February, 08 2011, 10:53am EDT
ACLU Witnesses Brutal Beating Of Los Angeles County Jail Inmate By Sheriff's Deputies
Attack Underscores Need For Systemic Reform And Decrease In Jail’s Population
WASHINGTON
The
American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Southern California
(ACLU/SC) today condemned a recent brutal beating by two Los Angeles
County sheriff's deputies of a detainee at the Twin Towers Correctional
Facility, part of the county jail system.
The violent attack January 24 on James Parker, detained on a
non-violent marijuana charge, was witnessed by ACLU/SC's Esther Lim, who
is assigned to monitor all county jails.
"We believe Mr. Parker's beating is not an isolated incident," said
Hector Villagra, incoming Executive Director of the ACLU/SC. "Rather, it
highlights the rampant violence that continues to plague the county's
jails, and demands court intervention to protect detainees from brutal
attacks and retaliation. That the ACLU/SC monitor witnessed a brutal
attack in plain sight is alarming and can only lead us to conclude
detainees are subject to even greater cruelty when no one is looking."
The beating was made public Monday in a sworn statement submitted in
federal court by Lim, who watched through a glass window as deputies
repeatedly punched, kneed and tasered Parker while he was lying
motionless on the floor.
"Mr. Parker looked like he was a mannequin that was being used as a
punching bag," Lim says in her statement. "I thought he was knocked out,
or perhaps even dead."
Lim hit the glass divider hoping to get the deputies' attention and
stop the attack, but the officers continued to punch and taser Parker.
"Mr. Parker was not fighting with the deputies," Lim says in her
statement, adding he "was not trying to kick, hit or otherwise fight
with the deputies."
Yet deputies continued to order him to "stop resisting" and "stop
fighting," while simultaneously punching and kneeing his limp body
repeatedly and tasering him multiple times.
The deputies then wrote in a jail log that Parker had been fighting and
resisting, in complete contradiction to what the ACLU witnessed.
"This kind of brutal beating is unacceptable," said Peter Eliasberg,
ACLU/SC managing attorney. "We are also very concerned that shortly
after the beating the sheriff's department issued a log report
contradicting what witnesses, including our monitor, saw. The report
claims Parker was resisting and fighting with deputies. That is
blatantly false."
Parker now faces charges for allegedly assaulting the very deputies who beat him.
Lim's statement, along with that of another witness to the beating, was
filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California, to bolster a motion the ACLU filed in November seeking a
federal court order prohibiting jail deputies from retaliating against
prisoners through violence or threats.
The ACLU first sued Los Angeles County and its sheriff on behalf of all
detainees in the county's jail system in 1975, charging the conditions
of their confinement violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against
cruel and unusual punishment. Many remedial orders have been issued
over the years in the case, Rutherford v. Block. But the systemic
problems plaguing the system have recently become so acute the ACLU in
December asked U.S. District Court Judge Dean D. Pregerson to order a
new trial in the case based on "an escalating crisis of deputy violence,
abuse and inmate suicides" at Men's Central Jail, another of the
system's facilities. The ACLU contends the problems plaguing the jail
system can only be fixed by finding alternatives to incarceration like
drug treatment and community-based programs for the low-level,
non-violent offenders and detainees with serious mental illnesses that
comprise the vast majority of the system's population, and seeks to
prove the jail's population can be safely, rapidly and radically reduced
with existing resources and at great savings to county taxpayers.
A report released by the ACLU in September painted a stark picture of
unacceptable levels of violence in the jails, including reports of
deputies beating handcuffed detainees, injuring some so badly that they
ended up in intensive care. The report also showed retaliation against
inmates to be an acute problem. Several prisoners have been severely
punished for meeting with representatives of the ACLU, which is the
court-appointed monitor of conditions inside L.A.'s county jails.
"The reign of terror we're uncovering in the Los Angeles County jails
is unmatched by any of the hyper-violent prisons and jails across the
country we have investigated," said Margaret Winter, Associate Director
of the ACLU National Prison Project. "The brutality there is so blatant
and routine that the deputies carried out a vicious beating in full view
of a court-appointed monitor. The court needs to take immediate action
to ensure the protection of prisoners."
A copy of the ACLU's sworn statement, as well as that of the beating's other witness, is available online at: www.aclu.org/prisoners-rights/declarations-esther-lim-and-christopher-brown-regarding-january-24-2011-beating-twi
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and Brasília's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular