January, 25 2011, 03:00pm EDT
The State of the Union: What to Watch For
President Obama will deliver the State of the Union address to
Congress on Tuesday, January 25. The speech will provide important
indications about the President's priorities for the next year, and
should signal to environmentalists the extent to which he plans to stand
up to corporate polluter lobbyists and support a pro-environment agenda.
Here's Friends of the Earth's view of what the President should say about energy and the environment, and what he shouldn't say.
WASHINGTON
President Obama will deliver the State of the Union address to
Congress on Tuesday, January 25. The speech will provide important
indications about the President's priorities for the next year, and
should signal to environmentalists the extent to which he plans to stand
up to corporate polluter lobbyists and support a pro-environment agenda.
Here's Friends of the Earth's view of what the President should say about energy and the environment, and what he shouldn't say.
What President Obama SHOULD DO in his speech:
1) Commit to protecting the Clean Air Act and vetoing any rollbacks
The Clean Air Act is a landmark law that has cut air pollution, reduced
asthma and lung disease, and saved lives. In 2007, the Supreme Court
confirmed that the Clean Air Act's protections apply to the pollution
that is causing climate change, and as a result the Environmental
Protection Agency has begun implementing the Clean Air Act with modest
measures to reduce climate pollution. Unfortunately, corporate special
interests that would rather be able to pollute freely, with no
constraints, are now backing legislative attempts to roll back the Clean
Air Act's protections. Such rollbacks would be disastrous. President
Obama should make it clear he will use all of the tools at his disposal
to stop them.
2) Rededicate himself to cutting fossil fuel subsidies
Fossil fuels are inherently dirty, but unfortunately, while fossil fuel
industries like Big Oil and King Coal have multibillion dollar profits,
Congress continues to award them massive subsidies. President Obama has
pledged to end fossil fuel subsidies, but so far, Congress has been
unwilling to make necessary cuts. Given that many of the newly elected
members of Congress promised during their campaigns to cut deficit
spending, they should be amenable to eliminating these subsidies, as
doing so would reduce the deficit. Friends of the Earth and allies have
identified $200 billion in environmentally harmful spending that can be
cut from the budget in our Green Scissors report (https://www.greenscissors.com/). President Obama should pledge to spend political capital to eliminate these subsidies.
3) Speak out about the serious threats posed by climate change -- and real solutions
Last year was the hottest year ever recorded, and climate-related
extreme weather events harmed people around the world. Scientists agree
that the impacts of climate change will become much more severe if we do
not rapidly reduce pollution. Unfortunately, right-wing,
polluter-backed misinformation campaigns have confused much of the
public about the state of the science. President Obama should use the
bully pulpit of the presidency to call Americans' attention to this
challenge and the fact that while time is running out, solutions are
still attainable.
4) Explain that government regulation is often a good thing
Effective regulations are essential to the strength of our economy and
the well being of the public. However, corporate special interests
seeking to enrich themselves have tried to make "regulation" a dirty
word. This isn't an abstract debate. We've seen in the past what happens
without sufficient regulation: kids die when they eat contaminated
food, rivers catch on fire, giant oil spills take human life and destroy
ecosystems, corporations discriminate against and mistreat their
employees, and financial institutions engage in behavior so risky that
it crashes the economy. The truth is that in order for markets and
society to function, we need regulations. President Obama should make
this point.
5) Call for a transportation bill that reduces vehicle miles travelled
Americans are boxed in by a built environment that requires cars for
all manner of trips, resulting in worsening health, lost productivity
and leisure time, and unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions. Our
outdated federal transportation policy has resulted in yearly increases
in what the Center for Clean Air Policy has dubbed "empty miles," miles
driven by cars that serve as a drag on household budgets and the wider
American economy. The upcoming debate about the federal surface
transportation bill is the perfect opportunity to reduce miles traveled
by personal vehicles and to reconfigure the built environment by
bringing origins and destinations closer together. President Obama
should urge Congress to promote healthier bodies, healthier pocketbooks,
and a healthier planet by reducing vehicle miles travelled. He should
call for investments in rail, public transit, walkable and bikeable
communities and other smart transportation options.
6) Defend federal agencies from congressional assault
Members of the 112th Congress have threatened to drive
federal agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to a grinding halt with
weekly or even daily hearings questioning their authority to regulate
everything from greenhouse gases to oil spills to genetically engineered
fish. President Obama should strongly defend these agencies, and their
policies and regulations -- both existing and proposed, from any attack
on their authority and ability to protect our environment and public
health from harm.
What President Obama SHOULD AVOID:
1) Calling dirty things clean -- like the so-called 'Clean Electricity Standard'
In last year's State of the Union address, President Obama shocked
environmentalists by calling dirty energy sources such as offshore
drilling, nuclear reactors, biofuels and coal "clean." This year, there
is a danger that he will endorse what is misleadingly called a "Clean
Electricity Standard" -- an energy production mandate that would include
many or all of these dirty energy sources. (See the letter Friends of the Earth and allies sent to Obama urging him to avoid endorsing a dirty Clean Electricity Standard.
[pdf]) A far better approach would be to call for a "Renewable
Electricity Standard" that requires the U.S. to ramp up energy use from
truly clean sources, such as wind, solar and geothermal. We want
President Obama to talk about clean energy, but only if he uses the term
accurately.
2) Pretending half measures are real solutions to climate change
The enormity of the climate crisis requires radical changes to the ways
we produce and consume energy. We can make these changes while making
our society more livable and prosperous, but we can't fool ourselves
into thinking that small changes at the margins will be adequate to
solve the problem. We welcome any steps that President Obama takes to
reduce emissions, but he should frame limited emissions reductions as
first steps in the right direction, rather than actions that will
accomplish all that is needed.
3) Promoting new free trade agreements that will harm workers and the environment
President Obama promised during his campaign to step back from his
predecessors' policy of promoting trade agreements that were great for
wealthy multinational corporations but that harmed workers and the
environment. Unfortunately, the Obama administration recently announced
it supports a NAFTA-style trade agreement with South Korea. President
Obama should adhere to his campaign pledge and stop promoting bad trade
deals. He should not push for the passage of any bad trade agreements in
his speech.
4) Offering to turn the White House over to corporate lobbyists
President Obama won office thanks in large part to his message of
change, particularly his pledge that he would change the way Washington
works and limit the influence of corporate lobbyists. But his recent
selections of William Daley (seen as a close friend of business
interests) as his new chief of staff and GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt as the
head of his council on jobs and economic competitiveness may indicate
that the President is backing away from his commitment to stand up to
corporate special interests. President Obama should make clear in his
speech that he will use the presidency to fight for policies that are in
the public interest -- to stand up for the common good -- and that he
will not give special access to or begin caving more to the demands of
corporate special interests. The government is already far too
subservient to giant corporations; the President must not announce that
he plans to grant them even more influence.
Friends of the Earth fights for a more healthy and just world. Together we speak truth to power and expose those who endanger the health of people and the planet for corporate profit. We organize to build long-term political power and campaign to change the rules of our economic and political systems that create injustice and destroy nature.
(202) 783-7400LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular