May, 18 2010, 12:57pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jennifer Carnig, NYCLU, (212) 607-3363
Maria Archuleta, ACLU, (212) 519-7808 or 549-2666; media@aclu.org
John Garcia, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, (212) 739-7513
NYCLU, ACLU And LatinoJustice PRLDEF Challenge Unconstitutional Anti-Immigrant Ordinance On Behalf Of Day Laborer Groups
Oyster Bay, NY Law Restricts Free Speech Rights Of Day Laborers
NEW YORK
The
New York Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union and
LatinoJustice PRLDEF filed a lawsuit today on behalf of two day laborer
groups challenging an Oyster Bay town ordinance that violates the core
rights of free speech and equal protection under the law and is
intended to drive Latino immigrants from the community.
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de
Locust Valley and the Workplace Project, challenges an ordinance
enacted in September 2009 that prohibits standing on the sidewalk to
solicit employment and bars motorists from stopping to solicit
employment or hire workers. The Oyster Bay law, enacted in September
2009 purportedly to address traffic and pedestrian safety, criminalizes
a wide variety of constitutionally protected speech that presents no
threat to traffic safety, including, for example, students soliciting
cars for a high school carwash fundraiser.
"This misguided ordinance uses
public safety as a smokescreen for intolerance and violates the
constitutional rights of day labors and all Oyster Bay residents," said
Samantha Fredrickson, director of the NYCLU's Nassau County Chapter.
"It is a symptom of the anti-immigrant hostility that has swept across
Long Island and the country in recent years."
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of New York against the town of Oyster
Bay and Town Supervisor John Venditto, maintains that the ordinance
violates the First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
"The true purpose of this ordinance
is to prevent a group of predominantly Latino day laborers from making
a living in Oyster Bay," said Cesar Perales, president and general
counsel of LatinoJustice PRLDEF. "Day laborers are hardworking people
and provide a valuable service to this community that we are all part
of; their kids go to school here and they work, spend money and go to
church. But as a result of this law, many of them have lost the ability
to earn a living wage."
"Local attempts to regulate
immigration by passing ordinances that restrict free speech are
unconstitutional, ineffective and only drain state and local budgets
while hurting workers and local businesses," said Farrin Anello, an
attorney with the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "Standing on the
sidewalk to let people know that you are available for work is not a
crime. The Constitution protects all people in this country, regardless
of their background."
For nearly two decades, day laborers
have gathered in Oyster Bay, particularly the Hamlet of Locust Valley
and the Village of Farmingdale, to find work. Since passing the
ordinance, the town has stationed law enforcement officers at a corner
at which workers and contractors typically meet, keeping contractors
away from the site and intimidating workers seeking employment. The
ordinance has had a devastating effect on the workers, who typically
depend on these jobs to feed themselves and their families and
frequently lack transportation to seek work elsewhere.
"Oyster Bay's ordinance is hurting
families and it's hurting children," said Luz Torres of the Centro de
la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley. "These people have to work so
that they can feed, clothe and house their children, and they have the
right to talk to anyone they want."
In recent years, Latino day laborers
in Oyster Bay have endured harassment and intimidation from neighbors,
government officials and law enforcement when they gather to seek work.
In a 2006 survey by Hofstra University's Center for the Study of Labor
and Democracy, more than 43 percent of day laborers on Long Island
reported being targeted for slurs based on their nationality while more
than a quarter reported having been threatened while seeking work. When
residents of Farmingdale attempted to establish a hiring site for day
laborers, news reports indicated that someone had left a .50-caliber
anti-aircraft shell and carved the depiction of a gun in a picnic table
at the proposed location.
At the same time, Latino immigrants
across Long Island have increasingly faced discrimination, harassment
and violence. In November 2008, Ecuadorian immigrant Marcelo Lucero was
stabbed to death on Long Island following an altercation with local
teens who were specifically trolling for a Latino victim. In 2003, the
house of an immigrant in Farmingville was firebombed. Three years
earlier in the same town, two Mexican day laborers were brutally beaten
after being lured out of their home by the promise of work.
"Oyster Bay's discriminatory law is
promoting anger and distrust toward Latinos and contributing to an
environment where we feel like constant targets of harassment," said
Nadia Marin-Molina of the Workplace Project. "The town should do
everything in its power to ease tensions, not be fanning the flames of
hate by passing unconstitutional laws."
At a March 2009 Oyster Bay Town
Board meeting, several Oyster Bay residents complained of the "invasion
of day laborers," calling the workers "unsafe and unsightly." Following
the meeting, the Town Board introduced the ordinance. At a May 2009
public hearing on the proposed ordinance, several residents and local
lawmakers expressed displeasure with federal immigration policy. The
board approved the ordinance unanimously.
Local lawmakers and police officials
have never explained why current road safety laws - such as New York
State's vehicle and traffic laws - are inadequate to protect motorists
or pedestrians. At the public hearing, no resident or Oyster Bay Town
Board member indicated that a single traffic accident had occurred as a
result of a day laborer soliciting work. The legislative record on the
ordinance contains no evidence that the presence of day laborers causes
traffic problems.
Lawyers on the case, Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley et al. v. Town of Oyster Bay et al.,
are Corey Stoughton, Adriana Pinon and Arthur Eisenberg for the NYCLU;
Alan Levine and Christina Iturralde for PRLDEF; and Anello and Lee
Gelernt for the ACLU.
The complaint is online at: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/centro-de-la-comunidad-hispana-de-locust-valley-et-al-v-town-oyster-bay-et-al-comp
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular