April, 14 2010, 09:15am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sarah Dransfield, Oxfam Press Officer on +44 (0) 1865 472269,
+44
(0)7767 085636 or sdransfield@oxfam.org.uk
Rich Country Donors Still Well Off-Track on Their Aid Commitments
The 2009 overseas aid figures, released today, show that rich countries are failing to deliver on their promises to poorer countries.
LONDON
Today's figures, from the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), show that
although there has been a fraction of an increase in total aid, from
$122 to $123 billion, the amount of aid has actually fallen by $3.5
billion when compared with last year's prices. This comes at a time when
the World Bank forecasts that 50,000 more children in Sub-Saharan
countries may have died this year because of the financial crisis.
Max Lawson of Oxfam said: "This lackluster performance from donors is
not close to meeting the needs of poor countries, who are suffering now
from the impact of the economic crisis. It is a scandal that more than
half of rich nations have cut their aid this year and are giving less of
their income than last year - just 31 cents in every hundred dollars."
Forty years ago* rich countries pledged to spend 0.7 per cent
of their annual national incomes in development aid. And so far, just
five nations, all European - Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Luxembourg and the
Netherlands - have actually reached the target.
Today's figures show that some donors have increased aid,
demonstrating that even in hard economic times this is possible where
there is political will to meet international commitments.
Lawson said, "Whilst some countries like the UK and Belgium have made
efforts to increase aid, others are really letting the side down.
Italy's aid spending has plunged by a massive 31 per cent, Ireland's by
18.9 per cent, Germany's by 12 per cent, Japan by 10.7 per cent and
Canada by 9.5 per cent."
"Its crunch time. More aid is vital now to reach the
Millennium Development Goals by 2015, and world leaders must rebuild
their credibility on the global stage before its too late. All rich
countries must commit to timetables to meet 0.7, backed by national
binding legislation, when they meet at the UN summit in September to
review their progress on MDGs."
Delivered well, aid saves lives. In Nepal
development aid has been pivotal in dramatically improving healthcare,
with a series of reforms including abolishing health fees. Since 2006
the under-five mortality rate has reduced by 22 per cent, neo-natal
mortality by 38 per cent and maternal mortality has fallen by 19 per
cent. In fact maternal mortality has now fallen by 58 per cent in the
country since 1996 - a towering success.
New research published on Monday** revealed that maternal deaths have
fallen worldwide, from over half a million a year in 1980 to less than
350,000 in 2008.
"The heartening fall in global maternal mortality comes in large part
because of well-targeted aid spending. It is unconscionable for rich
countries to fail on aid promises when there are such rich rewards to be
won in the fight against poverty," said Lawson.
A new Oxfam report, "21st Century Aid," recognizing success and
tackling failure, to be published later this month, will call on donors
to meet their aid commitments, and do more to improve quality of aid.
Oxfam is calling for donors to commit to legally binding legislation and
national timetables to reach at least 0.7 per cent of their national
income in aid, and ensure all aid is aimed at meeting poverty reduction
goals.
Notes to editors
* In 1970 the UN General Assembly committed to
providing 0.7% of Gross national product in aid. This was
recommitted to by rich countries attending the 2002 Monterrey Consensus
on Financing for Development, and at the G8 meeting in Gleneagles in
2005 where European members of the G8 also recommitted to reaching the
0.7% target, by 2015.
**According to a study published in the Lancet.
- Aid levels from G8 member countries Canada and Japan
have dropped, by 10.2 per cent and 9.5 per cent respectively. - Aid from the United States registered a small
increase from 0.19 to 0.20 per cent of GDP. - The United Kingdom remains on target for its
aid commitments, reporting a jump from 0.43 per cent of GDP in 2008 to
0.52 per cent in 2009. - France has increased its aid from 0.39 per cent
to 0.46 per cent of GDP.
After debt relief is deducted the increase in aid from 2008 to 2009
was better, but still way off track to meet promised increases.
European Union 15 Member States pledged to spend 0.7 per cent of their
GNI on aid by 2015. EU 12 Member States committed to spend 0.33% of
their GNI on aid by 2015. The collective EU target for next year is to
provide 0.56% of GNI in aid by 2010. The EU is off track to meet this
target.
Some donors have increased the percentage of aid given, but are actually
spending less.
- Aid from the Netherlands rose slightly as a
percentage of the economy, but actual spend fell by nearly $600 million. - Spain's aid rose from 0.45 to 0.46 as a
percentage of GDP but its actual spend fell by $200 million, a
disappointing record for the country holding the Presidency of the
European Union. - Although both Sweden and Luxembourg gave
over 1% of GNI, the actual amount given was less than in 2008.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
'Shameful': Columbia Greenlights Police Crackdown on Anti-War Encampment
Even after dozens of students were arrested, hundreds "rushed to take the place of their classmates" and continued the protest.
Apr 18, 2024
The arrests of dozens of Columbia University and Barnard College students on Thursday "galvanized" other supporters of Palestinian rights on the campuses, as hundreds of students occupied the school's western lawn after New York City police filled at least two buses with protesters who had been detained for setting up an encampment.
"Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," chanted hundreds of students as they marched around the area where organizers had set up a tent encampment early Wednesday morning.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik informed the campus community on Thursday that she had authorized the police to clear the encampment.
As it has been in the past, the school has become a center of anti-war protests—and crackdowns by school officials and the police—since Israel began its bombardment of Gaza in October.
Pro-Palestinian students and alumni have demanded that Columbia divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid policies in the occupied Palestinian territories and cancel its dual degree program with Tel Aviv University.
In response to pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Columbia in November suspended the campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine—an action that pushed the New York Civil Liberties Union and Palestine Legal to file a lawsuit on behalf of the students last month.
On Thursday, police and Columbia employees took down about 50 tents that had been up for more than a day and disposed of them in trash cans and alleyways—but The New York Times reported later that "demonstrators repitched a couple of tents, and ... recovered the main signage from the encampment as well," while hundreds of students were "still gathered and chanting on the south side of the grass."
The arrests came a day after Shafik testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce about antisemitism on campus.
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose daughter, Isra Hirsi, was among the Barnard students who were suspended on Thursday for participating in the encampment protest, questioned Shafik about whether antisemitic protests have actually taken place at Columbia, prompting the president to say there have not.
"There has been a rise in targeting and harassment against anti-war protesters, because it's been pro-war and anti-war protesters is what it seems, like, correct?" asked Omar.
"Correct," replied Shafik.
On Thursday, Omar posted on social media two images of protesters at Columbia: one from the encampment this week, and one from 1968, when students protested the U.S. war in Vietnam.
New York City Council member Tiffany Cabán was among those who condemned the university's crackdown on the protests on Thursday.
"Suspending and arresting Columbia/Barnard student activists and disbanding student organizations—including Jewish students and organizations—doesn't combat antisemitism or increase safety," said Cabán. "All it does is punish and intimidate those who believe in human rights for Palestinians. Shameful."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Pressure Is Working': Biden Weighs Climate Emergency Declaration
Campaigners urged the president to "keep listening to the millions of young, people of color, and working-class voters who are demanding climate policy that meets the moment."
Apr 18, 2024
The youth-led Sunrise Movement on Thursday celebrated Bloombergreporting that "White House officials have renewed discussions about potentially declaring a national climate emergency."
The Wednesday revelation came just two days after six young activists were arrested outside Vice President Kamala Harris' Los Angeles, California home to increase pressure on the Biden administration to make such a declaration, which would unlock various federal powers to combat the fossil fuel-driven global crisis.
According to Bloomberg:
Top advisers to President Joe Biden have recently resumed talks about the merits of such a move, which could be used to curtail crude exports, suspend offshore drilling, and curb greenhouse gas emissions, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be named because a final decision has not been made.
White House advisers are divided over the idea of declaring a climate emergency, with some saying it wouldn't provide Biden with enough newfound authority to make substantial changes, the people said. Others, however, argue such an announcement would galvanize climate-minded voters.
"The pressure is working. Let's keep it up," Sunrise said on social media, highlighting some of what Biden—who claimed last year that "practically speaking," he had already declared a national climate emergency—could do with a real declaration.
Sunrise wasn't alone in welcoming the news. The Center for Popular Democracy (CPD) Action said that "we've BEEN calling for a climate emergency!! Now, the White House is considering declaring one."
The group urged Biden to "keep listening to the millions of young, people of color, and working-class voters who are demanding climate policy that meets the moment."
As Biden and Harris have campaigned for reelection in November—when they are expected to face former Republican President Donald Trump, whose plan for the planet is "drill, baby, drill"—the Democrats have faced intense pressure from campaigners including members of CPD and Sunrise to step up their climate actions.
"I'm on the frontlines raising my voice for my Black and Latine families and friends, because I know that we deserve to have affordable housing and healthcare, we deserve an administration who will fight for us, but instead of declaring a climate emergency, we are seeing Biden and Harris expand oil and gas production to record levels," 18-year-old Ariela Lara, who was arrested at Harris' house, said Monday.
Climate campaigners have praised the Biden administration for parts of the Inflation Reduction Act and a recent pause on liquefied natural gas exports but blasted the president for skipping last year's United Nations summit, continuing fossil fuel lease sales, and enabling the Mountain Valley Pipeline, Willow oil project, and construction of the nation's largest offshore oil terminal.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Blinken Hasn't Ended Aid for Israeli Military Units Tied to Killings, Rapes
"Blinken continues a very long American tradition of very selective enforcement of human rights laws," said one critic.
Apr 18, 2024
Amid global condemnation of Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip and the Biden administration's complicity, ProPublicarevealed Wednesday that U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has for months ignored staff recommendations to cut off American aid to Israeli military and police units accused of human rights violations including killings and rapes.
"The incidents under review mostly took place in the West Bank and occurred before Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel," which was the catalyst for the current Israeli escalation in Gaza, reported ProPublica's Brett Murphy. "They include reports of extrajudicial killings by the Israeli Border Police; an incident in which a battalion gagged, handcuffed, and left an elderly Palestinian American man for dead; and an allegation that interrogators tortured and raped a teenager who had been accused of throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails."
Murphy obtained government documents and emails and spoke with current and former U.S. State Department officials, who said the recommendations from the Israel Leahy Vetting Forum—named for former Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who authored laws restricting aid to human rights abuses—were sent to Blinken in December and "they've been sitting in his briefcase since then."
While U.S. President Joe Biden has gradually increased his criticism of Israeli forces killing civilians in Gaza, "multiple State Department officials who have worked on Israeli relations said that Blinken's inaction has undermined Biden's public criticism, sending a message to the Israelis that the administration was not willing to take serious steps," Murphy wrote.
The Israeli government did not respond to the reporter's request for comment, but a U.S. State Department spokesperson did. "This process is one that demands a careful and full review," the American representative said, "and the department undergoes a fact-specific investigation applying the same standards and procedures regardless of the country in question."
Global critics have long accused the U.S. government of giving Israel special treatment while Israeli officials and troops subject Palestinians to apartheid, ethnic cleansing, occupation, settler colonization, and now "plausibly" genocide, according to the International Court of Justice. Since October, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have killed at least 33,970 people in Gaza.
The reporting sparked a fresh wave of outrage. The U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights declared that "this is how Antony Blinken will go down in history: for enabling Israel to commit the gravest of war crimes with U.S. tax dollars."
Alex Kingsbury, a member of The New York Times editorial board, noted that "Blinken continues a very long American tradition of very selective enforcement of human rights laws," while Brandon Friedman, a former Obama administration official, said that "this would be a career ender for a normal Cabinet secretary under normal circumstances."
Democracy for the Arab World Now "submitted Leahy sanctions requests for two of the Israeli units that Antony Blinken has putzed and punted on, in breach of U.S. law, despite clear evidence of despicable abuses—[including] torture, executions, and even murder of an American," according to executive director Sarah Leah Whitson. "But Antony Blinken insists on special privileges and exemptions for Israel, refusing to hold it accountable, U.S. law be damned."
@StateDept In 2023, we documented Israel counter-terrorism YAMAM unit\u2019s abuses, including two extrajudicial killings & two indiscriminate and reckless killings, including of a child in Jenin in March 2023, constituting gross violations of human rights under Leahy Law & war crimes under Rome\u2026— (@)
The Council on American-Islamic Relations' Robert S. McCaw said in a statement that "despite these internal report State Department reports detailing egregious human rights abuses by the Israeli government, including allegations of rape and torturing children in the West Bank, Secretary Blinken has ignored his own staff and continued to greenlight weapon shipments to the responsible Israeli military and police units."
"The glaring disconnect between the gravity of the accusations and his refusal to act on them is deeply disturbing," McCaw added. "Secretary Blinken must halt any further weapons transfers that the Israeli government will use to commit more human rights violations."
Human rights attorney Qasim Rashid pointed out that in contrast with how the Biden administration has treated Israel, the U.S. government pulled funding from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East—as Palestinians in Gaza starve to death—over the "mere allegation" that a small number of staff were involved with Hamas.
"If we had been applying Leahy effectively in Israel like we do in other countries, maybe you wouldn't have the IDF filming TikToks of their war crimes now because we have contributed to a culture of impunity," Josh Paul, a former director in the State Department's Bureau of Political-Military Affairs and a member of the forum who resigned in protest in October, told Murphy.
Another State Department official, Annelle Sheline, stepped down late last month as a foreign affairs officer at the Office of Near Eastern Affairs in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. She said that with the U.S. government continuing to arm Israel as it devastates Gaza, "trying to advocate for human rights just became impossible."
Sheline's resignation came just days after the Biden administration accepted Israeli government assurances that its use of U.S.-supplied weapons complies with international law—which human rights advocates and officials worldwide, including some congressional Democrats, have challenged over the past few weeks.
Over two dozen Democrats wrote Wednesday to Blinken and two other top officials that "we remain concerned by the stark differences and gaps in the statements being made by the State Department and White House on how Israel has not been found to be in violation of international humanitarian law, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or when it comes to the provision of humanitarian assistance, which are contradictory to those made by prominent experts and global institutions."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular