Donate Today!


 

EMAIL SIGN UP!

 

Progressive Community

The press releases posted here have been submitted by

America's Progressive Community

For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 20, 2011
5:07 PM

CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA)

Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Public on Budget: Tax the Rich, Cut Military Spending

WASHINGTON - July 20 - TEVEN KULL, skull at pipa.org
Kull is director of the Program for Public Consultation, a joint program of the Center on Policy Attitudes and the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, which released the study “Public Proposes Federal Budget Dramatically Different Than House or White House.” The study found: “When a representative sample of the American public was presented the federal budget, they proposed changes far different from those the Obama administration or the Republican-led House have proposed. The biggest difference in spending is that the public favored deep cuts in defense spending, while the administration and the House propose modest increases. However, the public also favored more spending on job training, education, and pollution control than did either the administration or the House. On average the public made a net reduction of $146 billion — far more than either the administration or the House called for. …

“On average respondents increased revenues by $292 billion. The largest portion was from income taxes: majorities increased taxes on incomes over $100,000 by 5 percent or more and increased them by 10 percent or more for incomes over $500,000. Majorities also increased corporate taxes and other excise taxes.”

DAVID SWANSON, david at davidswanson.org
Swanson is a campaigner with Roots Action, an online activist network, which today posted a series of polls examining public opinion on the budget: http://rootsaction.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=171

Among the polls the group cites:

In order to reduce the national debt, would you support or oppose [ITEM]?:
72% tax the rich (with incomes over $250,000 a year)
42% cut the military
30% cut Medicaid
21% cut Medicare
Washington Post-ABC News Poll, conducted April 14-17, 2011

Expression of first choice policy:
55% cut the military
21% cut Medicare
13% cut Social Security
CBS-New York Times, Conducted January 15-19, 2011

###

A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.



Comments

Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...