May, 18 2010, 05:27pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Diana Duarte, Media Coordinator,Phone: +1 212 627 0444,Email:,media@madre.org
Post-Earthquake Violence Against Women in Haiti: Failure to Prevent, Protect and Punish
WASHINGTON
MADRE is working as part of a coalition of organizations seeking
justice for women in Haiti. The coalition submitted the following
statement to the UN Human Rights Council for the upcoming session.
Coalition members include: MADRE KOFAVIV Bureau des Avocats Internationaux (BAI) Institute for Justice & Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) University of Virginia School of Law Human Rights Program Human Rights Litigation and Advocacy Clinic, University of Minnesota
Post-Earthquake Violence Against Women in Haiti: Failure to Prevent, Protect and Punish
- The
January 2010 earthquake not only devastated Haiti's frail
infrastructure, it also worsened already inadequate and inequitable
access to basic social services throughout Haiti. It also created a
severe crisis of safety and security - especially for those living in
the Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps - exacerbating the already
grave problem of sexual violence. - Women in Haiti are
disproportionately impacted by the earthquake, both because they face
gender discrimination, exposing them to higher rates of poverty and
violence; and because they are responsible for meeting the needs of the
most vulnerable, including infants, children, the elderly and the
thousands of newly disabled people. - From May 1-10, 2010,
a delegation of U.S. lawyers and a women's health specialist
investigated the prevalence and patterns of rape and other gender-based
violence (GBV) against IDPs in Port-au-Prince in the aftermath of the
earthquake and the governmental, inter-governmental, non-governmental
and grassroots responses to the violence. For firsthand knowledge of
the rapes in the camps, members of the delegation interviewed over 25
survivors of rape or attempted rape. These women and girls were
referred to the delegation by KOFAVIV and FAVILEK, grassroots women's
organizations working within Port-au-Prince. - Although
this report makes no attempt to quantify the rapes that have occurred
in the camps to date, one thing is clear - rapes in the camps are
dramatically underreported. From January 13-March 21, KOFAVIV tracked
230 incidents of rape in 15 camps in Port-au-Prince. There are over 500
camps in the capital. Medicins Sans Frontiers reported 68 cases of rape
in the month of April at one of their clinics in Port-au-Prince. The
vast majority of the women living in camps who were interviewed
reported being raped by two or more individuals, almost always armed
and at night. - There is a demonstrated lack of governmental
response to sexual violence occurring in the camps. This failure to act
appears to have two prongs - the Haitian government is both unwilling
and unable to respond. Rape survivors living in the camps told
interviewers that reporting rape to the police is an exercise in
futility since they could not identify their assailant or assailants.
Many women stated that when they approached the police for help, the
police said that there was nothing they could do and the survivor
should return when she had identified and/or captured their attacker.
One survivor reported that the officer she spoke with disclaimed
responsibility for trying to capture her rapist, telling her that it
was the problem of Haiti's president, Rene Preval. - Conditions
in the camps are bleak. Overcrowding, lack of privacy, weakened family
and community structures, among other things, render women and girls
particularly vulnerable to sexual violence. Women and girls live in
inadequate shelter, often sleeping under nothing more than a tarp or
blanket, with no means of protection and no friends close by, and bathe
in public, in view of men and boys. - Sexual assault
survivors interviewed spoke of widespread occurrence of transactional
sex to obtain food aid cards, although each interviewee denied having
engaged in transactional sex herself. The occurrence of coerced
transactional sex - a form of rape - is beyond the scope of this report
and merits an independent investigation. - Preventative
measures within the camps are critically lacking. In particular, the
survivors we spoke with noted the following issues, a number of which
were confirmed by our own visits to the camps: lack of lighting; lack
of private bathing facilities; lack of tents; and even for those with
tents, utter lack of security (at least one survivor stated that her
attacker had used a blade to cut the side of her tent to gain access);
lack of a police presence (many survivors stated that police only
patrolled the perimeter of the camps and were unwilling to enter the
interior, particularly at night). - Because most of the
camps were erected with little or no planning, patrolling the camps is
an onerous task and poses safety issues even for officers. Police are
unwilling to enter the camps because they fear the armed gangs who
generally are active at night when, due to the lack of lighting,
attackers are less likely to be seen or recognized. - Mechanisms
for redress following sexual violence appear to be lacking,
ineffective, or underutilized. In partnership with the Haitian
government, UNICEF, and NGOs postcards listing psychological and
medical follow-up support have been distributed in the camps. An
informal survey of listed clinics revealed that the card contained
inaccurate information, including out-of-service phone numbers and
incorrect street addresses. Furthermore, the cards were published in
French instead of Kreole, the predominantly spoken language in the
camps. The publication of misinformation could discourage survivors
from attempting to access such resources to the extent they have heard
from others that it is a waste of time. Additionally, not all staffing
and resources are adequate. At least one of the clinics did not provide
HIV prophylaxis or testing. Many survivors believed that even if they
knew of a clinic, they thought they could not afford services or the
cost of transportation. The publication of misinformation not only
hinders survivors from accessing critically needed resources but also
discourages women from attempting to obtain support. - Although
government officials cite a lack of authority and a lack of resources,
efforts must be made to maximize the resources that are available and
provide support to existing programs. The Haitian government should
support community-based anti-violence strategies within a human rights
framework. Haitian women's groups indicated that each of the
following measures could be helpful in increasing the security in the
camps: training programs for officers on GBV and human rights issues;
increasing the number of female police officers; instituting
self-defense training and rape whistle programs within the camps; and
providing various trainings as well as support to community-organized
security patrols. - Along with UNIFEM, two national women's
organizations, Kay Fanm and SOFA, are training the Haitian National
Police on protocol for receiving survivors and will be providing
survivors with transport needs for rapid response. They are also
working with students from the state university to hold self-defense
clinics in the camps. However, these efforts are not well-publicized.
Their impact could be greatly increased if the support of smaller,
grassroots organizations and the resources of NGOs were also brought to
bear. - The Haitian criminal justice system has never
effectively prosecuted rape cases. First, discriminatory practices
pervade the justice system, such as a refusal to credit women's
eyewitness testimony against a man's, discriminatory laws, and gender
imbalance at every level and unit of the justice system. Second, there
is limited access to justice for all women, especially poor women, who
are the majority of rape victims. Lastly, there is a lack of
specialized training and programs for rape prosecutions. This failure
to effectively prosecute denies victims justice, normalizes gender
violence and provides prospective perpetrators assurance of impunity. - We respectfully urge the Human Rights Council to recommend the following:
a.
That the Government of Haiti and other IGOs/NGOs coordinating the
relief effort allocate resources immediately to provide for increased
security and lighting in the camps.b. That the Government
of Haiti act immediately to implement the National Plan for Combating
Violence Against Women (2006-2011) and, upon its expiry, work to renew
a new and stronger national plan of action to eliminate violence
against women that includes legal measures, service programs, redress
and prevention strategies and encourages collaborative participation
with the civil sector for both drafting of a national plan and for
strategic and effective implementation.c. That the
Government of Haiti assess its current laws, policies and programs that
address violence against women; evaluate their compliance with
international obligations; remove discriminatory laws and practices
against women; and implement a legal and policy framework that
guarantees due diligence and promotes the full protection and promotion
of women's human rights.d. That the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women visit Haiti.
e.
That the Haitian and donor governments guarantee women's full
participation and leadership in all phases of the reconstruction of
Haiti as mandated by UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and other
internationally recognized standards.f. That the
Government of Haiti enact a systematic collection of data that
documents the prevalence and incidences of all forms of violence
against women in the IDP camps; in collaboration with civil society
organizations.
MADRE is an international women's human rights organization that partners with community-based women's groups to advance women's human rights, challenge injustice and create social change in contexts of war, conflict, disaster and their aftermath. MADRE advocates for a world in which all people enjoy individual and collective human rights; natural resources are shared equitably and sustainably; women participate effectively in all aspects of society; and all people have a meaningful say in policies that affect their lives. For more information about MADRE, visit www.madre.org.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular