EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- The Terror Con
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Center for Media and Democracy Nikolina Lazic at (312)-731-1292 or nikolina@prwatch.org |
Money Still Owed In Federal Bailout: $1.5 Trillion Still Owed to Treasury, Federal Reserve
WASHINGTON - August 3 - A new study released today by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) shows that, despite rosy statements about the bailout's impending successful conclusion from federal government officials, $1.5 trillion of the $4.8 trillion in federal bailout funds are still outstanding.
The analysis, presented in charts and an online table and program profiles, is based entirely on government records. This comprehensive assessment of the bailout goes beyond the relatively small Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) program to look at the rest of the Treasury and Federal Reserve’s multi-trillion dollar response to the financial crisis. It shows that while the TARP bailout of Wall Street (not including the bailout of the auto industry) amounted to $330 billion, the government also quietly spent $4.4 trillion more in efforts to stave off the collapse of the financial and mortgage lending sectors. The majority of these funds ($3.9 trillion) came from the Federal Reserve, which undertook the actions citing an obscure section of its charter. 
“In order to understand the big picture on the bailout, you have to look beyond TARP and examine the trillions the Federal Reserve has disbursed to keep the big banks above water. $4.8 trillion went out the door to aid financial companies and repair the damage they caused to financial markets, and $1.5 trillion of that is still outstanding,” said Mary Bottari, director of CMD’s Real Economy Project.
TOTAL WALL STREET BAILOUT COST TABLE: You can click here to see our a full list of each bailout program, the amount of money disbursed and the amount of money outstanding in each program.
Most of the bailout funds were comprised of aid to banks – the peak outstanding amount was $2.2 trillion in January 2009 – which took place at the height of the financial crisis in the form of loans with below-market interest rates and for questionable collateral to banks directly from the Treasury and Federal Reserve.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchases
CMD’s study also shows how the government is continuing to prop up the same banks that caused the crisis in its attempt to help the housing market. The government’s housing program – which peaked at $1.6 trillion outstanding in July 2010 – is aimed at keeping mortgage lending flowing by subsidizing deals Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac make with the banks. Treasury and the Federal Reserve’s main approach has been to buy more than a trillion dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so that the two government-sponsored enterprises can continue to purchase and bundle mortgages from the banks, which they sell to Fannie and Freddie at a profit. The banks also benefit from the hundreds of billions in direct loans the government has made to Fannie and Freddie, which the GSEs then turn around and make in insurance pay-outs to banks for mortgages that have gone bad.
This massive effort is in stark contrast to the mere $2 billion the Treasury has spent to directly help homeowners stay in their homes via the widely criticized Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) program. With housing prices continuing to falter and the United States approaching 9.2 million foreclosure filings since the beginning of 2008, HAMP can be described as nothing less than an abject failure.
“The Federal Reserve and the Treasury have spent $1.6 trillion in a bank-shot to save the mortgage lending market by using the same financial companies that got us into this mess,” said Conor Kenny, lead author of the study. “That’s more than 800 times what they’ve spent directly to keep homeowners in their houses, and the banks have made money off the whole thing.”
CMD’s analysis also shows how the $4.8 trillion bailout of the financial sector dwarfs the $600 billion that the Federal Reserve spent on the much-hyped “Quantitative Easing 2” of 2010-2011 that was intended to help the broader economy – not just the financial sector – by lowering interest rates across the board and preventing deflation.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



13 Comments so far
Show AllAnd then there are the Credit Default Swaps that the government has guaranteed. the total liablilty of this guarantee is unknown, but has been put as high as $65 Trillion. But that's old (and "forgotten") news.
since many of these CDS were bought to bet that USAns would have their mortgages foreclosed upon, how much of the current budget is going to pay out these CDS?
after all look at the foreclosure rate, lots of CDS should be being claimed.
The US Gov. and Federal reserve are playing a shell game with us.
This implies that the banks will take back their junk collateral, you know, the same kind of collateral banks accept when ordinary people apply for a loan.
Also, please don't forget that the banks extorted the FASB to change the accounting rules eliminating mark to market.
--------This means that trillions of dollars of worthless loans on the bank's balance sheet are being masked.--------
If the banks were forced to correctly value these turds at zero cents on the dollar EVERY MAJOR BANK WOULD BE INSOLVENT.--------
This accounting trick alone is a benefit to the banks worth untold trillions of dollars.--------
And as GottaGetOffTheGrid mentions don't forget about the quadrillion dollars worth of CDS which would be triggered if the biggest wall street casinos were forced into insolvency.--------1.5 trillion dollars is a gross underestimate of the amount owed.
Why does anyone want to steal my lines? Damn. Now how am I going to ask if anyone out there wants to bid on some prime ocean front property in Nebraska?
What's a few trillion amongst friends?
Instead of bemoaning them, you should consider sharing their sacrifice.
Par for the plutocratic course. They make a big noise about the world ending if they don't get 700 billion (Paulson), they get it and while the US Treasury is making lots of hand signals with the TARP funds (you saw how small it looks on the graph and you remember what a "big deal" it was according to the media), the Federal Reserve proceeds to loan at 0% (massively inflating the currency on behalf of the rich and to the detriment through buying power erosion of the poor and middle class)16 trillion according to the audit forced on the Federal Reserve by the Sanders/Paul/Kucinich sponsored Bill and performed by the GAO.
And that is above and beyond the 14 trillion dollar Federal debt.
These crooks never stop their shell games. Everything we were told about US finances and debt for the last 11 years has been one lie after another.
agelbert:
As I recall, most of that $16 TRILLION from the "audit" was simply handed out to foreign banks, corporations, individuals, and governments without any mention of that money being paid back.
Gail,
Exactly. The fed calls them "fully collateralized" loans. They were, as you said, give aways. Anyone that gets a 0% interest loans where the terms are so flexible that 3 years have gone by and they haven't had to pay a nickel is just free loading.
Had all these insolvent banks (and corporations needing cash like Toyota and McDonalds)
not been given these giveaways, the inflation of our currency would not have occurred and those of us on fixed incomes would have actually seen an increase in our buying power.
Why do you think the prices of cars didn't tank? It was grand larceny combined with counterfeiting.
Why in the world aren't the mortgage companies and banks forced to use those gifts from the government to pay off every under-water mortgage and mortgages 3 or more months behind in payments?
That would get all the "bad" loans off their books and prevent more and more citizens from ending up homeless and living on the street. And, if this is correct, the banksters would not be able to continue pretending that they need yet more bailout money.
Government is a dependent institution! Many do agree. The Media, complex as they turn out to be in our times, could do more to help this dependent institution, more-so thinking about the people and less about special interests. We know many of the varieties of capitalist systems around the world. Of-course, each has own crisis experience. Many are disappointed, large though the US is], that cues of the experiences seem to mean nothing there. Frankly therefore what is seen from that part of the Atlantic is becoming more and more frightening. Defenders are using the MEDIA to make people understand less, sadly because they fail to see systems in similar problems that eventually get their forces together to solve them, though one can argue that all is not yet overboard. But it is getting late!
Bailing out banks and corporations in deeply-rooted capitalistic system is no little thing to easily and quickly decipher or apportion blames, except if one ignores or drops history and unfathomable weight of the challenges at the time of change of administration. When one looks at the length of life of the new administration, in fact, one with the right mind sees "ulterior" motives pampered by some Media.
How is a system in crisis that learns from own mistake to truly rework its welfare policies: "make people not live in streets, go unemployed, and starve"? Should all of the rescued banks and corporations have been ignored, it is that same class of "well to dos" that would have bought them "cheap and turned" them into their own "private-wealth-banks", gaining yet more "power" in a system driven by 'lusts' for wealth and "naive": negative rather than positive political power uses.
Where therefore are we, and what are we hiding as the peoples are told 'stories' of problems and failures. Why are people not properly told about the gaps in the country's political morale? Why are the political parties and their roles not really well and critically explained to the people?.. The graphs and statistics do speak but they do not impress or convince many of the people seeing what they keep seeing in that model of capitalism --- working more and more to drain all hopes and trusts and ruin democracy as an abstract function of solidarity: "give", "take" and "live together". Hidden ideological motives behind the paper do much to help flaw its objectivity hence perpetuate the aphorism "no news is good news", for the time being.
Things have gone wrong and everyone is crying in and out of America, in case the world faces a second dip from a "tormenting" economic depression. To try to take time to decorate what has been shortsightedly done remedies nothing, more-so, if people are informed the way they are informed -- pushing blames and not saying who real culprit of the 'blamed' is, at least against ragging talks about party politics and a destructive third party syndrome in an effort to give party politics in the country a "multi-party" look.
NOTE: the text is written in paragraphs, but someone where I can't see decides to lump-up all, that it be tiring to read. It is not the work of this commentator!