August, 24 2010, 12:50pm EDT
Amnesty International Report Cites Unlawful Killings and Torture Linked to Yemen's Counter-Terrorism Campaign
Yemen Abandons Respect for Human Rights in Response to U.S. Pressure to Counter Terrorism, Report Says
LONDON
Under pressure from the United
States and others to confront threats from al-Qaeda, along with Zaidi Shi'a
rebels in the north and growing demands for secession in the South, the
Yemini government is using national security as a pretext to stifle criticism
and reject human rights in a campaign of unlawful killings, torture, arbitrary
arrests and unfair trials, Amnesty International charged in a new report
today.
The human rights organization said the downward
spiral in respect for human rights documented in the report, Yemen:
Cracking Down Under Pressure, includes unlawful killings of those accused
of links to al-Qaeda and Southern Movement activists, enforced disappearances,
arbitrary arrests, torture and unfair trials.
Aliya Ibrahim al-Wazirdescribed how
she and six other women relatives of detainees organized a sit-down protest
near al-Salih Mosque in Sana'a in September 2009. "I was beaten by
the police women. I held a photo of my husband and they tried to take the
photo from me. When I refused they hit me in the face and on my mouth,
blood came out of my mouth."
Yemenis accused of supporting the Huthis who
are armed Zaidi Shi'a rebels in the northern Sa'dah region, or the Southern
Movement, have also been targeted for arbitrary detention, unfair trials
in specialized courts and beatings. Journalists, dissenters, human rights
defenders, and critics of the government are subject to the same abuses.
Some have been subjected to enforced disappearance
for weeks or months by largely unaccountable security agencies that report
directly to Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh.
"An extremely worrying trend has developed
where the Yemeni authorities, under pressure from the United States and
others to fight al-Qa'ida, and Saudi Arabia to deal with the Huthis, have
been citing national security as a pretext to deal with opposition and
stifle all criticism," said Malcolm Smart, Amnesty International's director
for the Middle East and North Africa Program."All
measures taken in the name of countering terrorism or other security challenges
in Yemen must have at its heart the protection of human rights."
The number of death sentences passed in trials
of people accused of having links to al-Qaeda, or to the Huthi armed group
has noticeably increased. In 2009, at least 34 people accused of links
to Huthi armed groups were sentenced to death.
The security forces have killed at least
113 people since 2009 in operations the government says target "terrorists."
Attacks have become more frequent since December 2009 with security forces
in some cases making no attempt to detain suspects before killing them.
At least 41 people were killed, 21 of them
children and 14 of them women, on December, 17, 2009 when their settlement
in al-Ma'jalah area in the southern district of Abyan was hit by missiles.
"The Yemeni authorities have a duty to ensure
public safety and to bring to justice those engaged in attacks that deliberately
target members of the public, but when doing so, they must abide by international
law," said Smart. "Enforced disappearances, torture and other ill-treatment,
and extrajudicial executions are never permissible, and the Yemeni authorities
must immediately cease these violations."
"It is particularly worrying that states
such as Saudi Arabia and the U.S.A. are directly or indirectly aiding the
Yemeni government in a downward spiral away from previously improving human
rights record."
The Southern Movement is a loose coalition
of individuals, political groups and other organizations advocating for
greater rights for people in the south, with origins tracing back to the
1994 civil war between northern and southern Yemen. Many factions of the
Movement now call for the south to secede from the rest of Yemen.
Huthis, followers of Hussain Badr al-Din
al-Huthi in the region of Sa'dah, have been fighting the government since
2004. Beginning as a protest over the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, it developed
into armed conflict particularly after the killing of their leader by the
government.
The Specialized Criminal Court (SCC) was
created in the name of 'countering terrorism' in 1999 and expanded in
2004; three additional SCCs were then established in 2009. The SCC has
been used to convict people such as journalists covering the conflict in
Sa'dah, or grievances expressed by the Southern Movement. Hundreds
have been tried by the SCC since its establishment.
This court is now being used by the Yemeni
authorities against a wide range of people whose activities or disclosures
are considered hostile or harmful to the government.
Qassem Askar Jubran, former diplomat, and
Fadi Ba'oom, political activist, were arrested in April 2009, charged
with "harming the independence of the Republic" and "the unity of Yemen"
and for organizing protests in aid of the Southern Movement. Both were
sentenced to five years' imprisonment in March 2010, and have since been
released.
"All they have against him is involvement
in the Southern Movement, writing in al-Ayyam newspaper, attending
gatherings," Salah Askar Jubran, Qassem's brother told Amnesty International
in March.
The creation of the Specialized Press and
Publications Court (SPPC) in May 2009 was widely seen as a government attempt
to suppress non-violent opposition and the expression of critical views
in the media.
Anissa Uthman, a journalist working for al-Wassat
newspaper, is among several journalists and editors tried by the SPPC.
In her absence she was sentenced to three months' imprisonment in January
2010 on charges of defaming President Saleh. According to reports, she
was prosecuted because of articles she wrote criticizing the arrest and
imprisonment of human rights activists.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.8 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
World Bank, IMF Must Prioritize Wealth Tax and Canceling Debt to Tackle Global Inequality
While global institutions claim to want to tackle inequality, said one campaigner, "ordinary people struggle more and more every day to make up for cuts to the public funding of healthcare, education, and transportation."
Apr 15, 2024
With world leaders convening in Washington, D.C. this week for the annual Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, global anti-poverty campaigners said Monday that delegates from the world's largest economies must prioritize taxing the superrich and taking other steps to alleviate rampant inequality in the Global South.
Oxfam International revealed that based on the World Bank's analysis of worldwide inequality and poverty, 64 out of 106 low- and middle-income countries that receive grants and loans from the bank and the IMF have high or increasing rates of income inequality.
Sixty percent of countries that are eligible for grants or low-interest loans from the International Development Association (IDA) have ratings above 0.4 on the Gini coefficient scale—a warning level developed by the United Nations. The scale rates more equal countries closer to 0 and countries with high income and wealth disparities closer to 1, with rating above 0.4 signifying high levels of income inequality.
Kate Donald, head of Oxfam International's Washington, D.C. office, noted that the news comes less than a year after more than 200 worldwide economists successfully pressured the World Bank to set a new goal of reducing the number of countries with high inequality rates.
The agreement was "a landmark move," said Donald. "But if the bank is serious about tackling inequality, the first test will be making it a headline priority for its lending to the world's poorest countries, being discussed now at the Spring Meetings."
According to Oxfam's analysis, half of IDA-eligible countries are overindebted and need roughly 45% of their debt to the banks canceled in order to address surging inequality in their own communities.
The global financial institutions must prove at the Spring Meetings that "tackling inequality is a priority," said Donald.
"Ordinary people struggle more and more every day to make up for cuts to the public funding of healthcare, education, and transportation," she said. "This high stakes hypocrisy has to end."
At Inter Press Service, Jaime Atienza, equitable financing director at the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS, pointed to the example of Zambia, one of 37 countries identified by Oxfam as facing rising levels of inequality.
While still struggling, Atienza wrote, through the G20 Common Framework on Debt, Zambia "secured serious debt relief and restructuring with both government and private creditors, which will help enable vital and urgent investments in health, education, and social protection."
"For too long, Zambia's plans for ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030, and for realizing crucial development needs, have been held back by constraints in investment caused by the debt crisis," wrote Atienza. "The debt relief and restructuring that has been agreed at last gives the country a fighting chance. All those who have facilitated this agreement have saved and transformed lives."
In dozens of countries in the Global South, said Oxfam, "ballooning debt and interest repayments are diverting scarce resources from crucial areas like public education and healthcare and social safety nets."
Both Atienza and Oxfam said delegates from G20 countries, the world's largest economies, must center at the Spring Meetings Brazil's call for a global plan to require wealthy people to pay their fair share in taxes.
"Higher taxes on the income and wealth of richest could raise trillions of dollars to plug IDA funding shortfalls and to fill the huge development and climate funding gaps in low- and middle-income countries," said Oxfam, which noted that the net wealth of billionaires must by taxed more than 8% annually to help reduce inequality in the worst-affected countries.
Wealthy governments must also increase their donations to the IDA, said Donald, which have flatlined in recent years despite growing needs in African countries and throughout the Global South.
"We don't buy the excuse that 'we can't afford it,'" she said. "The money is there; it's just not flowing to where it's needed. We urgently need donor governments to step up their contributions to IDA, and for the G20 to move forward with a global deal to tax the super-rich."
"It's all part of ensuring that rich countries and rich people pay their fair share," she added, "towards tackling inequality and climate breakdown."
Keep ReadingShow Less
20 Years Later, Abu Ghraib Torture Victims Get Their Day in Court
"Meanwhile, the U.S. government STILL hasn't provided compensation or other redress to people tortured by U.S. troops in Iraq," said one observer. "These three men are the lucky few."
Apr 15, 2024
Two decades after they were tortured by U.S. military contractors at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad, three Iraqi victims are finally getting their day in court Monday as a federal court in Virginia takes up a case they brought during the George W. Bush administration.
The case being heard in the U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Al Shimari v. CACI, was first filed in 2008 under the Alien Tort Statute—which allows non-U.S. citizens to sue for human rights abuses committed abroad—by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) on behalf of three Iraqis. The men suffered torture directed and perpetrated by employees of CACI, a Virginia-based professional services and information technology firm hired in 2003 by the Bush administration as translators and interrogators in Iraq during the illegal U.S.-led invasion and occupation.
"This lawsuit is a critical step towards justice for these three men who will finally have their day in court."
Plaintiffs Suhail Al Shimari, Asa'ad Zuba'e, and Salah Al-Ejaili accuse CACI of conspiring to commit war crimes including torture at Abu Ghraib, where the men suffered broken bones, electric shocks, sexual abuse, extreme temperatures, and death threats at the hands of their U.S. interrogators.
"This lawsuit is a critical step towards justice for these three men who will finally have their day in court. But they are the lucky few," Sarah Sanbar, an Iraq researcher at Human Rights Watch, wrote on Monday. "For the hundreds of other survivors still suffering from past abuses, their chances of justice remain slim."
"The U.S. government should do the right thing: Take responsibility for their abuses, offer an apology, and open an avenue to redress that has been denied them for too many years," Sanbar added.
U.S. military investigators found that employees of CACI and Titan Corporation (now L3 Technologies) tortured Iraqi prisoners and encouraged U.S. troops to do likewise. Dozens of Abu Ghraib detainees died in U.S. custody, some of them as a result of being tortured to death. Abu Ghraib prisoners endured torture ranging from rape and being attacked with dogs to being forced to eat pork and renounce Islam.
A May 2004 report by Maj. Gen. Anthony Taguba concluded that the majority of Abu Ghraib prisoners—the Red Cross said 70-90%— were innocent. In addition to thousands of men and boys, some women and girls were also jailed there as bargaining chips meant to induce wanted insurgents to surrender. Some of them said they were raped or sexually abused by their American captors; lesser-known Abu Ghraib photos show women being forced to expose their private parts. Some female detainees were reportedly murdered by their own relatives in so-called "honor killings" after their release.
Eleven low-ranking U.S. soldiers were convicted and jailed for their roles in the Abu Ghraib torture scandal. Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, the prison's commanding officer, was demoted. No other high-ranking military officer faced accountability for the abuse. Senior Bush administration officials—who had authorized many of the "enhanced interrogation techniques" used at prisons including Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay—lied about their knowledge of the torture. None of them were ever held accountable.
Bush's successor, former President Barack Obama, promised to investigate—and if warranted, to prosecute—the Bush-era officials responsible for the torture that had become synonymous with the War on Terror. Instead, the Obama administration protected them from prosecution.
In 2013, L3 Technologies agreed to pay $5.28 million to 71 former Abu Ghraib detainees who were subjected to sexual assault and humiliation, rape threats, electrical shocks, mock executions, brutal beatings, and other abuse.
The following year, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court ruling prohibiting Abu Ghraib torture victims from suing U.S. companies implicated in their abuse. But the court later reversed itself, finding the case had sufficient ties to the United States to be heard in an American court. The suit was later dismissed under the political question doctrine, which prevents courts from ruling on issues determined to be essentially political.
However, in 2016, a 4th Circuit panel ruled that "the political question doctrine does not shield from judicial review intentional acts by a government contractor that were unlawful at the time they were committed," allowing the Iraqis' case to proceed.
"This is a historic trial that we hope will deliver some measure of justice and healing for what President Bush rightly deemed disgraceful conduct that dishonored the United States and its values," CCR senior attorney Katherine Gallagher toldThe Guardian on Monday.
"In many ways, this case may be seen as setting a precedent for holding contractors accountable for human rights violations should they happen in other contexts, too," she added.
CACI—which denies any wrongdoing—has tried to get the case dismissed 20 times. The company still lands millions of dollars worth of U.S. government contracts. In February, Fortuneincluded the firm on its "World's Most Admired Companies" list for the seventh straight year.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Mehdi Hasan Launches Media Platform With Naomi Klein, Greta Thunberg, and More
The journalist says Zeteo will feature "hard-hitting interviews and unsparing analysis" in op-eds, podcasts, and streaming shows.
Apr 15, 2024
After a few weeks of "soft launch" mode, journalist Mehdi Hasan on Monday officially debuted his new media platform, Zeteo, and declared that "this is not a one-man band."
The former MSNBC and Peacock host—whose show was canceled in November and wrapped up in January, after his incisive criticism of Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip—revealed nine of the contributors he has lined up so far, calling them "some of the biggest, boldest, and best names from media, activism, entertainment, and beyond."
They are Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Spencer Ackerman, comedian and podcaster W. Kamau Bell, Palestinian Canadian lawyer Diana Buttu, former CNBC and CNN correspondent John Harwood, foreign policy analyst Rula Jebreal, author Naomi Klein, novelist Viet Thanh Nguyen, actor and activist Cynthia Nixon, and Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg.
"The tough interviews and knowledgeable analysis are all coming back, along with a global cast of contributors," Klein said on social media Monday. "I was honored when Mehdi asked me to be one of them, along with Rula Jebreal and Greta Thunberg and many others yet announced."
"Mehdi and I will be having a regular conversation called 'Unshocked,'" noted Klein, who authored The Shock Doctrine.
Hasan—who has also produced content for Al Jazeera, The Guardian, and The Intercept—has saidZeteo will feature "hard-hitting interviews and unsparing analysis" in a variety of forms, from op-eds and podcasts to streaming shows, beginning with "Mehdi Unfiltered."
"To keep Zeteo's journalism independent and free of advertiser and corporate influence," Hasan explained ahead of the formal launch, "and to allow us to continue investing in the future, we have to rely on our individual paid subscribers."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular