EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167 |
Time Magazine, U.S. Government Using Afghan Women to Sell War?
WASHINGTON - July 30 - The new Time magazine cover featuring a young Afghan woman with her nose
missing and the headline "What Happens If We Leave Afghanistan?" has
been challenged by many critics, including:
* FAIR -- "Time Magazine: We Cannot Leave Afghanistan"
* Greg Mitchell -- "What ALSO Happens If We Leave Afghanistan"
* Feminist Peace Network -- "Time Magazine Once Again Trots Out the Tired and Inexcusable 'We're in Afghanistan (and Have to Stay) to Protect Women' Mantra"
The following, who have focused on Afghan women, are available for interviews:
NAHID AZIZ [currently in France]
Available for a limited number of interviews, Aziz is an Afghan
woman who is a professor of clinical psychology at Argosy University in
Washington, D.C. She is also vice president of the group Afghan Education for a Better Tomorrow.
She has written several pieces on Afghan women for Psychologists for Social Responsibility.
SONALI KOLHATKAR
Kolhatkar is co-author of the book Bleeding Afghanistan: Washington, Warlords, and the Propaganda of Silence. She is also co-director of the Afghan Women's Mission, a U.S.-based nonprofit that supports women's rights activists in Afghanistan.
She said today: "This is the same type of justification that the
Soviets used (among others) to explain why they should remain in
Afghanistan: to save Afghan women from the 'backward' fundamentalists.
Foreign armies have always sought to protect Afghan women from violence
by fomenting violence themselves. But in the end, just like the Soviets
did backroom deals with radical misogynist groups, the U.S. has been
empowering non-Taliban misogynist fundamentalists since the start of
this war. There are incidents happening every day in Afghanistan of
women and girls being harassed, raped, flogged and killed by pro-U.S.
warlords and local commanders that are not working with the Taliban --
these incidents are rarely covered by the Western media. In many ways
the U.S. occupation has actually made things worse for Afghan women.
Afghan women activists I work with prefer to resist two threats to their
security (the Taliban and the U.S.-backed central government) instead
of three (the third being the U.S./NATO occupation) and have long called
for U.S. forces to leave. Time magazine is playing to age-old racist
stereotypes: that brown women need a foreign white army to save them
from their men."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

1 Comment so far
Show AllThe sooner we stop calling it a war, on terror or anything else, the sooner we will realize its about occupation.
Buckle up folks, the propaganda machine will reinvent reasons for the next 200 years.
The Grand US of A is in the occupation business, and where ever we decide terrorists or drugs are a problem, we will start a war.
You get picture.
End these wars now, and for Gods sake, we need all the Christians in the USA to help, because if they dont, there wont be any need for Christians or places of worship.
We will all just watch the TV evangelists preach the glory's of Holy war.
Jesus loved peace, not warranty less surveillance, the Patriot Act, torture, or War.
I know that, and I dont go to church any more, because the ministers stopped preaching the message of Jesus a long time ago, they preach what the government tells them too, oh yes they do.