October, 26 2010, 09:08am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Report says US Government Dumps e-Waste, Poisons Prisoners
Following
the release of a investigation by the Department of Justice's Inspector
General revealing that federal prisons (operating under the trade name
UNICOR) routinely exposed inmates to toxic heavy metals and exported
hazardous wastes to developing countries, the Basel Action Network (BAN)
calls for consumers large and small to only use e-Stewards(r)
qualified recyclers that will not export hazardous wastes to developing
countries and will not utilize prisoner labor for managing it.
WASHINGTON
Following
the release of a investigation by the Department of Justice's Inspector
General revealing that federal prisons (operating under the trade name
UNICOR) routinely exposed inmates to toxic heavy metals and exported
hazardous wastes to developing countries, the Basel Action Network (BAN)
calls for consumers large and small to only use e-Stewards(r)
qualified recyclers that will not export hazardous wastes to developing
countries and will not utilize prisoner labor for managing it.
The
e-Stewards Standard was created by the environmental community after a
government led effort to create a standard for responsible recycling
failed to ban the export of hazardous waste or the use of prison labor
to manage sensitive electronic waste as well as exports to developing
countries.
e-Stewards Standard was created by the environmental community after a
government led effort to create a standard for responsible recycling
failed to ban the export of hazardous waste or the use of prison labor
to manage sensitive electronic waste as well as exports to developing
countries.
The
report, entitled "Review of Federal Prison Industries' Electronic-Waste
Recycling Program," not only admits e-wastes are exported to developing
countries, but it also reports that the UNICOR staff were involved in
cover-ups, money laundering, theft, fraud and other charges.
report, entitled "Review of Federal Prison Industries' Electronic-Waste
Recycling Program," not only admits e-wastes are exported to developing
countries, but it also reports that the UNICOR staff were involved in
cover-ups, money laundering, theft, fraud and other charges.
BAN,
together with the Electronic TakeBack Coalition of which it is a part,
has long opposed the use of prison labor because it subjects vulnerable
prison populations to hazardous substances, provides for an unfair
taxpayer funded subsidy which hurts the private sector development of
recycling infrastructure, and allows criminals to inappropriate access
to sensitive private data found on hard drives and other data media.
together with the Electronic TakeBack Coalition of which it is a part,
has long opposed the use of prison labor because it subjects vulnerable
prison populations to hazardous substances, provides for an unfair
taxpayer funded subsidy which hurts the private sector development of
recycling infrastructure, and allows criminals to inappropriate access
to sensitive private data found on hard drives and other data media.
"We
have said all along, that prisoners should not be managing toxic waste
and the federal government should never allow the export of such wastes
to developing countries," said Jim Puckett, Executive Director of the BAN. "Now
we are finding out that not only did the federal government continue to
allow it, they were doing it themselves and may still be doing it to
this day."
have said all along, that prisoners should not be managing toxic waste
and the federal government should never allow the export of such wastes
to developing countries," said Jim Puckett, Executive Director of the BAN. "Now
we are finding out that not only did the federal government continue to
allow it, they were doing it themselves and may still be doing it to
this day."
The
export of hazardous electronic waste to developing countries is
contrary to decisions taken by the international community at the Basel
Convention, an international treaty under the auspices of the United
Nations Environment Program for which BAN serves as a watchdog
organization. To date, though, the US government has not ratified the
Basel Convention and has failed to support the global decision to amend
the Convention to forbid all exports of hazardous wastes to developing
countries. EPA's former Electronic Waste Senior Scientist, Mr. Bob
Tonetti, who in the past was a strong supporter of continued US
government exports of hazardous wastes and who was quoted as saying that
export was part of the US e-Waste strategy, is now chief of UNICOR
operations. He is quoted in the recent report stating that he continues
to send e-waste to other companies which in turn export of e-waste,
including hazardous cathode ray tube glass, to countries like India and
Malaysia. Such exports are likely to be in violation of Basel
Convention trade rules.
export of hazardous electronic waste to developing countries is
contrary to decisions taken by the international community at the Basel
Convention, an international treaty under the auspices of the United
Nations Environment Program for which BAN serves as a watchdog
organization. To date, though, the US government has not ratified the
Basel Convention and has failed to support the global decision to amend
the Convention to forbid all exports of hazardous wastes to developing
countries. EPA's former Electronic Waste Senior Scientist, Mr. Bob
Tonetti, who in the past was a strong supporter of continued US
government exports of hazardous wastes and who was quoted as saying that
export was part of the US e-Waste strategy, is now chief of UNICOR
operations. He is quoted in the recent report stating that he continues
to send e-waste to other companies which in turn export of e-waste,
including hazardous cathode ray tube glass, to countries like India and
Malaysia. Such exports are likely to be in violation of Basel
Convention trade rules.
"It
is outrageous that in this report the federal government admits to the
Department of Justice that it continues to violate international law
with impunity," said Puckett. "This gross violation of human rights, sustainable development and international law must cease at once."
is outrageous that in this report the federal government admits to the
Department of Justice that it continues to violate international law
with impunity," said Puckett. "This gross violation of human rights, sustainable development and international law must cease at once."
BAN
urges passage of new House Bill 6252, introduced by Representatives
Raymond Green and John Carter of Texas and Mike Thompson of California,
which will ban the export of US hazardous wastes to developing
countries. And BAN urges all consumers of electronics, large and small,
to be sure to only take their e-Wastes to e-Stewards recyclers who do
not export the equipment to developing countries. You can find an
e-Stewards recycler at:
www.e-Stewards.org
urges passage of new House Bill 6252, introduced by Representatives
Raymond Green and John Carter of Texas and Mike Thompson of California,
which will ban the export of US hazardous wastes to developing
countries. And BAN urges all consumers of electronics, large and small,
to be sure to only take their e-Wastes to e-Stewards recyclers who do
not export the equipment to developing countries. You can find an
e-Stewards recycler at:
www.e-Stewards.org
Basel Action Network's mission is to champion global environmental health and justice by ending toxic trade, catalyzing a toxics-free future, and campaigning for everyone's right to a clean environment.
LATEST NEWS
'Collapse of Political Ambition': EU Shelves Nature Restoration Law
"To let this go now means we go into European elections saying the European system is not working, we do not protect nature, we do not take climate seriously," said Ireland's environmental minister. "That would be an absolute shame."
Mar 26, 2024
Environmental ministers in the European Union on Monday warned that the bloc's credibility on heading off the global biodiversity and climate emergencies is in peril following the European Council's decision to remove the historic Nature Restoration Law from its agenda after the proposal lost key support.
"We inspired others, yet now we risk arriving empty handed at COP16 [the 2024 UN Biodiversity Conference]," Virginijus Sinkevičius, E.U. commissioner for environment, oceans, and fisheries, said in a statement. "Backtracking now is... very difficult for me to accept."
The law, first introduced in 2022 and approved by European Parliament last month, faced one final hurdle to passage with the planned Council vote, but recent protests by farmers over the new nature restoration requirements helped push some previous supporters to reverse their positions on Monday.
The Nature Restoration Law, which supporters said they still intend to try to pass before E.U. elections in June, would require member states to adopt measures to restore at least 30% of habitats by 2030, working up to 90% by 2050. Member states would be required to take action to reverse pollinator populations, restore organic soils in agricultural use, increase development of urban green areas, and take other steps to protect biodiversity.
Since the farmer protests began in France and started spreading to other countries including Spain, Belgium, and Italy, policymakers have offered concessions including delayed implementation of another set of biodiversity rules calling for the agriculture industry to keep 4% of farming land free of crop production to regenerate healthy soil. The European Commission also shelved an anti-pesticide law in February in response to the protests.
As countries announced their new opposition to the Nature Restoration Law in recent days, some ministers suggested the demonstrations contributed to their decision.
Anikó Raisz, Hungary's minister of state for environmental affairs, said the law would "overburden the economy" and cited concerns about the "sensitive situation" in the agriculture sector. Italy also said it was concerned about the biodiversity rules' impact on farmers.
The World Wide Fund For Nature (WWF) accused far-right Hungarian President Viktor Orbán, who has dismissed European climate policies, of being behind the "unexpected and clearly politically motivated change in Hungary's position."
Hungary's opposition "was left unchallenged by Sweden, Poland, Finland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, and Italy—who continue to either abstain or oppose," and "has now put the [Nature Restoration Law] in jeopardy again, giving Hungary's President Viktor Orbán the green light to further his own agenda and hold E.U. decision-making hostage," said WWF.
Eamon Ryan, Irish minister for the environment, accused other policymakers in the bloc of "buckling" before the farmer protests, which continued Tuesday, ahead of June elections.
"The biggest risk is the collapse of political ambition and will," Ryan said. "To let this go now means we go into European elections saying the European system is not working, we do not protect nature, we do not take climate seriously. That would be an absolute shame."
BirdLife Europe called on the E.U. the continue its efforts to pass the Nature Restoration Law before the session ends this summer.
"The E.U.'s reputation hangs in the balance in this critical year of E.U. elections," said the group. "Failure to make the law a reality also undermines the E.U.'s credibility and leadership on its international commitments to tackle the biodiversity and climate crises."
"This is definitely not the end of the story," Alain Maron, Belgium's minister for climate change, environment, energy, and participative democracy, told reporters at a press conference Monday. He added that the Belgian presidency of the European Council "will work hard in the next few weeks to find possible ways out of this deadlock, and get the file back on the agenda for adoption in another council."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Under Fire for Downplaying Security Council Resolution as 'Nonbinding'
One expert accused the U.S. of working to "undermine and sabotage the U.N. Security Council, the 'rules-based order,' and international law."
Mar 26, 2024
Biden administration officials attempted Monday to downplay the significance of a newly passed United Nations Security Council resolution, drawing ire from human rights advocates who said the U.S. is undercutting international law and stonewalling attempts to bring Israel's devastating military assault on Gaza to an end.
The resolution "demands an immediate cease-fire for the month of Ramadan respected by all parties, leading to a lasting sustainable cease-fire." The U.S., which previously vetoed several cease-fire resolutions, opted to abstain on Monday, allowing the measure to pass.
Shortly after the resolution's approval, several administration officials—including State Department spokesman Matthew Miller, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield—falsely characterized the measure as "nonbinding."
"It's a nonbinding resolution," Kirby told reporters. "So, there's no impact at all on Israel and Israel's ability to continue to go after Hamas."
Watch Matt Lee ask StateSpox about the passing of the UN ceasefire resolution. Basically the US position is it makes no difference and Miller calls 🇷🇺/🇨🇳 veto cynical.
Lee: Do you expect Israel is going to announce a ceasefire?
Miller: I do not
Lee: What’s the point of the UN? pic.twitter.com/FibaSKWjuh
— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) March 25, 2024
Josh Ruebner, an adjunct lecturer at Georgetown University and former policy director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, wrote in response that "there is no such thing as a 'nonbinding' Security Council resolution."
"Israel's failure to abide by this resolution must open the door to the immediate imposition of Chapter VII sanctions," Ruebner wrote.
Beatrice Fihn, the director of Lex International and former executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, condemned what she called the Biden administration's "appalling behavior" in the wake of the resolution's passage. Fihn said the administration's downplaying of the resolution shows how the U.S. works to "openly undermine and sabotage the U.N. Security Council, the 'rules-based order,' and international law."
In a Monday op-ed for Common Dreams, Phyllis Bennis, a senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, warned that administration officials' claim that the resolution was "nonbinding" should be seen as "setting the stage for the U.S. government to violate the U.N. Charter by refusing to be bound by the resolution's terms."
While all U.N. Security Council resolutions are legally binding, they're difficult to enforce and regularly ignored by the Israeli government, which responded with outrage to the latest resolution and canceled an Israeli delegation's planned visit to the U.S.
Israel Katz, Israel's foreign minister,
wrote on social media Monday that "Israel will not cease fire."
The resolution passed amid growing global alarm over the humanitarian crisis that Israel has inflicted on the Gaza Strip, where most of the population of around 2.2 million is displaced and at increasingly dire risk of starvation.
Amnesty International secretary-general Agnes Callamard said Monday that it was "just plain irresponsible" of U.S. officials to "suggest that a resolution meant to save lives and address massive devastation and suffering can be disregarded."
In addition to demanding an immediate cease-fire, the Security Council resolution calls for the unconditional release of all remaining hostages and "emphasizes the urgent need to expand the flow of humanitarian assistance."
Israel has systematically obstructed aid deliveries to Gaza, including
U.S.-funded flour shipments.
Farhan Haq, deputy spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, stressed during a briefing Monday that "all the resolutions of the Security Council are international law."
"They are as binding as international laws," Haq said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
State of Emergency Declared After Cargo Ship Destroys Baltimore Bridge
Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin said he was "deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore."
Mar 26, 2024
A state of emergency was declared in Maryland early Tuesday morning after a large cargo ship slammed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, leading to its total collapse and sending a number of vehicles and people into the Patapsco River.
As the Baltimore Sunreports:
In a Tuesday morning news conference, just a few hours after the incident, Baltimore Fire Department Chief James Wallace said authorities are "still very much in an active search and rescue posture" noting they are searching for "upwards of seven individuals" and that sonar has detected the presence of vehicles in the water. There is no indication that the event was intentional, Wallace said.
"This is a tragedy that you could never imagine … It looked like something out of an action movie," Mayor Brandon Scott said.
In a later press conference, officials said that two members of a construction crew that was on the bridge at the time of the collision had been rescued while six others remained unaccounted for.
The terrifying footage of the bridge's collapse—which CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez commented was "almost unbelievable" to watch—is circulating widely on news channels and social media:
This video is almost unbelievable. The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore literally collapsed this morning after it was struck by this large ship. pic.twitter.com/rYuy4U2r7H
— Omar Jimenez (@OmarJimenez) March 26, 2024
U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Tuesday that he had spoken with Mayor Scott and well as Maryland Governor Wes Moore and was helping to coordinate federal assistance.
"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," said Buttigieg.
Moore said in a statement he had declared a state of emergency and that work was underway to "quickly deploy federal resources" to the area.
"We are thankful for the brave men and women who are carrying out efforts to rescue those involved and pray for everyone's safety," said Moore. "We will remain in close contact with federal, state, and local entities that are carrying out rescue efforts as we continue to assess and respond to this tragedy."
Early reporting indicated that no crew members aboard the container ship, which sails under a Singapore flag, were injured or missing. A local harbor pilot was also said to be on board at the time of the crash.
"Deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) following the accident. "I'm profoundly thankful to first responders on the scene and will track rescue efforts by local, state, and federal authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular