Get News & Views Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) Alan Barber, (202) 293-5380 x115 |
Who's Above the Social Security Payroll Tax Cap?
WASHINGTON - September 15 - A new paper from the Center for Economic and Policy Research looks at who's above the Social Security payroll tax cap. When most workers look at their pay stubs, they can see that the Social Security payroll tax rate is 12.4 percent – with the employee and employer each paying 6.2 percent. But many workers do not know that any annual wages above $106,800 are not taxed by Social Security. In other words, a worker who makes twice the Social Security wage cap – $213,600 per year – pays Social Security tax on only half of his or her earnings, and one who makes just over a million dollars per year pays the tax on only about a tenth.
Raising the Social Security cap – which would make some or all earnings above $106,800 subject to the Social Security tax – has gotten some attention as a way to help alleviate Social Security’s long-term budget shortfall. U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders plans to introduce legislation to keep the current cap at $106,800, but to also apply the Social Security payroll tax to earnings over $250,000. It is similar to previous bills and echoes a proposal by then-Senator Obama on the campaign trail in 2008. While this would leave those making between the current cap of $106,800 and the proposed cap of $250,000 paying the lowest rates, it would help secure the solvency of the program and avoid an increase in taxes on the middle class.
To help inform this policy debate, this paper examines Census Bureau data from the most recently available American Community Survey to determine how raising the cap would affect workers based on gender, race or ethnicity, age, and state of residence.

Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


1 Comment so far
Show AllLiving and working in The Netherlands, I was amazed when my Dutch social security began at age 65, even though I was still securely employed. When I suggested I didn't need it (yet), the young Mormon clerk told me to give it away to charities I believed in, rather than let the govt spend it on fighter planes and military interventions where we didn't belong. American SS kicked in at 70, though I went on working till 79.
Raising the cap so that everybody pays won't affect the income the wealthy get from investments, so it ought to be a popular move with everybody. And I would suggest not paying to anyone still earning a decent wage, and then increasing the monthly amount paid out by a small percentage for every year the payment is postponed.