January, 11 2012, 11:08am EDT
Keystone XL Pipeline: How Much Would 'Huge Political Consequences' From the Oil & Gas Industry Cost?
WASHINGTON
Last week, the head of the American Petroleum Institute, Jack Gerard, delivered a message to President Obama: approve the Keystone XL pipeline or face "huge political consequences." As the president of an energy trade association that bills itself as the only national trade association representing all aspects of America's oil and natural gas industry, Gerard could possess the clout to make good on his threat. In a recent two-year time frame, contributions to current members of the House of Representatives from individuals and PACs connected to the Oil & Gas industry have totaled nearly $12 million.
The decision on the Keystone pipeline has placed the White House between high-contributing environmental policy groups that oppose the creation of the pipeline and sagging poll numbers tied to a troubled economy that would benefit from the creation of new construction projects.
As of now, House Republicans have only been successful in forcing a decision, but not in determining the outcome. On July 26, 2011 the House of Representatives passed HR 1938, a bill that would direct the President to expedite the consideration and approval of the construction and operation of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, but the measure died in the Senate. However, as part of the payroll tax package signed into law, the White House will ultimately be required to make a decision on whether to approve the pipeline by Feb. 21, 2012. In the event that anyone forgets how long the President has had since the clock started ticking, the House Energy and Commerce Committee has provided one.
- Of the 118 House members who have the Oil & Gas Industry amongst their top 10 contributing industry groups, only two representatives ( Edward Markey and Charles Bass) voted against the deadline on the Keystone pipeline decision imposed in HR 1938.
- Amongst the 195 House members who have the Oil & Gas industry amongst their top 20 contributing interest groups, only 10 voted against the deadline imposed in HR 1938.
Below is a contribution analysis compiled by MapLight revealing which lawmakers' campaign coffers would suffer the most from a retreat by interests connected to the Oil & Gas industry and, for reference, how those lawmakers voted on HR 1938. The first column in the table represents where the Oil & Gas industry ranks compared to other contributing industries. Contributions from political parties and from other candidates are not included in MapLight's "Top 10" lists.
Click here to download a spreadsheet with contributions from Oil & Gas to all current members of the House of Representatives (July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2011) and Senate (July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2011). The spreadsheet also includes contributions connected to Environmental protection interest groups.
Rank of Oil & Gas as a Contributing Interest Group | Name | Vote on HR 1938 | Total (July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2011) |
---|---|---|---|
1st | Rep. Steven Pearce [R, NM-2] | AYE | $370,020 |
Rep. Mike Pompeo [R, KS-4] | AYE | $333,156 | |
Rep. Bill Flores [R, TX-17] | AYE | $266,184 | |
Rep. Cory Gardner [R, CO-4] | AYE | $205,124 | |
Rep. Dan Boren [D, OK-2] | AYE | $201,800 | |
Rep. John Sullivan [R, OK-1] | AYE | $179,200 | |
Rep. Jeff Landry [R, LA-3] | AYE | $176,050 | |
Rep. Tim Griffin [R, AR-2] | AYE | $164,709 | |
Rep. James Lankford [R, OK-5] | AYE | $156,760 | |
Rep. Rick Berg [R, ND-0] | AYE | $151,561 | |
Rep. Michael Conaway [R, TX-11] | AYE | $136,850 | |
Rep. Tim Murphy [R, PA-18] | AYE | $133,700 | |
Rep. Dennis Rehberg [R, MT-0] | AYE | $133,152 | |
Rep. Steve Scalise [R, LA-1] | AYE | $125,335 | |
Rep. Francisco Canseco [R, TX-23] | AYE | $121,767 | |
Rep. Pete Olson [R, TX-22] | AYE | $106,400 | |
Rep. Tom Cole [R, OK-4] | AYE | $103,400 | |
Rep. Cynthia Lummis [R, WY-0] | AYE | $97,750 | |
Rep. Doc Hastings [R, WA-4] | AYE | $97,171 | |
Rep. Kevin Brady [R, TX-8] | AYE | $94,900 | |
Rep. John Culberson [R, TX-7] | AYE | $91,550 | |
Rep. Kay Granger [R, TX-12] | AYE | $79,850 | |
Rep. Ted Poe [R, TX-2] | AYE | $79,700 | |
Rep. Glenn Thompson [R, PA-5] | AYE | $73,600 | |
Rep. William Thornberry [R, TX-13] | AYE | $68,425 | |
Rep. Blake Farenthold [R, TX-27] | AYE | $67,600 | |
Rep. Mike Coffman [R, CO-6] | AYE | $61,250 | |
Rep. Ralph Hall [R, TX-4] | AYE | $55,208 | |
Rep. Doug Lamborn [R, CO-5] | AYE | $39,750 | |
Rep. Rob Bishop [R, UT-1] | AYE | $21,750 | |
2nd | Rep. John Fleming [R, LA-4] | AYE | $203,400 |
Rep. Mike Ross [D, AR-4] | AYE | $141,450 | |
Rep. Bob Gibbs [R, OH-18] | AYE | $78,800 | |
Rep. Bill Cassidy [R, LA-6] | AYE | $77,000 | |
Rep. Scott Tipton [R, CO-3] | AYE | $66,250 | |
Rep. Gregg Harper [R, MS-3] | AYE | $54,250 | |
Rep. Todd Platts [R, PA-19] | AYE | $6,400 | |
3rd | Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6] | AYE | $137,270 |
Rep. Charles Boustany [R, LA-7] | AYE | $126,050 | |
Rep. Stephen Fincher [R, TN-8] | AYE | $98,050 | |
Rep. Jim Matheson [D, UT-2] | AYE | $90,550 | |
Rep. Jim Costa [D, CA-20] | AYE | $79,650 | |
Rep. Lynn Jenkins [R, KS-2] | AYE | $73,250 | |
Rep. Tim Huelskamp [R, KS-1] | AYE | $64,846 | |
Rep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10] | AYE | $63,850 | |
Rep. Raymond Green [D, TX-29] | AYE | $62,700 | |
Rep. Michael Burgess [R, TX-26] | AYE | $62,150 | |
Rep. Dan Benishek [R, MI-1] | AYE | $47,750 | |
Rep. Louis Gohmert [R, TX-1] | AYE | $43,150 | |
Rep. Lou Barletta [R, PA-11] | AYE | $40,525 | |
Rep. Morgan Griffith [R, VA-9] | AYE | $35,150 | |
Rep. Tom McClintock [R, CA-4] | AYE | $18,600 | |
4th | Rep. Frederick Upton [R, MI-6] | AYE | $120,700 |
Rep. Marsha Blackburn [R, TN-7] | AYE | $82,750 | |
Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12] | AYE | $80,300 | |
Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19] | AYE | $80,250 | |
Rep. Frank Lucas [R, OK-3] | AYE | $77,250 | |
Rep. Alan Nunnelee [R, MS-1] | AYE | $74,550 | |
Rep. David McKinley [R, WV-1] | AYE | $62,250 | |
Rep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3] | AYE | $61,700 | |
Rep. Edward Whitfield [R, KY-1] | AYE | $55,500 | |
Rep. Darrell Issa [R, CA-49] | AYE | $54,500 | |
Rep. Rick Crawford [R, AR-1] | AYE | $38,922 | |
Rep. Paul Broun [R, GA-10] | AYE | $28,700 | |
5th | Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R, CA-22] | AYE | $156,100 |
Rep. Rodney Alexander [R, LA-5] | AYE | $64,146 | |
Rep. Todd Young [R, IN-9] | AYE | $47,150 | |
Rep. William Shuster [R, PA-9] | AYE | $46,250 | |
Rep. Donald Young [R, AK-0] | AYE | $37,550 | |
Rep. Bill Johnson [R, OH-6] | AYE | $16,750 | |
6th | Rep. Peter Sessions [R, TX-32] | AYE | $90,950 |
Rep. Mike Pence [R, IN-6] | AYE | $68,400 | |
Rep. Shelley Capito [R, WV-2] | AYE | $60,750 | |
Rep. Lee Terry [R, NE-2] | AYE | $58,150 | |
Rep. Devin Nunes [R, CA-21] | AYE | $50,250 | |
Rep. Adam Kinzinger [R, IL-11] | AYE | $45,400 | |
Rep. Geoff Davis [R, KY-4] | AYE | $42,750 | |
Rep. John Carter [R, TX-31] | NV | $40,050 | |
Rep. Larry Bucshon [R, IN-8] | AYE | $30,200 | |
7th | Rep. Kevin Yoder [R, KS-3] | AYE | $79,550 |
Rep. Lamar Smith [R, TX-21] | AYE | $56,000 | |
Rep. Randy Neugebauer [R, TX-19] | AYE | $47,200 | |
Rep. Joe Heck [R, NV-3] | AYE | $41,500 | |
Rep. Diane Black [R, TN-6] | AYE | $40,550 | |
Rep. Charles Gonzalez [D, TX-20] | AYE | $31,250 | |
Rep. Michael Simpson [R, ID-2] | AYE | $31,200 | |
Rep. Jeff Duncan [R, SC-3] | AYE | $25,000 | |
Rep. Kenny Marchant [R, TX-24] | AYE | $23,900 | |
Rep. Steve Womack [R, AR-3] | AYE | $20,219 | |
Rep. Mike Kelly [R, PA-3] | AYE | $18,750 | |
8th | Rep. Greg Walden [R, OR-2] | AYE | $78,100 |
Rep. Jeb Hensarling [R, TX-5] | AYE | $72,300 | |
Rep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15] | AYE | $56,950 | |
Rep. Timothy Walberg [R, MI-7] | AYE | $38,150 | |
Rep. Brett Guthrie [R, KY-2] | AYE | $28,400 | |
Rep. Al Green [D, TX-9] | AYE | $16,900 | |
9th | Rep. Michele Bachmann [R, MN-6] | NV | $78,420 |
Rep. Scott Garrett [R, NJ-5] | AYE | $42,400 | |
Rep. Spencer Bachus [R, AL-6] | AYE | $42,000 | |
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers [R, WA-5] | AYE | $36,850 | |
Rep. Steven Chabot [R, OH-1] | AYE | $36,700 | |
Rep. Tom Reed [R, NY-29] | AYE | $32,250 | |
Rep. John Gingrey [R, GA-11] | AYE | $27,500 | |
Rep. Samuel Johnson [R, TX-3] | AYE | $26,100 | |
Rep. Joseph Pitts [R, PA-16] | AYE | $25,000 | |
Rep. Sue Myrick [R, NC-9] | AYE | $24,500 | |
Rep. Trey Gowdy [R, SC-4] | AYE | $18,250 | |
10th | Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7] | AYE | $144,650 |
Rep. Paul Ryan [R, WI-1] | AYE | $57,000 | |
Rep. Kristi Noem [R, SD-0] | AYE | $50,900 | |
Rep. Jeff Denham [R, CA-19] | AYE | $33,900 | |
Rep. Edward Markey [D, MA-7] | NOE | $32,250 | |
Rep. Vicky Hartzler [R, MO-4] | AYE | $30,600 | |
Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler [R, WA-3] | AYE | $29,600 | |
Rep. Charles Bass [R, NH-2] | NOE | $28,850 | |
Rep. Henry Cuellar [D, TX-28] | AYE | $26,300 | |
Rep. Jason Chaffetz [R, UT-3] | AYE | $26,000 | |
Rep. Tom Graves [R, GA-9] | AYE | $25,500 |
METHODOLOGY: MapLight analysis of campaign contributions to current members of the U.S. House of Representatives from the Oil & Gas industry, July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2011. Campaign contribution figures and industry classification provided by OpenSecrets.org. Top 10 contributing industry groups calculated by MapLight. Contributions from political parties and from other candidates are not included in MapLight's "Top 10" lists.
If you would like to see further analysis of this data please don't hesitate to contact us, 415-299-0898.
A link to this data release can be found here.
MapLight is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization that reveals money's influence on politics.
LATEST NEWS
USAID Chief Admits Famine Is Underway in Gaza as US Keeps Arming Israel
"In northern Gaza, the rate of malnutrition prior to October 7th was almost zero, and it is now one in three—one in three kids," said Samantha Power.
Apr 11, 2024
The head of the U.S. Agency for International Development admitted during congressional testimony on Wednesday that famine is already underway in the Gaza Strip, publicly confirming an assessment that her agency's officials outlined in a cable to the White House last week.
USAID Administrator Samantha Power, a well-known liberal interventionist and the author of a famous book on American leaders' failure to act in the face of genocide, answered in the affirmative after U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) asked whether "famine is already occurring" in Gaza, which is under a suffocating Israeli siege and relentless bombing campaign.
"Yes," said Power. "In northern Gaza, the rate of malnutrition prior to October 7th was almost zero, and it is now one in three—one in three kids."
During her opening statement at Wednesday's House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, Power said that "nearly the entire population" of Gaza is "living under the threat of famine."
"USAID teams have been working day and night to address the catastrophic humanitarian crisis," said Power, who earlier this year was confronted by current and former USAID officials over the Biden administration's support for Israel's assault on the Palestinian territory, which the United Nations' highest court has deemed a plausible genocide.
The hearing was interrupted by peace activists with CodePink, who pointed to the number of children Israeli forces have killed in Gaza and condemned the USAID chief for "not using her power and influence to end" the assault.
"Will Samantha Power continue to be a bystander and be complicit in genocide? Or will she, in her own words, be an upstander to stop the genocide?" asked Jennifer Koonings, one of the activists who took part in the protest.
Power's remarks to the House panel came after HuffPost's Akbar Shahid Ahmed reported that USAID officials drafted a cable describing the spread of malnutrition in Gaza as "unprecedented in modern history" and warning that deaths from starvation will likely "accelerate in the weeks ahead"—echoing the conclusions of U.N. experts and human rights organizations.
The cable, Ahmed wrote, "shows the Biden administration is aware of the risk that the death toll there will rise dramatically as it continues to support Israel's operation and resist calls for a permanent end to the war."
Last week, hours after Israeli forces killed seven World Central Kitchen aid workers in a series of targeted airstrikes, The New York Timesreported that the Biden administration is pressing Congress to approve a proposed sale of $18 billion worth of F-15 fighter jets to Israel despite U.S. laws barring aid deliveries to nations committing war crimes and obstructing the delivery of American humanitarian assistance.
In late March, the Biden administration quietly approved weapons packages that included more than 1,800 2,000-pound bombs, which the Israeli military has repeatedly dropped on densely populated areas of Gaza.
"The idea that we have supplied and are continuing to supply 2,000-pound bombs which could wipe out an entire block and other military aid is unacceptable," U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) told journalist Christiane Amanpour in an interview that aired earlier this week.
"There is an imminent risk of famine for the majority, if not all, the 2.2 million population of Gaza. This is not a point in debate."
Fears of mass starvation in the Gaza Strip have mounted in recent days as Israel continues to restrict the flow of necessary aid to Gaza, sparking accusations that the Netanyahu government is using hunger as a weapon of war—a grave violation of international law.
"There is an imminent risk of famine for the majority, if not all, the 2.2 million population of Gaza," David Satterfield, the U.S. special envoy for Gaza humanitarian efforts, said Wednesday during a virtual event hosted by the American Jewish Committee.
"This is not a point in debate," he added. "It is an established fact, which the United States, its experts, the international community, its experts assess and believe is real."
A report released earlier this week by the International Crisis Group found that the Israeli government has been directing limited Gaza aid to "big families who agree to embrace its agenda, while targeting those who refuse."
"It has not coordinated military with humanitarian action, endangering aid workers and recipients, and frequently halting convoys," reads the damning report. "It has attacked civilian police, citing links to Hamas, and compelled their retreat, which leaves supplies vulnerable to plunder, whether by profiteers or the desperately hungry. It has tried to work around the international aid system and its protocols for famine prevention and response, doling out assistance on an ad hoc basis in hopes of building a network to administer Gaza on its behalf after the war."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Salvadoran Court Decried for Letting Case Against 'Santa Marta 5' Continue
"It is outrageous that the judge is allowing this trial to go forward despite the lack of any evidence of a crime," said one observer.
Apr 10, 2024
Human rights defenders on Wednesday condemned a Salvadoran court's decision to uphold what critics say are politically motivated murder and illicit association charges against five environmental activists.
Miguel Ángel Gámez, Alejandro Laínez García, Pedro Antonio Rivas Laínez, Teodoro Antonio Pacheco, and Saúl Agustín Rivas Ortega were arrested in January 2023 and accused of murdering María Inés Alvarenga—an alleged collaborator with the U.S.-backed Salvadoran regime that killed approximately 75,000 civilians during a 1979-92 civil war—when the men were Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) rebels.
Defenders of the "Santa Marta Five" have highlighted not only the Salvadoran government's failure to show any proof of the men's guilt, but also the fact that perpetrators of civil war-related crimes are protected under a 1992 amnesty agreement between the government and FMLN.
"It is outrageous that the judge is allowing this trial to go forward despite the lack of any evidence of a crime," said John Cavanagh, a senior adviser at the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Policy Studies.
"The international community stands strong with the five leaders of the successful fight against mining, and we will join Salvadoran water defenders to continue to fight with them for justice in this case," he added.
Advocates for the five defendants have also noted how a "state of exception" imposed as part of right-wing Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele's war on drug gangs has eroded due process and other rights. As Common Dreams has reported, tens of thousands of people have been arbitrarily arrested and imprisoned under the crackdown. More than 130 of them have died in state custody.
Some critics say it's no coincidence that the Santa Marta Five—who played a key role in winning a 2017 ban on metals mining in El Salvador—have been targeted by Bukele's government, which is taking steps to reverse the historic prohibition. Environmental activists have found themselves in the crosshairs.
Vidalina Morales, who heads the environmental and human rights group Association of Economic and Social Development (ADES)—where Santa Marta Five member Pacheco worked— toldAtmos earlier this year that by arresting the Santa Marta Five, Bukele's administration is "sending us a message."
"They want to open the path for these mining projects to come back," she explained. "They want to criminalize the social movements in this country."
"This is the life we're living in El Salvador," Morales added. "We feel so much fear for our lives and the lives of our families."
Viviana Herrera, the Latin America program coordinator at MiningWatch Canada, said Wednesday that "there is a well-documented pattern of criminalization across the Americas, where environmental defenders are slapped with unfounded charges in an effort to silence their opposition to mining and prevent their life-affirming work protecting water for future generations."
"We firmly denounce today's Santa Marta case ruling," she continued. "All five water defenders played pivotal roles securing an historic ban on metal mining in El Salvador, and this ruling is a clear threat to the rights of all Salvadorans who are protecting their water and environment."
"We express our heartfelt sorrow with the five water defenders and their families," Herrera added, "and will continue to call for the charges to be dropped until they are free."
Keep ReadingShow Less
After Missouri Executes Brian Dorsey, Cori Bush Says Abolish Death Penalty
His case, the congresswoman said, "demonstrates the systemic rot of our criminal legal system, which not only fails to prevent violence but actually enables violence itself."
Apr 10, 2024
Democratic U.S. Congresswoman Cori Bush renewed her demand for an end to the death penalty nationwide after her home state of Missouri executed 52-year-old Brian Dorsey on Tuesday evening.
"There is no place in a humane society for state violence. Gov. Mike Parson could have saved Brian Dorsey's life by granting clemency, but he chose to uphold his legacy as the 'Deadly Governor' by denying Mr. Dorsey mercy," Bush said in a statement.
Bush and Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) had written to Parson last week urging the Republican to spare Dorsey's life.
Others who recently tried to prevent Dorsey's execution included family members, five of the jurors who sentenced him to death, over 70 current and former correctional officers, and former Missouri Supreme Court Judge Michael Wolff, who previously upheld his sentence.
\u201cI spent 27 years working in corrections .... I believed that the whole purpose of \u2018corrections\u2019 was to rehabilitate people. I knew Brian Dorsey for many years, and I can say without hesitation that he was completely rehabilitated.... Brian\u2019s execution doesn\u2019t make sense to me.\u201d— (@)
The right-wing U.S. Supreme Court also declined to intervene. Dorsey was injected with a single dose of pentobarbital at the state prison in Bonne Terre and pronounced dead at 6:11 pm local time, according to the Missouri Department of Corrections.
"Dorsey took a few deep breaths as the drug was injected, then several shallow, quick breaths," The Associated Pressreported Tuesday. "At one point he raised his head from the pillow and blinked hard. After several seconds, all movement stopped."
Based on advice from private counsel hired by the Missouri State Public Defender to defend him, Dorsey pleaded guilty to first-degree murder for killing his cousin, Sarah Bonnie, and her husband, Benjamin Bonnie, at their home on December 23, 2006.
"Had counsel investigated and completed an expert evaluation of their client, they would have learned that Mr. Dorsey was not guilty of first-degree murder, as he was neurologically incapable of deliberation," a lawyer for Dorsey wrote in a recent legal filing.
Bush—who is among dozens of congressional Democrats who have advocated against capital punishment—expressed alarm that Dorsey was killed "despite serious concerns about his state of mind when he committed the offense and the legal representation he was provided."
His case, she said, "demonstrates the systemic rot of our criminal legal system, which not only fails to prevent violence but actually enables violence itself."
"We are so much more than our worst mistakes, and not a single one of us deserves to die because of them," the congresswoman added. "We must refuse to allow another life to be taken by our government. We must abolish the death penalty."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular