BP Settlement With Government May Follow Pattern of Allowing Companies to Write Off Costs of Wrongdoing

For Immediate Release

Contact: 

Phone: (202) 546-9707

BP Settlement With Government May Follow Pattern of Allowing Companies to Write Off Costs of Wrongdoing

Group Calls on Justice Dept to Promise No Tax Deductions for Oil Spills

WASHINGTON - A new white paper released today by U.S. PIRG examines a persistent pattern of companies that sign settlements with the government for their wrongdoing, then deduct the settlement costs as a normal business expense on their taxes. The white paper comes as the nation anticipates a multi-billion dollar settlement announcement between BP and the federal government for the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Department of Justice has refused to comment on whether a settlement with BP would allow the company to write off their settlement expenses on their taxes. Most past government settlement agreements have failed to prevent companies from taking this tax deduction, but there is precedent for the alternative. For example, in 2010 a Securities and Exchange Commission settlement with Goldman Sachs stipulated that the company could not deduct the settlement payments on its taxes.

“The standard practice of allowing companies to write off their settlement expenses represents a significant and largely invisible subsidy for corporate wrongdoing. When a company makes payments because it created an oil spill, a mortgage meltdown, or products that kill people, it shouldn’t turn around and treat those payments as a normal business expense. When companies deduct settlement costs, it adds insult to public injury. Taxpayers end up picking up the tab for the lost revenue,” said Phineas Baxandall, Senior Analyst for Tax & Budget Policy at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

Congress has long established that fines and penalties should not be tax-deductible because those payments are meant to serve as punishment and deterrent for wrongdoing. Settlement costs, on the other hand, are routinely written off as a normal cost of doing business unless tax-deductibility is explicitly forbidden. However, in cases such as the BP spill where extensive investigation has found the company has committed wrongdoing, allowing such a tax deduction seems inappropriate and only lessens the effectiveness of the settlement agreement as a penalty and as a deterrent to future wrongdoing. BP has already reduced its tax bills by approximately $10 billion by writing off other payments related to the oil spill.

The white paper released today details over 100 large corporate settlements. In most cases, no information is readily available as to which companies deducted these costs from their taxes.

In a recent letter from Chris Jones, whose brother Gordon Jones died in the Deepwater Horizon explosion that set off the Gulf spill, Jones writes that, “BP is telling us, through its claim of millions of dollars in tax credits, that Gordon and his fellow co-workers are merely business casualties that entitle BP to offset its losses.”

A copy of the white paper can be downloaded at http://uspirg.org/reports/usp/rogues-gallery-major-corporate-legal-settl...

###

U.S. PIRG, the federation of state Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs), stands up to powerful special interests on behalf of the American public, working to win concrete results for our health and our well-being. With a strong network of researchers, advocates, organizers and students in state capitols across the country, we take on the special interests on issues, such as product safety,political corruption, prescription drugs and voting rights,where these interests stand in the way of reform and progress.

Share This Article

More in: