May, 12 2010, 07:38am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Elliott Negin,Media Director,enegin@ucsusa.org
Energy Department's Annual Outlook Underscores Need for Strong Renewable Energy Policies, Touts Benefits of Fuel Economy Standards
WASHINGTON
The Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA) yesterday released its "Annual Energy Outlook 2010," which provides an
overview of the nation's current energy use and projects future energy
trends. Experts at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) took a close
look at the EIA's take on renewable energy and fuel economy.
According to Steve Clemmer, research director for the Climate and
Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), "A key
takeaway in the 'Energy Outlook' is that the renewable energy industry
is expanding steadily in all parts of the country. But these modest
gains are a tiny fraction of U.S. renewable energy and job creation
potential. On the eve of the release of the Kerry-Lieberman climate
bill, it's key to note that--if done right--comprehensive federal
legislation that puts a price on pollution, spurs renewable energy
development, and drives a cleaner transportation system could unleash
that potential.."
On the fuel-economy front, Clemmer's colleague in UCS's Clean
Vehicle Program, senior federal policy analyst Brendan Bell said,
"Fuel-economy standards are like an insurance policy against high gas
prices for consumers. The new automobile standards show that we can
save consumers billions of dollars at the pump--now we need to do the
same for big rig trucks."
Energy and transportation experts at the Union of Concerned
Scientists have reviewed the report and discuss some of the highlights
below.
ELECTRICITY SECTOR HIGHLIGHTS
Renewable energy growth eclipses bills in Congress: The EIA projects
that the percentage of U.S. electricity produced by non-hydro renewable
energy sources will increase from 4 percent in 2009 to 12.3 percent in
2030, compared to last's year projection of 11 percent in 2030. This
projected growth in renewable energy is due primarily to state
renewable electricity standards and federal tax credits included in
last year's stimulus bill that are set to expire as early as next year
for some renewable energy technologies. UCS estimates
that this "business as usual" renewable development will eclipse the
amount of clean energy developed in renewable electricity standards
currently proposed in Congress. Any serious national effort to increase
renewable energy capacity and create jobs means targets must be
strengthened considerably.
All parts of the nation will see renewable energy growth: The
"Energy Outlook" projects that renewable energy technologies (excluding
hydropower) will represent 41 percent of the new electric capacity
built between 2008 and 2035. EIA projects that new renewable energy
facilities will provide three times the capacity created by new coal
plants and nearly 11 times the capacity developed with new nuclear
plants. EIA projects that renewable energy will increase in all regions
of the country, including the Southeast. That region's renewable energy
capacity is expected to increase from 4,500 megawatts (MW) in 2009 to
17,300 MW by 2030. This growth is impressive compared with today's
levels, but it still falls well short of the region's true homegrown,
clean energy potential.
Recent studies show economic benefits from increasing renewable
electricity: A number of recent studies--including those by the
Department of Energy--show that a strong national renewable electricity
standard is feasible and affordable. A 2009 UCS analysis
found that the nation could meet a 25 percent by 2025 renewable
electricity standard, generate 300,000 new jobs, and save consumers
$64.3 billion on their electric and natural gas bills.
TRANSPORTATION SECTOR HIGHLIGHTS
Fuel-economy standards protect consumers from increasing fuel
prices: The "EIA Outlook" anticipates a 35-percent increase in gasoline
prices over the next decade, from $2.49 in 2010 to $3.34 in 2020 (in
2008 dollars). Using the EIA's fuel price projections, UCS estimates
drivers will save $46 billion in 2020--even after factoring in the cost
of vehicle technology improvements.
No fuel economy standards for big rigs means truckers will pay at
the pump: New federal fuel-economy standards do not apply to big rigs
and other heavy trucks, so the increases in fuel costs for these
vehicles will not be offset. A UCS analysis found that the average
medium- and heavy-duty truck could become at least 60 percent more fuel
efficient by 2030 by instituting a range of efficiency improvements,
including low-rolling resistance tires, advanced engines, and more
aerodynamic tractor and trailer designs. Using the EIA's fuel price
data, that level of fuel efficiency would save truckers $34 billion in
2030.
Clean biofuels will struggle to meet mandates: The "Energy Outlook"
starkly illustrates the failure of the cellulosic biofuels industry to
date. This year, the EIA projects cellulosic ethanol volumes will be 97
percent lower than the 100 million gallon mandate in the Renewable
Fuels Standard (RFS). Long-term commercialization of cellulosic
biofuels lags behind RFS targets by a decade.
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
Joe Lieberman, Iraq War Cheerleader and Killer of Public Option, Dead at 82
"Joe Lieberman's legacy will live on as your medical debt."
Mar 27, 2024
While current and former officials across the U.S. political spectrum shared praise for and fond memories of former Sen. Joe Lieberman in response to news of his death on Wednesday, critics highlighted how some of his key positions led to the deaths of many others.
Lieberman's family said the 82-year-old died at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital after a fall at his home in the Bronx. He served in the Connecticut Senate, as the state's attorney general, and in the U.S. Senate—initially as a Democrat and eventually as an Independent. He was also Democratic former Vice President Al Gore's running mate in the 2000 presidential election.
"Up until the very end, Joe Lieberman enjoyed the high-quality, government-financed healthcare that he worked diligently to deny the rest of us. That's his legacy," said Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, which advocates for universal, single-payer healthcare.
As Warren Gunnels, majority staff director for Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.),
explained, "Joe Lieberman led the effort to ensure the Affordable Care Act did not include a public option or a reduction in the Medicare eligibility age to 55."
Noting that Lieberman also lied about the presence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq—which was used to justify the 2003 U.S. invasion—Gunnels asked, "How many people unnecessarily died as a result?"
He was far from alone in highlighting the two defining positions.
The Lever's David Sirota declared, "RIP Joe Lieberman, Iraq War cheerleader who led the fight to make sure Medicare was not extended to millions of Americans who desperately needed the kind of healthcare coverage he enjoyed in the Senate."
The Debt Collective said on social media that "Joe Lieberman killed so many people when he killed the public option. Not to mention all the people he killed by cheerleading every war and every lie that led to war. A truly horrible person with a shameful legacy."
Journalist Jon Schwarz pointed out that Lieberman continued to lie about the WMDs long after the claims were debunked.
FormerMSNBC host Mehdi Hasan noted that Lieberman declined an opportunity to apologize for the disastrous war, sharing a clip from his on-camera interview with the ex-senator in 2021.
And please don\u2019t give me this \u2018don\u2019t speak ill of the dead\u2019 stuff - 1) I\u2019m not speaking ill, I\u2019m stating facts, and 2) public figures are public figures, and their obits reflect their legacies and so we should be honest in our accounts of their legacies. Not offensive but honest— (@)
"We lost a giant today. I often disagreed with Joe Lieberman but he was always honorable in the way he called for American troops to murder people abroad so he could get his jollies," said Matt Stoller of the American Economic Liberties Project in a series of sarcastic social media posts.
"Joe Lieberman balanced his love of other people fighting in immoral wars with a commitment to preventing Americans from getting healthcare," Stoller added. "Even after his Senate career, he showed his strong democratic values by lobbying for Chinese telecom firms. We will miss this man."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Enough Is Enough': Ireland Joins ICJ Genocide Case Against Israel
"What we saw on October 7 in Israel, and what we are seeing in Gaza now, represents the blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale," said one top Irish official.
Mar 27, 2024
Citing Israel's "blatant" human rights violations in Gaza, Ireland's second-highest-ranking official said Wednesday that the country will join the South Africa-led genocide case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
Irish Tánaiste Micheál Martin—the equivalent of a deputy prime minister in other parliamentary nations—said that Ireland decided to intervene in the case after analyzing the "legal and policy issues" pertaining to the case under review by the United Nations' top court.
"It is for the court to determine whether genocide is being committed," Martin—who also serves as Ireland's foreign and defense minister—said in a statement. "But I want to be clear in reiterating what I have said many times in the last few months; what we saw on October 7 in Israel, and what we are seeing in Gaza now, represents the blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale."
Martin continued:
The taking of hostages. The purposeful withholding of humanitarian assistance to civilians. The targeting of civilians and of civilian infrastructure. The indiscriminate use of explosive weapons in populated areas. The use of civilian objects for military purposes. The collective punishment of an entire population.
The list goes on. It has to stop. The view of the international community is clear. Enough is enough. The U.N. Security Council has demanded an immediate cease-fire, the unconditional release of hostages, and the lifting of all barriers to the provision of humanitarian assistance at scale. The European Council has echoed this call.
South Africa's case—which is supported by over 30 countries, the Arab League, African Union, and others—incisively details Israel's conduct in the war, including the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, mostly women and children; the wounding of tens of thousands more; the forcible displacement of 90% of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million people; and the inflicting of conditions leading to widespread starvation and disease. The filing also cited numerous genocidal statements by Israeli officials.
On January 26, the ICJ issued a preliminary ruling that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza and ordered its government and military to prevent genocidal acts. Palestinian and international human rights defenders say Israel has ignored the order, pointing to more than 30,000 men, women, and children killed or wounded in Gaza since January 26.
A draft report
released this week by the U.N.'s Human Rights Council found "reasonable grounds to believe" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a move that came on the same day as the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire in the ongoing war.
"The situation could not be more stark; half the population of Gaza face imminent famine and 100% of the population face acute food insecurity," said Martin. "As the U.N. secretary-general said as he inspected long lines of blocked relief trucks waiting to enter Gaza during his visit to Rafah at the weekend: 'It is time to truly flood Gaza with lifesaving aid. The choice is clear: surge or starvation.' I echo his words today."
In a St. Partick's Day White House meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden—a staunch supporter of Israel—Irish Toaiseach (Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar, who announced earlier this month that he would soon step down, said that "the Irish people are deeply troubled about the catastrophe that's unfolding before our eyes in Gaza."
"And when I travel the world, leaders often ask me why the Irish have such empathy for the Palestinian people," he added. "And the answer is simple: We see our history in their eyes—a story of displacement, of dispossession and national identity questioned and denied, forced emigration, discrimination, and now hunger."
Keep ReadingShow Less
House Democrat Calls GOP Budget a 'Blueprint for a Dystopian Hellscape'
Rep. Don Beyer warns the plan "would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
Mar 27, 2024
As Republicans on Wednesday set their sights on a key seat opening up in the U.S. House of Representatives, the chamber's senior Democrat on the congressional Joint Economic Committee put out a blistering takedown of a top GOP budget proposal for the next fiscal year.
Congressman Don Beyer (D-Va.) took aim at the 180-page "Fiscal Sanity to Save America" plan released last week by the Republican Study Committee (RSC)—which includes about 80% of GOP House members—following proposals from Democratic President Joe Biden and House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas).
"The Republican Study Committee budget is a blueprint for a dystopian hellscape," he warned. "The vision offered by this group, which counts 4 in 5 House Republicans as members, would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
RSC proposals to "dramatically weaken healthcare," Beyer noted, include turning Medicare into a voucher plan and rolling back Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions that cut costs for seniors; repealing tax subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and the law's protections for people with preexisting conditions; and transforming Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program into block grants to states.
As Common Dreams has reported, in addition to seeking cuts to Medicare and Social Security—while claiming to do nothing of the sort—the RSC has also launched a full-fledged assault on reproductive healthcare and rights, promoting 42 bills that would ban abortions after 15 weeks or even earlier, require unnecessary ultrasounds and 24-hour waiting periods, prohibit the use of fetal stem cells for research, and threaten access to in vitro fertilization, among other restrictions.
In addition to attacking reproductive freedom and key programs for seniors and low-income families, Beyer highlighted, the RSC wants to "weaken public health, public safety, and environmental protections," while "cutting taxes for the wealthy, by a lot."
The RSC advocates ending green tax credits from the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act as well as slashing money for Community Oriented Policing Services and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The committee also calls for permanently lowering taxes for the ultrarich, indexing capital gains taxes to inflation, repealing the estate tax, rolling back the IRA's corporate alternative minimum tax, and eliminating funding intended to help the Internal Revenue Service catch wealthy tax cheats.
"Democrats believe there is a better way to get our fiscal house in order without betraying our values," said Beyer. "That starts with making smart investments in our people and our future while demanding that the rich and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. The contrast between the Democratic approach and this Republican budget could not possibly be clearer."
Biden's budget blueprint—released as he prepares for an electoral rematch against former Republican President Donald Trump, who infamously cut taxes for rich people and corporations—proposes a 25% minimum tax for individuals with wealth of more than $100 million, along with ending capital income tax breaks and closing other loopholes.
Polling results released Tuesday by Morning Consult show that a majority of voters across party lines in key swing states support raising taxes on people who make more than $400,000 per year.
Biden and the divided Congress this past weekend narrowly avoided a government shutdown by passing a long-delayed spending package. Fiscal year 2025 is set to begin in October, setting up another election-year fight over funding.
In what's been
dubbed the "Great Resignation," a growing number of House Republicans have announced that they are not seeking reelection or even exited their seats early—shrinking the party's already slim majority in the lower chamber.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular