January, 19 2011, 01:19pm EDT
Worldwatch Institute Convenes 15th Annual State of the World Symposium in Washington, D.C.
Event highlights innovative next steps to create an environmentally sustainable food system, improve food security, and alleviate hunger and poverty
WASHINGTON
Worldwatch
Institute's 15th Annual State of the World Symposium, convened today,
brought together leading thinkers for a targeted dialogue focused on
agricultural development, hunger, and poverty alleviation. The symposium
occurred in conjunction with the release of Worldwatch's flagship
publication, State of the World 2011: Innovations that Nourish the Planet,which outlines 15 proven, environmentally sustainable prescriptions for alleviating hunger and poverty.
Keynote speakers and panelists included: Kathleen Merrigan, Deputy
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; David Beckmann,
President, Bread for the World; Hans Herren, President, Millennium
Institute; Meera Shekar, Lead Health & Nutrition Specialist with the
Human Development Network at the World Bank; Sara Scherr, President and
CEO, Ecoagriculture Partners; Catherine Alston, Cocoa Livelihoods
Program Coordinator, World Cocoa Foundation; and Stephanie Hanson,
Director of Policy and Outreach, One Acre Fund.
"Farmers-from
sub-Saharan Africa to the U.S.-are the first stewards of the land
because they understand the importance of sustaining the world's natural
resource base," said Merrigan. She addressed an audience that included a
broad variety of international stakeholders, from agricultural
policymakers and nongovernmental representatives to members of the donor
and funding communities. "Our soils and land, our water, our
biodiversity are central to long-term farm productivity. And it is this
understanding that drives farmers to be some of our best innovators. The
ability of small-scale farmers with limited capital to farm in
sustainable ways improves not only their own productivity but also
benefits all of us."
Worldwatch's Nourishing the Planet project (www.nourishingtheplanet.org), which produced this year's State of the World
report, gathered its findings during a 15-month tour of agricultural
innovations, researching projects on the ground in 25 sub-Saharan
African countries. Representatives from two of these projects
participated in the symposium: Edward Mukiibi, co-founder and Project
Coordinator of Developing Innovations in School Cultivation (DISC) in
Uganda, and Sithembile Ndema with the Food and Natural Resources Policy
Analysis Network (FANRPAN) in South Africa.
State of the World 2011 highlights projects
like Uganda's DISC program as a way to give a voice to farmers "from
the field" and to help them share their ideas globally. DISC, for
example, is integrating indigenous vegetable gardens as well as
information about nutrition, food preparation, and culture into school
curricula to teach children how to grow local crop varieties that will
help combat food shortages and revitalize the country's culinary
traditions. An estimated 33 percent of African children currently face
hunger and malnutrition, which could affect some 42 million children by
2025. But many youth are moving away from agriculture and rural regions
in the hope of finding work in urban areas.
"School nutrition programs shouldn't simply feed children," said Mukiibi.
"We must also inspire and teach them to become the farmers of the
future and revitalize the vegetables and traditions of our culture.
Ensuring that the next generation of farmers is well versed in local
biodiversity and sustainable growing practices is a huge step toward improving food security."
South
Africa's FANRPAN is focused on another frequently neglected audience:
women. The organization uses interactive community plays to engage women
farmers, community leaders, and policymakers in an open dialogue about
gender equity, food security, land tenure, and access to resources.
Because women in sub-Saharan Africa make up more than 75 percent of
agricultural workers and provide 60-80 percent of the labor to produce
food for household consumption and sale, it is crucial that they have
opportunities to express their needs in local governance and
decision-making. FANRPAN's entertaining and amicable forum makes it
easier for them to speak openly.
In addition to spotlighting these and other successful agricultural innovations, State of the World 2011: Innovations that Nourish the Planet
draws from the world's leading agricultural experts to outline major
successes in preventing food waste, building resilience to climate
change, and strengthening farming in cities. The report comes at a time
when many global hunger and food
security initiatives-such as the Obama administration's Feed the Future
program, the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), the
United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), and the Comprehensive Africa
Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP)-can benefit from new insight
into projects that are working today to alleviate hunger and poverty in
an environmentally sustainable manner.
"The
international community has been neglecting entire segments of the food
system in its efforts to reduce hunger and poverty," said Danielle
Nierenberg, co-director of the Nourishing the Planet project. "The
solutions won't necessarily come from producing more food, but from
changing what children eat in schools, how foods are processed and
marketed, and what sorts of food businesses we are investing in."
The
report provides a roadmap for increased agricultural investment to more
effectively target projects that are empowering farmers to lift
themselves out of hunger and poverty.
"Bread for the World is calling on Congress to make U.S. foreign
assistance more effective in reducing hunger and poverty around the
world," said Rev. Beckmann. "Reforming foreign aid will
allow developing countries to reduce hunger and help poor people to
build a better future for themselves and their communities."
Serving
locally raised crops to school children, for example, has proven to be
an effective hunger- and poverty-reducing strategy in many African
nations, with strong similarities to successful farm-to-cafeteria
programs in the United States and Europe. Efforts to prevent food waste
are also critical. "Roughly 40 percent of the food produced worldwide is
wasted before it is consumed, creating large opportunities for farmers
and households to save both money and resources by reducing this waste,"
said Brian Halweil, Nourishing the Planet co-director.
The findings of State of the World 2011 will
be shared in over 20 languages with global agricultural stakeholders
that include government ministries, policymakers, farmer and community
networks, and the increasingly influential nongovernmental environmental
and development communities.
Worldwatch
Institute and the Nourishing the Planet project are gratefully
supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as
additional foundations, governments, and institutions including the
Rockefeller and Surdna Foundations, the United Nations Foundation, the
Goldman Environmental Prize, the Shared Earth Foundation, the Wallace
Global Fund, and the Winslow Foundation.
The Worldwatch Institute was a globally focused environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C., founded by Lester R. Brown. Worldwatch was named as one of the top ten sustainable development research organizations by Globescan Survey of Sustainability Experts. Brown left to found the Earth Policy Institute in 2000. The Institute was wound up in 2017, after publication of its last State of the World Report. Worldwatch.org was unreachable from mid-2019.
LATEST NEWS
Privacy Defenders Decry 'Spy Draft' in Section 702 Renewal Advanced by Senate
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," explained one critic.
Apr 18, 2024
Civil liberties defenders on Thursday decried the U.S. Senate's advancement of the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, which critics say lawmakers are trying to ram through without protection against warrantless surveillance and with a provision that would effectively make every American a spy whether they like it or not.
Senators voted 67-32 in favor of a cloture motion to begin voting on RISAA, a bill to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which expires on Friday. FISA—a highly controversial law that has been abused hundreds of thousands of times—allows warrantless surveillance of non-U.S. citizens but also often sweeps up Americans' communication data in the process.
In a 273-147 vote last week, House lawmakers passed RISAA, including an amendment critics say dramatically expands the government's unchecked surveillance authority by compelling a wide range of individuals and organizations—including businesses and the media—to cooperate in government spying operations.
This so-called "Make Everyone a Spy" clause would allow the attorney general or director of national intelligence to force electronic communication service providers to "immediately provide... all information, facilities, or assistance" the government deems necessary.
"This bill would basically allow the government to institute a spy draft," Seth Stern, director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, warned Thursday. "It will lead to significant distrust between journalists and sources, not to mention everyone else."
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," he added. "Regardless of whether the end target of the surveillance is a foreigner, it's indisputable that the people the government can enlist to conduct the surveillance are Americans. And what's more, these civilians ordered to spy would be gagged and sworn to secrecy under the law."
In addition to the "Make Everyone a Spy" provision, civil libertarians have sounded the alarm over the House lawmakers' rejection of an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the legislation.
Critics accuse Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and colleagues including Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.) of trying to rush a vote on RISAA while disingenuously claiming Section 702's powers will expire with the law on Friday. That's a misleading claim, as a national security court earlier this month approved the government's request to continue a disputed surveillance program even if Section 702 lapses.
"There is simply no defense of Majority Leader Schumer and Sen. Warner's duplicity," Sean Vitka, policy director at the progressive advocacy group Demand Progress, said in a statement. "House Intelligence Committee leaders poisoned this bill with one of the most repugnant surveillance expansions in history, and apparently the administration was too busy attacking commonsense privacy protections to notice. They know it, we know it, and now the American people know it."
"There can be no mistake: Sens. Schumer and Warner just helped hand the next president an unspeakably dangerous weapon that will be used against their own constituents," Vitka added. "And there is only one vote left to stop it."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)—who
said earlier this week that the bill would dragoon the American people into becoming "an agent for Big Brother"—on Thursday argued that "this issue demands a debate about meaningful reforms, not a rushed vote to rubber-stamp more warrantless government surveillance powers."
In an attempt to tackle the warrantless surveillance issue, Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) on Thursday proposed a RISAA amendment that would require the government to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court before accessing Americans' private communications.
However, the amendment contains exceptions to the warrant requirement in the event of unspecified emergencies and cyberattacks.
"If the government wants to spy on the private communications of Americans, they should be required to get approval from a judge—just as our Founders intended," Durbin said in a statement. "Congress has a responsibility to the American people to get this right."
The Biden administration and U.S. intelligence agencies vehemently oppose the Durbin-Cramer amendment. The White House called the measure "a reckless policy choice contrary to the key lessons of 9/11 and not grounded in any constitutional requirement or statute."
"The amendment outright bars the government from gaining access to lawfully collected information using terms associated with U.S. persons," the administration added. "Exceptions to that prohibition are narrow and unworkable. They are insufficient to protect our national security."
On Wednesday, the House also passed the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would prohibit the government from buying Americans' information from data brokers if it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain the data, which includes location and internet records. The Senate will now take up FANFSA.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Opposite of Leadership': US Vetoes Palestine's UN Membership
Palestine's permanent observer at the United Nations said the resolution's failure "will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination."
Apr 18, 2024
U.S. President Joe Biden's administration on Thursday used the country's veto power at the United Nations Security Council to block Palestine's bid to become a full member of the U.N.
While 12 nations voted in favor of Palestinian membership and two abstained, the United States is one of five countries—along with China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom—who have veto authority at the Security Council.
Since Israel launched what the International Court of Justice has said is a "plausibly" genocidal assault of the Gaza Strip in response to a Hamas-led October attack, the Biden administration has blocked three cease-fire resolutions at the Security Council. Under mounting global pressure, the U.S. finally abstained last month, allowing a cease-fire measure to pass.
In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, the Biden administration was pressuring other countries to oppose the Palestinian Authority's renewed membership effort so it could possibly avoid a veto, according to leaked cables obtained by The Intercept.
"Take a moment to ponder how isolated Biden has made the U.S.," said Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, after the veto. "Biden lobbied Japan, South Korea, and Ecuador HARD to oppose the Palestine resolution so that the U.S. wouldn't have to veto. They refused. So Biden cast his fourth veto in seven months (!!) This is the opposite of leadership."
In addition to the nations Parsi highlighted, Algeria, China, France, Guyana, Malta, Mozambique, Russia, Sierra Leone, and Slovenia voted for giving Palestine full U.N. membership while Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstained.
After the vote, U.N. Newsreported on remarks from Riyad Mansour, a U.N. permanent observer for the state of Palestine:
"We came to the Security Council today as an important historic moment, regionally and internationally, so that we could salvage what can be saved. We place you before a historic responsibility to establish the foundations of a just and comprehensive peace in our region."
Council members were given the opportunity "to revive the hope that has been lost among our people" and to translate their commitment towards a two-state solution into firm action "that cannot be maneuvered or retracted," and the majority of council members "have risen to the level of this historic moment, and they have stood on the side of justice and freedom and hope, in line with the ethical and humanitarian and legal principles that must govern our world and in line with simple logic."
"The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination," Mansour added. "We will not stop in our effort. The state of Palestine is inevitable. It is real. Perhaps they see it as far away, but we see it as near, and we are the faithful."
Parsi said that "a Western-friendly senior Global South diplomat" told him of Biden's veto: "Whatever agonizing claim the U.S. had to lead a self-appointed free world has died a very loud public death on the Security Council horseshoe tonight. YOU CAN'T LEAD IF YOU CAN'T LISTEN."
Biden, a Democrat seeking reelection in November, has faced fierce criticism in the United States and around the world for U.S. complicity in Israel's war on Gaza—which Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority, has controlled for nearly two decades. In under seven months, Israeli forces have killed 33,970 Palestinians, injured another 76,770, displaced most of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million population, devastated civilian infrastructure, and severely limited the flow of lifesaving humanitarian assistance.
Israel—which already got $3.8 billion in annual U.S. military aid before October 7—continues to receive weapons support from the Biden administration, even as a growing chorus of critics, including some Democrats in Congress, argues that the arms transfers violate U.S. and international law.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shameful': Columbia Greenlights Police Crackdown on Anti-War Encampment
Even after dozens of students were arrested, hundreds "rushed to take the place of their classmates" and continued the protest.
Apr 18, 2024
The arrests of dozens of Columbia University and Barnard College students on Thursday "galvanized" other supporters of Palestinian rights on the campuses, as hundreds of students occupied the school's western lawn after New York City police filled at least two buses with protesters who had been detained for setting up an encampment.
"Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," chanted hundreds of students as they marched around the area where organizers had set up a tent encampment early Wednesday morning.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik informed the campus community on Thursday that she had authorized the police to clear the encampment.
As it has been in the past, the school has become a center of anti-war protests—and crackdowns by school officials and the police—since Israel began its bombardment of Gaza in October.
Pro-Palestinian students and alumni have demanded that Columbia divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid policies in the occupied Palestinian territories and cancel its dual degree program with Tel Aviv University.
In response to pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Columbia in November suspended the campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine—an action that pushed the New York Civil Liberties Union and Palestine Legal to file a lawsuit on behalf of the students last month.
On Thursday, police and Columbia employees took down about 50 tents that had been up for more than a day and disposed of them in trash cans and alleyways—but The New York Times reported later that "demonstrators repitched a couple of tents, and ... recovered the main signage from the encampment as well," while hundreds of students were "still gathered and chanting on the south side of the grass."
The arrests came a day after Shafik testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce about antisemitism on campus.
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose daughter, Isra Hirsi, was among the Barnard students who were suspended on Thursday for participating in the encampment protest, questioned Shafik about whether antisemitic protests have actually taken place at Columbia, prompting the president to say there have not.
"There has been a rise in targeting and harassment against anti-war protesters, because it's been pro-war and anti-war protesters is what it seems, like, correct?" asked Omar.
"Correct," replied Shafik.
On Thursday, Omar posted on social media two images of protesters at Columbia: one from the encampment this week, and one from 1968, when students protested the U.S. war in Vietnam.
New York City Council member Tiffany Cabán was among those who condemned the university's crackdown on the protests on Thursday.
"Suspending and arresting Columbia/Barnard student activists and disbanding student organizations—including Jewish students and organizations—doesn't combat antisemitism or increase safety," said Cabán. "All it does is punish and intimidate those who believe in human rights for Palestinians. Shameful."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular