EMAIL SIGN UP!
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA)
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
Contraception Controversy Would Be Irrelevant with National Health Care
WASHINGTON - March 2 - AP reports: “In an election year battle mixing birth control, religion and politics, Democrats narrowly blocked an effort by Senate Republicans to overturn President Barack Obama’s order that most employers or their insurers cover the cost of contraceptives.”
CLARK NEWHALL, clark.newhall at health-justice.org,
Executive director of Health Justice, Newhall is a doctor and a lawyer. He said today: “What a stupid argument we’re having. If we had national health care, a single-payer program, that would make this irrelevant. Everyone would have health care and it doesn’t matter what your employer thinks. It would be your health care, not the business or your employer or anyone else.”
See MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell commentary: “With single payer, we wouldn’t be in this mess.”
The point was also made in a recent letter in the Chicago Tribune:
“I would like to point out that the recent controversy over employers’ religious views and employees’ health coverage would never have happened if our country had a universal coverage, single-payer health care system.
“That’s because, under single-payer, employers would no longer have to have any involvement in their employees’ health insurance.
“An employer’s religious affiliation or moral beliefs would be a non-issue.
“Under single-payer, everyone would have the same health coverage, regardless of whom they worked for.
“And under single-payer, losing one’s job would no longer mean losing one’s health insurance.
“Something to think about.”
– Dr. Thomas M. Duffy, Northbrook