that AIPAC is targeting women members of Congress who have survived sexual assault with this horrific rhetoric. Each and every day, their role in U.S. politics becomes a greater scandal. They are the NRA of foreign policy. Of course they don't want a cease-fire."
The other lawmakers targeted by AIPAC were Democratic Reps. Jamaal Bowman (N.Y.), Cori Bush (Mo.), Pramila Jayapal (Wash.), Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Mark Pocan (Wis.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), the only Palestinian American in Congress.
"I'm starting to think that AIPAC isn't just a puppet of [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, but a partner," said Pocan. "They cover for his murdering of innocents in the course of supposedly going after Hamas and those actions aren't getting hostages released. They seem fine with that and don't mind the killing of kids."
In less than five months, Israel's blockade and bombardment of Gaza have killed at least 29,313 Palestinians and devastated civilian infrastructure, displacing the vast majority of the Hamas-governed enclave's 2.3 million residents.
Before October 7, the United States already gave Israel nearly $4 billion in annual military aid. The Biden administration has responded to the war by seeking a package worth over $14 billion, bypassing federal lawmakers to arm Israeli forces, and defending Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories at the ICJ on Wednesday.
AIPAC, meanwhile, has worked to oust progressive members of Congress in the November election. The group is also fighting growing global allegations that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and demands for a cease-fire deal that would free hostages taken on October 7 as well as Palestinians imprisoned in Israel.
"A cease-fire means Palestinians will not be slaughtered by Israel every day. A cease-fire means medicine and food. A cease-fire means hostages come home," Jewish Voice for Peace political director Beth Miller said of the group's social media post. "AIPAC wants a total genocide of Palestinians, with full funding from the U.S. AIPAC wants death and destruction. That's it."
Organizer Melissa Byrne accused AIPAC of "exploiting sexual violence to keep a war going," adding that the group "prefers war to freeing the hostages and security for Israel and Palestine."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Anti-Migrant Directives Under Consideration by Biden Slammed as 'Trump Policy'
"People seek asylum because they fear for their lives. President Biden would be making a grave mistake if he moves forward with this policy," said Rep. Chuy García.
Feb 21, 2024
Immigration rights advocates on Wednesday condemned President Joe Biden's reported consideration of a series of anti-migrant actions, including invoking an executive authority used by the Trump administration to make it more difficult for people to seek asylum in the United States.
According to reports, Biden is considering acting without Congress in an election year bid to stem the flow of undocumented migrants at the southern U.S. border.
"This would be an extremely disappointing mistake. Cruel enforcement-only policies have been tried for 30 years and simply do not work," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in response to the reporting.
"Democrats cannot continue to take pages out of Donald Trump and Stephen Miller's playbook—we need to lead with dignity and humanity," she added, referring to the former U.S. president and 2024 GOP front-runner and his xenophobic senior immigration adviser.
As Politicoreported:
Among the ideas under discussion include using a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar migrants from seeking asylum in between U.S. ports of entry. The administration is also discussing tying that directive to a trigger—meaning that it would only come into effect after a certain number of illegal crossings took place, said the three people, who were granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations.
A trigger mechanism was part of a bipartisan Senate border deal that never reached the floor earlier this month. During the deal's construction... Biden repeatedly said it would have given him the authority to "shut down" the border.
The White House is also reportedly considering invoking Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which empowers the president to ban entry to noncitizens who are deemed "detrimental to the interests of the United States." Trump repeatedly tried to use Section 212(f) as his administration pursued draconian anti-migrant measures. However, three levels of the federal judiciary, including the U.S. Supreme Court, blocked him from doing so.
The White House would not comment on the reports, but spokesperson Angelo Fernández Hernández said that the Biden administration "spent months negotiating in good faith to deliver the toughest and fairest bipartisan border security bill in decades because we need Congress to make significant policy reforms and to provide additional funding to secure our border and fix our broken immigration system."
"No executive action, no matter how aggressive, can deliver the significant policy reforms and additional resources Congress can provide and that Republicans rejected," he added, calling on House Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republicans to "pass the bipartisan deal to secure the border."
In addition to expanding Title 42—a provision first invoked by the Trump administration at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic—to expel more than 1 million migrants under the guise of public safety, Biden also forced migrants to prove that they previously sought asylum in a third country before applying for U.S. protection.
"The cruel measures being proposed collectively create a government-mandated asylum ban."
The Biden administration also required asylum-seekers to schedule an appointment using an app that connects them to Customs and Border Protection instead of attempting to cross the border. Asylum-seekers often did not have internet access, and the app was riddled with glitches.
Title 42 ended last May, and a federal judge blocked some of Biden's other anti-migrant policies in July.
"What is needed now more than ever from the Biden administration is to ensure that any border security executive actions protect due process for asylum-seekers and provide resources for a fair, efficient, and humane asylum system," Murad Awawdeh, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition, said in a statement on Wednesday.
"The cruel measures being proposed collectively create a government-mandated asylum ban, which even border officials contend will only create more chaos at the southern border, while failing to address the real issue at hand," he added. "We call on the Biden administration to abandon this cruel proposed plan and immediately invest in strategic, humane actions that will help secure our border and provide fair treatment for asylum-seekers."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Alabama University Pauses IVF Treatments After Court Rules Embryos Are 'Children'
"This cruel ruling, and the subsequent decision by UAB's health system, are horrifying signals of what's to come across the country," warned the head of one infertility group.
Feb 21, 2024
Alabama's leading medical school said Wednesday that it has paused in vitro fertilization procedures due to fear of prosecution after the state's highest court ruled that frozen embryos are "children."
"We must evaluate the potential that our patients and our physicians could be prosecuted criminally or face punitive damages for following the standard of care for IVF treatments," University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) spokesperson Hannah Echols toldAL.com, adding that she is "saddened" for patients seeking the treatment.
"Alabamans in the midst of seeking treatment have had their lives and their hopes and dreams crushed."
UAB's move follows Friday's
theology-ridden ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court that embryos are "extrauterine children." Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Parker—who espoused Christian fundamentalist control of U.S. society during a recent interview with a QAnon conspiracy theorist—wrote in the ruling that "human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God."
Barbara Collura, president and CEO of RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, said in a statement that the organization is "absolutely heartbroken for the Alabama family building community."
"The University of Alabama at Birmingham health system—the largest healthcare system in the state—has been forced to make an impossible decision: Pause IVF procedures for those hoping to build their families, or put their patients and doctors at risk of prosecution," she added.
As AL.com's Amy Yurkanin explained:
There are many reasons families turn to IVF treatment. Some women may have blocked fallopian tubes that won't allow fertilized eggs to travel to the uterus. In other cases, families can carry genes that cause fatal diseases and may want to create embryos that can be tested. In those cases, families will transfer healthy embryos and may discard or donate those that carry genetic diseases.
"There are hundreds, if not thousands, of people who are right now in the middle of a physically and emotionally challenging medical process to fulfill their dream of a baby," Collura said. "Would-be parents have invested their hearts, time, and resources. Now, less than a week after the Alabama Supreme Court's devastating ruling, Alabamans in the midst of seeking treatment have had their lives and their hopes and dreams crushed."
"This cruel ruling, and the subsequent decision by UAB's health system, are horrifying signals of what's to come across the country," she added. "We will continue to fight to maintain and increase access to care for the 1 in 6 adults nationwide who struggle with infertility."
Calling the Alabama ruling "so deeply fucked up," HuffPost senior politics reporter Jennifer Bendery noted that former U.S. President Donald Trump, the 2024 GOP front-runner, "spent years putting people forward for lifetime federal judgeships who had grave concerns with fertility treatments like IVF and then Senate Republicans confirmed them."
"Anyone who knows about IVF treatments knows how financially and emotionally exhaustive this process can be," Bendery added. "And that it might not even work, after years of this. I feel for these Alabama women being turned away now as they're already going through this."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular