EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167 |
Activists Found Guilty in Drone Trial
WASHINGTON - December 2 - The New York Times is reporting that President Obama will not apologize for the recent drone strike that killed over 20 Pakistani soldiers earlier this week.
The Syracuse Post-Standard is reporting: “DeWitt Town Justice David Gideon ruled Thursday night that 31 protesters were guilty on two charges of disorderly conduct. But, Gideon said, he spent ‘many a sleepless night’ before making his decision and that he learned a great deal during the five-day nonjury trial, which ended Nov. 5.”
CAROL BAUM, carol at peacecouncil.net
Baum is staff organizer for the Syracuse Peace Council that helped organize the protests. The group released a statement this morning: “On Thursday, December 1, the Hancock 38 drone resisters returned to DeWitt Town Court for the verdict in their case involving a symbolic ‘die-in’ at the main entrance Hancock Air National Guard Base (Mattydale, NY), protesting the piloting and maintenance of the hunter/killer Reaper drones at the Base.
“Early in his decision, Judge David Gideon stated, ‘Many issues were raised that were not heretofore contemplated by this Court on a personal level; for which this Court personally acknowledges a new and different understanding, making the decision now before the Court that much more difficult.’ After much consideration and several sleepless nights, he concluded that the defendants were guilty of both “obstructing vehicular or pedestrian traffic” and “refusing to comply with a lawful order of the police to disperse.”
“In their sentencing statements, the activists contested the Judge’s decision, stating that they were duty bound by the Nuremberg Principles, International Law and the U.S. Constitution to act against drones – the Principles forbid wars of aggression, attacks on civilians and extrajudicial assassinations, all actions associated with drone warfare. Action is urgent since innocents are being murdered every day by drone attacks. The verdict is indeed in – the drones are illegal.
“Most people received a one year conditional discharge, along with a fine of $250 and $150 court costs and community service. Four people were given jail time, ranging from four to fifteen days. The activists are undeterred, vowing to return to the base, inviting the judge, prosecutor, other court employees to join them.
“The action was sponsored by the Upstate NY Coalition to Ground the Drones and End the Wars, consisting of activists from Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Ithaca, Rochester, Syracuse and Utica.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

2 Comments so far
Show AllOnce again, a court and judge ignores the law. Those protestor are lawfully bound to try to stop the crime of the use of the drones to kill innocents at home or abroad. No guts, is the judge's problem. He should be removed from office at the next judicial election. Stopping traffic and ignoring unlawful orders of the police in order to save innocent lives IS NOT A CRIME anywhere in the world except the United States. Shame on the gutless judge! Shame on him and his court.
"Stopping traffic and ignoring unlawful orders of the police in order to save innocent lives IS NOT A CRIME anywhere in the world except the United States. "
This sentence contradicts your first sentence. If these things are a crime in the U.S., then the judge did not ignore the law in convicting them. They should have asked for a jury trial because a jury often ignores the letter of the law. But when a judge imposes his own convictions on a case, he is accused of being an "activist" judge.
That being said, the comments the judge made suggest that he might just slap their wrists when he sentences them.