Donate Today!

EMAIL SIGN UP!

 

Progressive Community

The press releases posted here have been submitted by

America's Progressive Community

For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 19, 2010
10:50 AM

CONTACT: Amnesty International - USA

Wende Gozan, 212-633-4247, wgozan@auisa.org

Amnesty International Urges French Politicians to Reject Face Veil Ban

‘Such Important Values As Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’ Cannot ‘Be Advanced by Such a Discriminatory Restriction’

LONDON - May 19 - Amnesty International is calling on French lawmakers to reject a draft law banning the wearing of full face veils in public that was adopted by the government and put before Parliament today.  

The proposal, which is being put forward by the French government after a prolonged public debate on the wearing of Islamic face veils, would prohibit the wearing anywhere in public of any form of clothing intended to conceal one’s face.  

"A complete ban on the covering of the face would violate the rights to freedom of expression and religion of those women who wear the burqa or the niqab in public as an expression of their identity or beliefs," said John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International's expert on discrimination in Europe.  “Much of the public debate in France has focused on the need to defend French Republican values.  Amnesty International does not believe that such important values as liberty, equality and fraternity can be advanced by such a discriminatory restriction.”

Breach of the law would be punishable by a fine of up to 150 Euros and/or the requirement to complete a community rehabilitation program. The move comes only a few weeks after the lower chamber of the Belgian parliament voted overwhelmingly in favor of a similar ban.  

The Council of State (Conseil d’Etat), France’s top legal advisory body, has already expressed serious reservations about the compatibility of such a general ban with the French constitution and the country’s obligations under international human rights law. “To ignore the advice of the Council of State on this issue would be to belie an indifference to human rights law in general and the rights of Muslim women who choose to wear full face veils in particular,” said Dalhuisen.

The French government has argued that the ban is necessary for public safety and to protect women from being pressured into wearing full face veils.  “Legitimate security concerns can be met by targeted restrictions on the complete covering of the face in well-defined high risk locations.  Individuals may also be required to reveal their faces when objectively necessary, for instance for identity checks.  French law already allows for such limited restrictions,” said Dalhuisen.  

States do have an obligation to protect women against pressure or coercion in their homes or communities to wear full face veils.  They should do this by taking steps to combat gender stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes and, where appropriate, by intervening in individual cases through criminal or family law. A generally applicable ban would restrict the rights of those who freely choose to wear full face veils, while punishing those who do so against their will.  

“For those women who are being coerced into wearing full face veils, the ban means they will either face state punishment if they go out in public – or more likely – they will be confined to their homes. This is counter-productive.” said Dalhuisen.  “Some people may well find the wearing of full face veils objectionable, or contrary to established social customs.  However, human rights law is quite clear on this – the disquiet of one person cannot be used to justify a restriction on the freedom of expression of another.”

Under international human rights law, restrictions on freedom of expression and the manifestation of religion or belief are permissible only when they are demonstrably necessary and proportionate for the achievement of certain specific purposes permitted by international law.  The only legitimate purposes for such restrictions are to protect certain public interests (national security or public safety, or public order, health or morals) or the rights of others.  Amnesty International does not believe that a complete ban on the wearing of full face veils in public is necessary to achieve any of these goals.  

Amnesty International France addressed a letter to the French Prime Minister on April 20 this year setting out the organization’s position on a generally applicable ban on the wearing of full face veils. Amnesty International France also contributed to the deliberations of the French National Consultative Commission on Human Rights and shares the position expressed in its opinion published on January 21, 2010, which opposes a general prohibition on the wearing of full face veils.   

###

We are people from across the world standing up for humanity and human rights. Our purpose is to protect people wherever justice, freedom, truth and dignity are denied. We investigate and expose abuses, educate and mobilize the public, and help transform societies to create a safer, more just world.



Comments

Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...