January, 14 2011, 07:45am EDT
BDS Movement Victory: John Lewis Stops Stocking Ahava Products in Britain
Ahava's goods, processed on stolen Palestinian land, are becoming
too hot to handle. Leading British retail business John Lewis is now
refusing to stock this toxic brand. Canadian retailer The Bay has also
confirmed that it had also discontinued sales of Ahava products.[1]
WASHINGTON
Ahava's goods, processed on stolen Palestinian land, are becoming
too hot to handle. Leading British retail business John Lewis is now
refusing to stock this toxic brand. Canadian retailer The Bay has also
confirmed that it had also discontinued sales of Ahava products.[1]
John Lewis' decision signifies yet another victory for the growing
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Consumers are refusing
to buy goods from companies profiting from Israel's illegal occupation.
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Consumers are refusing
to buy goods from companies profiting from Israel's illegal occupation.
John Lewis' Managing Director, Andy Street, wrote to the Palestine
Solidarity Campaign in a letter dated 7 January: 'As a socially
responsible retailer, John Lewis takes very seriously the treatment of
workers and their working conditions. We expect all our suppliers not
only to obey the law, but also to respect the rights, interests and
well-being of their employees, their communities and the environment.'
He ended by stating: 'In relation to your specific enquiry about Ahava
Dead Sea products, I can confirm that John Lewis has ceased stocking
these particular products'.
Solidarity Campaign in a letter dated 7 January: 'As a socially
responsible retailer, John Lewis takes very seriously the treatment of
workers and their working conditions. We expect all our suppliers not
only to obey the law, but also to respect the rights, interests and
well-being of their employees, their communities and the environment.'
He ended by stating: 'In relation to your specific enquiry about Ahava
Dead Sea products, I can confirm that John Lewis has ceased stocking
these particular products'.
Sarah Colborne, PSC's Director of Campaigns and Operations, said:
'PSC welcomes John Lewis' decision to stop stocking Ahava products.
Israel's continued attacks on the Palestinian population - whether
living under a brutal blockade in Gaza, under illegal occupation in the
West Bank and East Jerusalem, or under constant assault inside Israel,
has led to a seismic shift in public opinion, with the movement for
peace and justice for Palestinians gaining massive support
internationally.
Israel's continued attacks on the Palestinian population - whether
living under a brutal blockade in Gaza, under illegal occupation in the
West Bank and East Jerusalem, or under constant assault inside Israel,
has led to a seismic shift in public opinion, with the movement for
peace and justice for Palestinians gaining massive support
internationally.
'Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories, an Israeli cosmetics company, has its
manufacturing plant and visitors' centre based in the illegal Israeli
settlement of Mitzpe Shalem in the West Bank. The company is 44 per cent
owned by Mitzpe Shalem and another settlement, Kalia, so Ahava's
profits subsidise these illegal colonies.
manufacturing plant and visitors' centre based in the illegal Israeli
settlement of Mitzpe Shalem in the West Bank. The company is 44 per cent
owned by Mitzpe Shalem and another settlement, Kalia, so Ahava's
profits subsidise these illegal colonies.
'Ahava's manufacturing plant is in an illegal Israeli settlement,
on stolen Palestinian land. Its beauty products can't conceal the role
Ahava plays in Israel's dirty occupation. Ahava, and other companies
profiting from Israel's illegal occupation, are being sent a clear
message by consumers who are refusing to buy their products. Although
governments, including our own, are failing to end Israel's violations
of international law and human rights, we can all take action by
refusing to buy Israeli goods and joining the movement for BDS. The PSC
will continue to ensure that companies which profit from Israel's
occupation pay the price for their complicity in Israel's crimes'.
on stolen Palestinian land. Its beauty products can't conceal the role
Ahava plays in Israel's dirty occupation. Ahava, and other companies
profiting from Israel's illegal occupation, are being sent a clear
message by consumers who are refusing to buy their products. Although
governments, including our own, are failing to end Israel's violations
of international law and human rights, we can all take action by
refusing to buy Israeli goods and joining the movement for BDS. The PSC
will continue to ensure that companies which profit from Israel's
occupation pay the price for their complicity in Israel's crimes'.
In 2005, Palestinian civil society issued a call for international
boycott, divestment and sanctions on Israel. PSC launched its national
boycott campaign in 2002, and supports fortnightly protests outside
Ahava's store in Covent Garden, London.
boycott, divestment and sanctions on Israel. PSC launched its national
boycott campaign in 2002, and supports fortnightly protests outside
Ahava's store in Covent Garden, London.
[1] The Bay has confirmed that it had discontinued sales of Ahava
products - with their CEO Bonnie Brooks saying on 13 January 2011: 'the
Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) discontinued sales of AHAVA beauty products,
primarily because of sales results which had been declining for several
years.' It acknowledged that 'Although this decision was made by HBC
solely for commercial reasons, it occurred at the same time as an
aggressive campaign by several groups advocating a boycott of AHAVA
products.'
products - with their CEO Bonnie Brooks saying on 13 January 2011: 'the
Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) discontinued sales of AHAVA beauty products,
primarily because of sales results which had been declining for several
years.' It acknowledged that 'Although this decision was made by HBC
solely for commercial reasons, it occurred at the same time as an
aggressive campaign by several groups advocating a boycott of AHAVA
products.'
LATEST NEWS
GOP Affirms 2025 Tax Plan If Trump Wins: More Giveaways to the Rich
"There are 20 years of data showing trickle-down economics doesn't work, yet today will still be a whole lot of revisionist history and wishful thinking on the singular largest failure of fiscal policy in recent memory," said Rep. Richard Neal.
Apr 12, 2024
As House Republicans prepare for Donald Trump's possible White House return by plotting to expand the billionaire and corporate tax cuts that were the cornerstone of the former president's first administration, congressional Democrats and advocates for working Americans warned Thursday that a second Trump term would bring more of the same inequality-exacerbating policies.
The GOP-controlled House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing Thursday on "expanding the success" of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)—widely derided by opponents as the "GOP Tax Scam." Republican committee members couched a policy that the Center for Popular Democracy said "delivered big benefits to the rich and corporations but nearly none for working families" as "relief to help hardworking American families."
Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), the committee's ranking member, pushed back during Thursday's hearing, noting that "in the last three decades, Republicans have skyrocketed the deficit with trillions in tax cuts for billionaires and big corporations, always with the same result: the top 1% benefits while nothing trickles down for workers."
Neal continued:
In 2017, Ways and Means Democrats saw the GOP corporate tax giveaway for what it was: a scam. We knew that their Tax Scam would disproportionately benefit the wealthy and well-connected. We knew that it wouldn't pay for itself. We knew that big corporations, not their workers, would feel the most benefit. Six years since the GOP Tax Scam was signed into law, we've been proven right on every count. It didn't pay for itself, it didn't increase revenue, and it didn't increase wages.
A recent study whose authors included [Joint Committee on Taxation] economists—let that sink in—found that ALL of the corporate gains from TCJA went to shareholders and high-paid executives, with absolutely nothing flowing to workers. Fifty-six percent of the tax cuts enriched shareholders, and the remaining 44% lined the pockets of execs. Zero percent went to workers. ZERO!
"There are 20 years of data showing trickle-down economics doesn't work, yet today will still be a whole lot of revisionist history and wishful thinking on the singular largest failure of fiscal policy in recent memory," Neal added. "If workers and the middle class are actually your priorities, putting them ahead of big corporations and billionaires is the only way."
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.)—who also sits on the committee—agreed, asserting on social media that "the Trump tax cuts were a huge 'success' if you were a billionaire or an executive at a large corporation. They made out like bandits, with a huge amount of the benefits from the GOP tax law going to the wealthiest. Now Republicans want to give the superrich even more tax cuts."
Trump is open about this. At an exclusive fundraiser at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida last week, he shouted out his "rich as hell" supporters, telling them, "We're gonna give you tax cuts, we're gonna pay off our debt."
That's the same debt that soared by around $8 trillion during Trump's term—largely as a result of his tax cuts. Meanwhile, U.S. billionaires have collectively gotten $2.2 trillion richer since the GOP tax cuts took effect.
With many provisions of the TCJA set to expire at the end of 2025, progressives are underscoring what's at stake in this November's elections.
"Today the American people got a preview of what's in store for them next year if the Trump Tax Scam expires under conservative leadership," Groundwork Collaborative executive director Lindsay Owens said following the House hearing. "The conservative playbook for the 2025 tax fight is coming into focus, and we can be sure it includes more giveaways for the wealthy and corporations."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Lawless Con Man' Leonard Leo Defies Senate Subpoena Over Supreme Court Gifts
"This subpoena is a direct result of Mr. Leo's own actions and choices," said Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin.
Apr 12, 2024
"Incredible," said one journalist on Friday of right-wing legal activist Leonard Leo's reasons for refusing to comply with a subpoena from the Senate Judiciary Committee as the panel investigates conservative Supreme Court justices' relationships with Leo and other Republican operatives and donors.
The Federalist Society co-chairman told The Washington Post that the subpoena was "politically motivated."
"I am not capitulating to [committee Chair Dick Durbin's (D-Ill.)] lawless support of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and the left's dark money effort to silence and cancel political opposition," said Leo, who has lobbied for the appointments of far-right judges to federal benches, in a statement.
The subpoena came over four months after the committee voted along party lines to subpoena Leo and billionaire GOP donor Harlan Crow following numerous reports about luxury travel and gifts they and others bestowed on Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
ProPublica revealed last June that Leo organized a luxury fishing trip to Alaska for Alito, with lodging and private jet travel paid for, in 2008. The trip was not included on Alito's federally required financial disclosure forms, continuing a pattern that ProPublica first reported on last April with several luxury vacations, real estate transactions, and other financial gifts to Thomas that were paid for by Crow.
Durbin said Thursday that the subpoena was issued because of the "blanket refusal to cooperate" with the investigation that Leo has displayed since last July.
"His outright defiance left the committee with no other choice but to move forward with compulsory process. For that reason, I have issued a subpoena to Mr. Leo," said Durbin. "Mr. Leo has played a central role in the ethics crisis plaguing the Supreme Court and, unlike the other recipients of information requests in this matter, he has done nothing but stonewall the committee. This subpoena is a direct result of Mr. Leo's own actions and choices."
The ethics violations revealed by ProPublica's reporting forced the Supreme Court last fall to adopt a code of conduct for the first time, modeled on the rules followed by judges on lower federal courts.
But ethics watchdogs labeled the code a "toothless PR stunt" and a "cover-up for Clarence Thomas," as it did not include an enforcement mechanism and provided the justices with discretion over recusal decisions.
Debt relief advocates called on Alito to recuse himself last year from two cases pertaining to Biden's student debt cancellation program, citing the reporting on Leo's gifts to the justice. The plane Alito took to Alaska was owned by billionaire investor Paul Singer, who has financially backed groups that lobbied the court to overturn Biden's plan.
The court struck down the debt relief program last June.
Like former President Donald Trump, said Alex Aronson, former chief counsel for Judiciary Committee senior member Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), "the other man most responsible for shaping our Supreme Court's runaway majority is a lawless con man and crook."
Caroline Ciccone, president of government watchdog Accountable.US, said Friday that "Supreme Court billionaire matchmaker Leonard Leo" is the force behind "a full-blown corruption crisis has plagued the high court for over a year, undermining its credibility and plummeting public trust in the court to record lows."
"Today's subpoena is a critical step toward accountability, and toward ensuring that our high court adheres to the highest possible ethics standards," said Ciccone. "As a result of the strong leadership of Chairman Durbin and the Judiciary Committee, we can now begin to get to the bottom of the corruption crisis pervading the Supreme Court."
With Leo refusing to comply with the subpoena, Democrats would need to hold a vote in the closely divided Senate to seek enforcement.
Former Trump aide Peter Navarro was found guilty of contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the committee that investigated the January 6, 2021 insurrection, and reported to a federal prison last month to serve his four-month sentence.
"Leonard Leo thinks he's above the law just like Navarro did," said one attorney. "We'll see if he's right."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fears of 'Disastrous' War Grow as Iran Weighs Retaliation for Israel Consulate Attack
"The U.S. ought to be distancing itself from Israel's illegal attack, but instead the Biden administration is moving to shield Israel from the consequences of its own actions."
Apr 12, 2024
A reportedly imminent Iranian response to Israel's deadly bombing of Tehran's consulate in the Syrian capital earlier this month is heightening fears of a devastating regional conflict in which the United States—Israel's top ally and arms supplier—could become directly involved.
The U.S. embassy in Jerusalem issued a security warning on Thursday and restricted its employees' travel ahead of a possible Iranian response as soon as Friday. U.S. officials, according toPolitico, have assessed that "Iran is calibrating its plans for a major retaliatory strike against Israel to send a message—but not spark a regional war that compels Washington to respond."
U.S. President Joe Biden and top administration officials have in recent days stressed their "ironclad" commitment to defending Israel in the case of an Iranian reprisal, despite widespread condemnation of Israel's consulate attack as a significant escalation and flagrant violation of international law.
The attack killed more than a dozen people, including diplomats and a senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander.
"When the Israeli regime completely violates the immunity of individuals and diplomatic places in violation of international law and the Vienna Conventions, legitimate defense is a necessity," Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said in a statement Thursday.
Two unnamed U.S. officials toldCBS News that Iran's response could "include more than 100 drones and dozens of missiles aimed at military targets inside the country." Biden administration officials have asked China and other nations to urge Iran not to respond to the consulate attack.
The Israeli government, which is currently waging a catastrophic war on the Gaza Strip, signaled it would respond forcefully to any Iranian retaliation, raising the possibility of direct U.S. involvement. Axiosreported that the senior U.S. military commander in charge of the Middle East visited Israel Thursday to "coordinate around a possible attack on Israel by Iran and its proxies."
"Whoever harms us, we will harm them," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a speech Thursday against a backdrop of U.S.-made F-15 fighter jets.
"The Israeli government appears to want to goad Iran into a military response to divert attention from the slaughter and famine in Gaza and to trap the U.S. into joining the fight."
While war hawks in the U.S. have used the surge in tensions to agitate for a direct American-Israeli attack on Iran, advocacy groups and anti-war commentators have warned against any additional escalation, fearing the eruption of all-out military conflict in the Middle East.
"A regional war involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran would be disastrous for U.S. interests, the people of Iran, and the security of the region as a whole," the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) said earlier this week. "President Biden must do far more to avert this crisis before off-ramps close."
Responsible Statecraft columnist Daniel Larison wrote Friday that with its unwavering support for the Netanyahu government, the Biden administration is "moving in the wrong direction."
"The U.S. ought to be distancing itself from Israel's illegal attack, but instead the Biden administration is moving to shield Israel from the consequences of its own actions," Larison wrote. "Israeli forces have routinely struck Iranian and other targets in Syria for more than a decade, but the attack on the consulate in Damascus was a major escalation both in terms of the location and the rank of the Iranian officers that were killed."
"The Israeli government appears to want to goad Iran into a military response to divert attention from the slaughter and famine in Gaza and to trap the U.S. into joining the fight," Larison added. "The president has made it that much easier for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by volunteering to walk into the trap."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular