December, 01 2010, 10:58am EDT
Kenya: Support Disclosure of HIV Status to Children
Ignorance Threatens HIV Prevention and Treatment
NEW YORK
Children have the right to age-appropriate information about their
HIV status and should not be the last to find out that they are
HIV-positive, Human Rights Watch said on World AIDS Day, December 1,
2010. Human Rights Watch described its research in Kenya about the
subject and called on the Kenyan government to provide guidance to
health workers and parents on disclosure, which could start from the age
of 6, taking into account the child's maturity and the specific
clinical and social context.
Governments around the world need to create sound policies on supportive ways to disclose HIV status to children and adolescents as more children worldwide are tested for HIV and have access to anti-retroviral treatment (ART), Human Rights Watch said.
"Parents, caregivers, and health workers who avoid telling children
about their HIV status can do a lot of harm, unwittingly," said Juliane
Kippenberg, senior children's rights researcher at Human Rights Watch.
"They can shatter a child's emotional and physical health and carry
stigma about HIV to the next generation."
Human Rights Watch research in Kenya shows the disastrous effects of
poor disclosure policies. Children who do not know they are HIV-positive
may be less likely to take their medication regularly, which can lead
to drug resistance and death. Children who belatedly find out that they
are HIV-infected may be more likely to internalize stigma and feel
betrayed by those who hide their status. If adults withhold such
important information for years, children may sense a problem and live
in great anxiety. Some children are confronted with the news of their
illness through public comments from others, and experience trauma and
depression.
Approximately 180,000 children in Kenya are living with HIV, and
slightly more than 40,000 children are on ART. Most of these children
have been infected all of their lives through mother-to-child
transmission, yet parents and caregivers in Kenya often do not tell
their children that they are HIV-positive until they reach adolescence.
Human Rights Watch interviewed children between ages 8 and 14 who had
not been told of their HIV status, as well as parents and other
caregivers, health workers and counselors.
Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, children under age
18 have a right to information about their own health. But Kenya's
National Guidelines for HIV Testing and Counseling leave the
responsibility for disclosure with the caregiver and do not allow health
workers to disclose HIV-status to a child unless a parent or guardian
has given permission. The guidelines permit health workers to inform
children who are pregnant, married, or sexually active. In practice,
though, sexually active children do not always disclose this information
to health workers, and hence are not told if they are HIV-positive.
Denying older children information about their HIV status violates
the child's right to information and privacy, and the child's right to
voluntary, confidential HIV counseling and testing, Human Rights Watch
said. It also compromises the child's ability to participate in his or
her own medical care, an important part of the right to health.
"Many parents are reluctant to tell their children that they are
infected with HIV," Kippenberg said. "They want to protect the child
from the stigma they experience themselves, and mothers in particular
may feel guilty for having infected their children or worry that their
own status may become known."
Kenya should provide more support and information for parents about
how to tell their children they are HIV-positive, Human Rights Watch
said.
Kenya's guidelines only cautiously encourage health providers to
"attempt to introduce age-appropriate information about HIV as early as
possible" and to "offer to assist with disclosure in case difficult
questions arise." Kenya's National AIDS/STD Control Programme (NASCOP)
has developed good training material on child disclosure, but few health
workers have been trained. NASCOP is setting up a committee to deal
with the issues of child testing, counseling, and disclosure, a positive
move, Human Rights Watch said.
"Accepting HIV is more painful when children find out late,
particularly during adolescence," Kippenberg said." Children should be
told about their HIV-positive status in a supportive manner from an
early age, and counseled about prevention when they grow older."
Early disclosure is also necessary for prevention, Human Rights Watch
said. Many adolescents start having sex before learning about their
status, and they risk spreading the virus to others.
The World Health Organization has stated that "informing older
children of their diagnosis of HIV improves adherence," to taking
anti-retroviral medication and has recommended that children above age
10 should be involved in discussing HIV testing. It has also urged
governments to provide guidance to healthcare workers about the process
of informing a child of their HIV status, because "informing children
and disclosing their HIV status to them is a process best performed with
support from skilled health professionals." The American Academy of
Pediatrics encourages disclosure of HIV status to school-age children.
Human Rights Watch called upon the government of Kenya to:
- Provide clear, accessible guidelines for disclosure of HIV status
that recommend consideration of disclosure to children starting from age
6, taking into account each child's cognitive and emotional maturity,
family dynamics, and the clinical context;
- Allow health workers to disclose HIV status to a child within these
new guidelines if they judge the child to be ready, and if the child
wants to know his or her status and has been appropriately counseled;
- Provide counseling for parents and caregivers at HIV testing and
counseling centers to overcome their concerns regarding disclosure and
guide the disclosure process;
- With the support of donors, train health workers at HIV testing and counseling centers on disclosure to children; and
- Ensure that HIV/AIDS and life skills education programs take into
account the situation of children living with HIV in addition to
prevention methods, and that the programs are carried out in a sensitive
manner.
Nearly 90 percent of HIV-positive children worldwide live in
sub-Saharan Africa. The barriers the Kenyan government faces in
addressing the needs of children living with HIV and AIDS are similar to
those other Eastern and Southern African countries confront. In recent
years, important progress has been made in providing children with ART
in Africa, with nearly 300,000 children now receiving the drugs there.
However, close to one million children on the continent still do not get
the life-saving drugs because they have not been tested for HIV, lack
transportation or adequate food, or have poor family support.
Personal Accounts From Kenya:
(Names of children, caregivers, and counselors are pseudonyms)
"We had a 13-year-old boy whose father was alive and HIV-positive,
but his mother died of HIV. The father stigmatized HIV. The boy was
positive but did not know, and the father did not want to disclose. The
boy came to us with a TB cyst and rashes.... ARVs [anti-retrovirals]
eventually became available, but the boy never found out [his status],
because his father and aunt never told him. The boy refused to take his
medications. He died in 2009."
- Community counselor, Kayole, Nairobi, November 5, 2010
"My 5-year-old, Martha, is positive. She takes ARVs, but I tell
Martha that she needs to take the drugs for a chest infection and also
show her that I take the same drugs. Sometimes she doesn't want to take
them and says that she's healed, or says, "Drugs, drugs, drugs," or "Why
me only and not the others?" I have not received any training on
disclosure and I do not know of any place to get this training.
Community health workers have told me that I need to tell the child that
she is positive but they have not given me a way to do so."
- Mother of Martha A., Kayole, Nairobi, November 5, 2010
"My son is 10 and was told by his teachers at school that HIV
happened to people who had 'bad manners'... He is HIV positive and I
have been trying to slowly disclose, but it is difficult because of the
wrong information he has gotten from the school. He was watching TV and
saw someone drinking alcohol and said, 'That man has bad manners, he
will get HIV.' Then I asked him if he thought he could ever get HIV, and he said, 'No Mom, I am a good boy I do not have bad manners.'"
- Hannah K., community health worker and parent, Nairobi, November 3, 2010
"My son David is 12, he doesn't know that he is [HIV] positive. He
takes ART... He [thinks] that it [is] because he had chest problems.
Sometimes he throws his drugs away. He is tired of taking drugs.... I
have thought of telling him that he's positive, but I am afraid that he
will hang himself or kill himself... David thinks that only adults have
HIV and kids are not supposed to [have it].... I asked him what he would
do if he was HIV positive and he said, 'I will kill myself, I will take
poison.' If you can come up with a program to educate kids on HIV, it
will be better for me."
- Mother of David B., Kayole, Nairobi, November 5, 2010
"Two or three days ago Elaine found out that she was positive. She
overheard some people here... talking about it... She heard that the
medicines that she is taking are for people with HIV/AIDS.... For the
first two days [after this] she refused to take them [the drugs]."
- Mother of Elaine, age 12, Eldoret, August 19, 2008
"I was surprised [about my HIV-positive status] but not upset, I take
my medicines and I am healthy. It is better to know your status so you
can avoid getting sicker and dying."
- James W., age 12, who was told about his disease by his mother, Kayole, Nairobi, November 5, 2010
"I felt very bad. I had no idea I had HIV. I didn't understand at
first. I wanted to know that I will not die, that I can have a family
and be loved. I have not told anyone at school, not even teachers. But
it is better that I know, because I might be dead or very sick. I now
have [HIV] positive friends, and I can talk and sit with other children
at school because I feel better. Before, I was suffering alone, I was
ashamed of my illness and I ate alone at school [due to fingernails
breaking off, and other opportunistic infections]."
- Rose W., age 11, who was told about her status at age 9, and
recently joined a child support group, Kayole, Nairobi, November 5, 2010
"I would say any time the child starts asking questions about why I
am here, why am I taking these medications, is the right time to tell
the child. [Disclosure] can be a gradual process.... I would say this
can be from age 7 to 10. At the very least, a child above 10 should know
their status. There is a gap in training in the country on how to do
disclosure to children."
- Kenyan pediatrician, Eldoret, August 19, 2008
"There is a conflict of interest between the parents' needs and the
child's needs, but we need to disclose before the child reaches
adolescence because they run into very serious problems with adherence
[to ART]... The problem once you get to into adolescence, they feel
cheated if they are not disclosed. There is a loss of trust for adults
in their lives, they are not sure what they can believe."
- Professor Ruth Nduati, associate professor of pediatrics at the
School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi,
November 12, 2010
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Dodges Growing Calls for Probe of Mass Graves at Gaza Hospitals
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," said one legal expert.
Apr 24, 2024
While continuing to give Israel billions of dollars in support to wage war on the Gaza Strip, the Biden administration this week has declined to join the growing global demands for an international probe into mass graves discovered at hospitals in the besieged Palestinian enclave.
Two journalists on Tuesday questioned Vedant Patel, a spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, about the administration's response to the hundreds of bodies found at Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital and Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis as well as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk's call for an independent investigation.
"Would you support such an independent investigation?" Said Arikat asked during a press briefing. Patel responded, "Right now, Said, we are asking for more information... That is squarely where we are leaving the conversation."
Patel added that "I don't have any details to match, confirm, or offer as it relates to that. We're aware of those reports, and we have asked the government of Israel for additional clarity and information. And that's where I'm at."
When Said asked a follow-up about potential U.S. support for a probe, Patel reiterated that the administration is awaiting information from the Israeli government.
Later, Niall Stanage asked Patel to explain U.S. "resistance" to supporting a probe, the spokesperson insisted that "it's not about resistance to this particular situation, it is me not wanting to speak in detail about something which Said posed as a hypothetical question when, from the United States' perspective, I don't have any additional information on this aside from the public reporting."
After Patel again stressed that the administration has asked Israel for more information, Stanage inquired, "And do you believe the government of Israel is a credible source in enlightening you?"
The spokesperson interrupted Stanage to say, "We do."
While supporting the six-month Israeli assault on Gaza that the International Court of Justice has found to be plausibly genocidal, the Biden administration is also arming Ukrainians' resistance to a Russian invasion. Brian Finucane, a senior adviser for the Crisis Group's U.S. program and a former legal adviser at the State Department, pointed to the latter.
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," Finucane said on social media in response to Stanage's questioning.
Meanwhile, European Union spokesperson Peter Stano made clear Tuesday that the E.U. supports an independent probe.
"This is something that forces us to call for an independent investigation of all the suspicions and all the circumstances, because indeed it creates the impression that there might have been violations of international human rights committed," Stano said. "That's why it's important to have independent investigation and to ensure accountability."
Human rights groups around the world joined the call for an independent investigation on Wednesday, as the official death toll in Gaza hit 34,262 with 77,229 people injured and thousands more missing and presumed dead beneath the rubble.
In an Arabic statement translated by Al Jazeera, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said that the number of bodies found in the mass graves is "alarming, and requires urgent international action, including the formation of an independent international investigation committee."
The group added that some of those killed were subjected to "premeditated murder as well as arbitrary and extrajudicial executions while they were detained and handcuffed."
Amnesty International senior director of research, advocacy, policy, and campaigns Erika Guevara Rosas said in a statement that "the harrowing discovery of these mass graves underscores the urgency of ensuring immediate access for human rights investigators, including forensic experts, to the occupied Gaza Strip to ensure that evidence is preserved and to carry out independent and transparent investigations with the aim of guaranteeing accountability for any violations of international law."
"Lack of access for human rights investigators to Gaza has hampered effective investigations into the full scale of the human rights violations and crimes under international law committed over the past six months, allowing for the documentation of just a tiny fraction of these abuses," she noted. "Without proper investigations to determine how these deaths took place or what violations may have been committed, we may never find out the truth of the horrors behind these mass graves."
Guevara Rosas continued:
Mass grave sites are potential crime scenes offering vital and time-sensitive forensic evidence; they must be protected until professional forensic experts with the necessary skills and resources can safely carry out adequate exhumations and accurate identification of remains.
The absence of forensic experts and the decimation of Gaza's medical sector as a result of the war and Israel's cruel blockade, along with the lack of availability of the necessary resources for the identification of bodies such as DNA testing, are huge obstacles to the identifications of remains. This denies those killed the opportunity to have a dignified burial and deprives families with relatives missing or forcibly disappeared the right to know and to justice—leaving them in a limbo of uncertainty and anguish.
Noting that the International Court of Justice directed Israel to preserve evidence in its initial genocide case order, Guevara Rosas said that "amid a total vacuum of accountability and mounting evidence of war crimes in Gaza, Israeli authorities must ensure they comply with the ICJ ruling by granting immediate access to independent human rights investigators and ensuring that all evidence of violations is preserved."
"Third states must pressure Israel to comply with the ICJ orders by allowing the immediate entry into the Gaza Strip of independent human rights investigators and forensic experts, including the U.N.-appointed Commission of Inquiry and investigators of the International Criminal Court," she added. "There can be no truth and justice without proper, transparent independent investigations into these deaths."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular