December, 21 2010, 07:15am EDT
Honduras: Prosecute Post-Coup Abuses
Attacks and Threats Remain a Very Serious Concern
NEW YORK
Honduran authorities should take concrete
steps to end impunity for abuses committed after the country's 2009
coup, and to curb ongoing attacks against journalists, human rights
defenders, and political activists, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.
The 65-page report, "After the Coup: Ongoing Violence, Intimidation, and Impunity in Honduras,"
documents the state's failure to ensure accountability for abuses
committed under the country's de facto government in 2009. The report
also documents 47 cases of threats or attacks - including 18 killings -
against journalists, human rights defenders, and political activists
since the inauguration of President Porfirio Lobo in January 2010.
"We undertook this independent assessment because a year and a half
after the coup in Honduras, the consequences for human rights are still
being felt," said Jose Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights
Watch. "It is clear from our findings that until Honduran authorities
take concrete steps to reduce impunity and stop the attacks, it will be
very difficult to restore trust in the country's democratic system."
The lack of accountability - and ongoing violence and threats - have
had a chilling effect on free speech and political participation in
Honduras, particularly among those who opposed the 2009 coup, Human
Rights Watch said.
The 2009 coup was condemned by the international community. The OAS
suspended Honduras's membership, and many Latin American governments
withdrew their ambassadors from the country. The United States also
objected to the coup; though, unfortunately, it waited more than two
months before imposing effective sanctions on the de facto government.
Post-Coup Abuses
After the coup, security forces committed serious human rights
violations - including excessive force against demonstrators and
arbitrary detentions - as well as illegitimate restrictions on freedom
of expression and assembly.
No one has been held criminally responsible for any of these
violations. The Human Rights Unit of the Attorney General's Office has
filed charges in 20 cases of alleged violations committed under the de
facto government. Judges acquitted the defendants in eight cases and the
rest remain pending before the courts, including some cases that are
stalled because the accused remain at large.
This lack of progress is primarily the result of the lack of
cooperation with, and support for, the Human Rights Unit on the part of
other state institutions, particularly during the early stage of the
investigations in 2009, Human Rights Watch said.
Security forces obstructed investigations of abuses committed after
the coup, Human Rights Watch found. They failed to turn over firearms
for ballistics tests, to respond to information requests to identify
officers accused of committing abuses, and to grant access to military
installations. While security forces have been somewhat more cooperative
since President Lobo took office, the earlier lack of cooperation has
had a lasting impact on the investigations.
Other obstacles include the Human Rights Unit's limited resources and
its reliance on investigative police who lack the independence
necessary to conduct impartial investigations into violations by
security forces. Progress on these cases has been hindered by the
government's failure to allocate funds to the Witness Protection
Program.
In addition, the Supreme Court created a climate in which lower-court
judges were discouraged from ruling against de facto authorities, Human
Rights Watch said. The court endorsed the military's actions on the day
of the coup, and subsequently disregarded constitutional appeals
challenging policies of the de facto government. It also exercised its
disciplinary powers in an arbitrary and seemingly political fashion in
May, when it fired four judges who had publicly questioned the coup's
legality.
Attacks on Journalists, Human Rights Defenders, Political Activists
Since President Lobo's inauguration, at least 18 journalists, human
rights defenders, and political activists have been killed, several in
circumstances that suggest the crimes may have been politically
motivated. For example, on February 15, gunmen shot and killed Julio
Benitez, an opponent of the coup who had received numerous threatening
phone calls warning him to abandon his participation in opposition
groups.
Human Rights Watch has also received credible reports of 29 other
cases involving threats or attacks against journalists, human rights
defenders, and political activists. For example:
- On April 8, Father Ismael Moreno, a Jesuit priest and human rights
advocate, received a text message threatening to kill the family of a
female coup opponent who had been raped by police officers. Father
Moreno had been helping the woman and her family to leave Honduras. - In early June, Eliodoro Caceres Benitez, a political activist,
received three telephone death threats stating that members of organized
crime would kill him and his family. His son has been missing since
June 13. - On September 15, police and military members attacked the offices of
Radio Uno, a station that has been critical of the coup. They threw
tear gas into the radio station's offices, broke windows in the
building, damaged equipment, and seriously injured one person.
Available information indicates that Honduran authorities have made
very little, if any, progress in investigating these cases. In the
absence of thorough investigations it is difficult to determine how many
of the attacks were politically motivated or whether there was official
involvement in any of them.
Yet the ongoing political polarization in Honduras and circumstantial
evidence in the majority of the 2010 cases in this report - including
explicit statements by perpetrators in some instances -suggest that many
victims may have been targeted because of their political views,
fueling a climate of fear that has undermined basic freedoms in
Honduras.
One political activist, for example, told Human Rights Watch that she
had felt compelled to abandon her political activities after armed men
accosted her and her daughters. Another, who was shot in the leg during
an assassination attempt, said he had stopped participating in political
activities as a result of the attack. A radio journalist held that a
colleague left his job at the station where they worked after receiving
repeated death threats for his political views.
Recommendations
The report recommends that Honduran authorities:
Support the Human Rights Unit by:
- providing additional funds to extend the one-year budget increase approved by Congress for the unit for 2011;
- guaranteeing the full collaboration of military and police personnel with ongoing investigations; and
- allocating funds to the Witness Protection Program, which has not received specific funding since it was created.
Strengthen judicial independence by:
- creating an independent body to take over many of the Supreme Court's disciplinary functions; and
- establishing procedures for appointing, sanctioning, and removing
judges and judicial employees that are transparent and protect against
political interference in judicial processes.
Establish an International Commission of Inquiry to:
- carry out thorough investigations into abuses committed after the
coup and into ongoing attacks and threats against journalists, human
rights defenders, and political activists; and - support the efforts of the Human Rights Unit to prosecute these cases.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Weak Biden Endangered Species Rules a 'Massive Missed Opportunity'
"Imperiled plants and animals do not have the time for half-measures, since extinction is forever," one expert warned.
Mar 28, 2024
While welcoming efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to undo Trump-era damage to endangered species protections, conservationists warned Thursday that three new federal rules are inadequate, given the world's worsening biodiversity crisis.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries, which proposed the rules last June, said that they will "restore important protections for species and their habitats; strengthen the processes for listing species, designating of critical habitat, and consultation with other federal agencies; and ensure a science-based approach that will improve both agencies' ability to fulfill their responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)."
The Center for Biological Diversity—which had blasted the Trump administration for taking a "wrecking ball" to the decades-old law—praised the agencies for removing barriers to designating unoccupied areas as critical habitat as well as for restoring the "blanket rule" for threatened species and the ban on considering economic impacts of listing decisions.
However, the center also pointed out that "of the 31 harmful changes made in 2019 to the act's regulations, only seven are fully addressed and corrected in today's final rules," despite years of work on the new rules and nearly half a million public comments.
"We're mostly still stuck with the disastrous anti-wildlife changes made by the previous administration."
"This was a massive missed opportunity to address the worsening extinction crisis," said Stephanie Kurose, a senior policy specialist at the center. "We needed bold solutions to guide conservation as the climate crisis drives more and more animals and plants to extinction. Instead we're mostly still stuck with the disastrous anti-wildlife changes made by the previous administration."
Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, similarly said that "while the regulations restore some essential wildlife protections, we were hopeful for far more than the marginal win the Biden administration delivered today."
"Our nation's threatened and endangered species are under constant attack and the Endangered Species Act is the only thing standing between them and extinction," she stressed. "We appreciate the administration's work on this matter, but at the end of the day much work remains to be done to ensure the Endangered Species Act can fulfill its critical lifesaving mission."
Experts at the environmental law organization Earthjustice also expressed disappointment that—as Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans put it—the Biden administration didn't fully seize "the opportunity to fully reverse the damage inflicted upon the Endangered Species Act and the imperiled species it protects."
Writing about former Republican President Donald Trump's gutting of the ESA—which Biden helped pass shortly after joining the U.S. Senate in 1973—Earthjustice president Abigail Dillen explained at The Progressive on Wednesday:
The dismantling of the ESA could not have come at a worse time. Scientists around the world are telling us that we are on track to lose a million or more species in this century. We have already witnessed a staggering drop of more than two-thirds of all plant and animal life on Earth since 1970. In the United States, nearly half of our ecosystems are now at risk of collapse. It is a staggering pace of loss that climate change is only accelerating.
It would have been far worse without the ESA. The law has saved 99% of listed species from extinction, including the bald eagle, Florida manatee, and the gray wolf, one of my first "clients" when I began my career as an environmental lawyer more than two decades ago.
Earthjustice attorney Kristen Boyles declared Thursday that "we are in the midst of an extinction crisis; it is time for bold action."
"Imperiled plants and animals do not have the time for half-measures," she noted, "since extinction is forever."
The new rules—expected to provoke lawsuits from farmers, ranchers, and right-wing groups—come as Biden and Trump prepare for a rematch in November.
"One of the lingering legacies of Donald Trump is his attempt to undermine the Endangered Species Act, one of the most successful and popular conservation laws in the history of the United States," Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous said Thursday. "At this moment, we should be listening to scientists and acting urgently to save biodiversity, not letting Donald Trump's gutting of environmental safeguards and sellouts to Big Business stand."
"President Biden has made generational investments in climate action with the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, but we need him to do more to protect imperiled wildlife," he added. "The Biden administration needs to protect more habitat, not less. We need the administration to increase protections for biodiversity, not abandon them. The president has the power, and we need him to use it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
ICJ Issues New Order in Genocide Case as Another Gaza Child Starves to Death
The World Court cited "exceptionally grave" developments, especially the "spread of famine and starvation," in once again ordering Israel to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza.
Mar 28, 2024
Citing "the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular the spread of famine and starvation," the International Court of Justice on Thursday ordered Israel to allow desperately needed humanitarian aid into the embattled enclave and reiterated an earlier directive to prevent genocidal acts.
The ICJ's new provisional order—which passed by a vote of 15-1, with Israeli Ad-Hoc Judge Aharon Barak dissenting—states that Israel must take "all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza."
This includes "food, water, electricity, fuel, shelter, clothing, hygiene, and sanitation requirements, as well as medical supplies and medical care."
The Hague-based court also ordered Israel to ensure "with immediate effect that its military does not commit acts which constitute a violation of any of the rights of the Palestinians in Gaza as a protected group" under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The court's directive is a response to a March 6 request by South Africa, which filed the genocide case against Israel last December. On January 26, the tribunal issued a provisional ruling that found Israel was plausibly committing genocide in Gaza and ordering the country to prevent genocidal acts.
A final ruling in the case could take years. ICJ rules permit the court to "revoke or modify any decision concerning provisional measures if, in its opinion, some change in the situation justifies such revocation or modification."
Critics accuse Israel of ignoring the January 26 order. South Africa said its March 6 request for modification was prompted by "horrific deaths from starvation of Palestinian children, including babies, brought about by Israel's deliberate acts and omissions" including "concerted attempts" since January 26 to ensure the defunding of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) "and Israel's attacks on starving Palestinians seeking to access what extremely limited humanitarian assistance Israel permits into Northern Gaza."
The new ICJ order notes that "Israel rejects 'in the strongest terms' South Africa's claims that incidents of starvation in Gaza are a direct result of its deliberate acts and omissions."
However, the court found that "exceptionally grave" recent developments, including "at least 31 people, including 27 children, having already died of malnutrition and dehydration... constitute a change in the situation."
Underscoring the severity of the crisis, a 5-year-old boy,
identified by Al Jazeera as Mohammed Naeem al-Najar, died of malnutrition Thursday at Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza.
This, as Israel is blocking UNRWA aid convoys from entering the northern part of the besieged strip.
The U.N. Human Rights Council on Monday published a draft report that found "reasonable grounds to believe" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a move that came on the same day as the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire in the ongoing war, a move enabled by a U.S. abstention.
More than 30 nations, as well as the the Arab League, African Union, and other international organizations, have joined South Africa's ICJ suit. On Wednesday, Ireland said it would intervene in the case after observing "blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale" by Israeli forces in Gaza.
Palestinian and international officials say that since the Hamas-led October 7 attacks on Israel, Israeli bombs and bullets have killed at least 32,552 Palestinians—most of them women and children—while wounding nearly 75,000 others. At least 7,000 more Palestinians are missing and feared dead and buried beneath the rubble of hundreds of thousands of bombed-out buildings. Approximately 90% of Gaza's 2.3 million people have been forcibly displaced.
Keep ReadingShow Less
House Dems Tell Biden to 'Enforce US Law' as Israel Obstructs Gaza Aid
"Israel’s restriction of this aid and Prime Minister Netanyahu's refusal to address U.S. concerns on this issue is absolutely unacceptable," wrote six House Democrats.
Mar 28, 2024
While United Nations experts and human rights groups around the world continue to call on U.S. President Biden to end his support for Israel as it bombards Gaza and blocks aid, six House Democrats told the president that his policy in the region is a straightforward violation of U.S. law, and must change immediately.
Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) led lawmakers including Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), and Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) in calling on Biden to "enforce U.S. law" with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu government.
With Israel continuing to block aid to Gaza—even as the International Food Security Phase Classification initiative (IPC) warns that parts of northern Gaza are already facing famine—the lawmakers said Netanyahu is "repeatedly interfering in U.S. humanitarian operations in direct violation of the Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act—Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961."
The Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act states that the U.S. cannot provide military aid to any country that is prohibiting or restricting the delivery of U.S. assistance into an area.
Despite State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller's claim this week that Israel is complying with international humanitarian law "when it comes to the conduct of the war or the provision of humanitarian assistance," the International Court of Justice on Thursday ordered Israel to ensure the delivery of urgently needed aid and warned that "famine is setting in" due to Israel's actions.
"The need to deliver humanitarian aid by any means possible has never been more pressing," wrote the lawmakers on Thursday. "This fact was emphasized by your administration's decision to begin airdropping supplies into Gaza in recent weeks, and your announcement of U.S. participation in constructing a temporary port in Gaza to expand the flow of aid."
"Israel's restriction of this aid and Prime Minister Netanyahu's refusal to address U.S. concerns on this issue is absolutely unacceptable," they said.
The letter follows similar calls from U.S. senators and more than two dozen human rights groups who earlier pointed out that Biden need look no further than the Foreign Assistance Act to know that the U.S. can no longer provide Israel with military support.
"This law is very straightforward," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told NPR earlier this month. "It's clearly triggered by the facts on the ground in Gaza, where we now have kids who have literally died of starvation, and hundreds of thousands of people on the verge of starvation, with 4 out of the 5 hungriest people in the world today in Gaza."
McCollum and her colleagues wrote that Biden must also "reassess how our assistance is provided to Israel" if it moves forward with plans to launch a ground offensive in Rafah, "a move that would put the 1.5 million Palestinians displaced from other parts of Gaza in imminent danger and exacerbate the rate of disease, starvation, and death in the conflict."
"We echo our colleagues in the U.S. Senate in imploring you to enforce U.S. law with the Netanyahu government," wrote McCollum and her colleagues. "Mr. President, the situation in Gaza is dire. Immediate action from the United States is necessary to stop further loss of civilian life, and we urge you to use every tool at your disposal to end the suffering in this crisis and to keep this conflict from expanding."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular