April, 02 2010, 01:55pm EDT
DHS Report Confirms Serious Civil Rights Problems With Local Immigration Enforcement Program
ACLU Calls For Immediate Termination Of ICE 287(g) Program
WASHINGTON
A report from the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) reveals
several critical problems surrounding Immigration and Customs
Enforcement's (ICE) 287(g) program, which allows certain state and local
law enforcement agencies to engage in federal immigration enforcement
activities.
The
American Civil Liberties Union has strongly opposed the 287(g) program,
believing it has led to illegal racial profiling and civil rights abuses
while diverting scarce resources from traditional local law enforcement
functions and distorting immigration enforcement priorities. The OIG
report affirms these concerns, and the ACLU calls for the immediate
termination of the 287(g) program.
American Civil Liberties Union has strongly opposed the 287(g) program,
believing it has led to illegal racial profiling and civil rights abuses
while diverting scarce resources from traditional local law enforcement
functions and distorting immigration enforcement priorities. The OIG
report affirms these concerns, and the ACLU calls for the immediate
termination of the 287(g) program.
"The
DHS OIG report confirms in detail what the ACLU has known for many years
- that the 287(g) program, fundamentally flawed and incompetently
administered, presents serious civil rights and civil liberties problems
for U.S. citizens and immigrants," said Joanne Lin, ACLU Legislative
Counsel. "ICE has completely shirked its legal duty to train and
supervise 287(g) officers and has instead unleashed a slew of
unmonitored state and local law officers across America - many of whom
are using federal immigration authority as a cloak to engage in racial
profiling. The program should be terminated and de-funded."
DHS OIG report confirms in detail what the ACLU has known for many years
- that the 287(g) program, fundamentally flawed and incompetently
administered, presents serious civil rights and civil liberties problems
for U.S. citizens and immigrants," said Joanne Lin, ACLU Legislative
Counsel. "ICE has completely shirked its legal duty to train and
supervise 287(g) officers and has instead unleashed a slew of
unmonitored state and local law officers across America - many of whom
are using federal immigration authority as a cloak to engage in racial
profiling. The program should be terminated and de-funded."
The
report finds lack of oversight, training and other failures in the
287(g) program and makes it clear that the program does not have
adequate safeguards against racial profiling and other civil rights
abuses. Many state and local agencies accepted for the program have a
documented history of serious allegations of constitutional violations.
report finds lack of oversight, training and other failures in the
287(g) program and makes it clear that the program does not have
adequate safeguards against racial profiling and other civil rights
abuses. Many state and local agencies accepted for the program have a
documented history of serious allegations of constitutional violations.
Under
the 287(g) program, ICE has failed to:
the 287(g) program, ICE has failed to:
- establish
appropriate performance measures and targets to determine whether
program results are aligned with program goals; - develop
guidance for supervising ICE officers; - provide
adequate 287(g) program oversight; - establish
a thorough review and selection process for law enforcement agencies
requesting to participate in the 287(g) program; - establish
data collection and reporting requirements to address civil rights and
civil liberties concerns; - provide
adequate 287(g) training programs; - provide
accurate and honest program information to Congress and the public; and - standardize
287(g) officers' access to DHS information systems.
"The
287(g) program, as this latest report confirms, all but abandons the
constitutional guarantees of fair treatment and due process, and
encourages racial and ethnic profiling. Immigration enforcement must
respect civil liberties, and it's clear the current 287(g) program does
not come close," said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington
Legislative Office. "The 287(g) program also undermines public safety by
exacerbating fear of the police in communities already distrustful of
law enforcement."
287(g) program, as this latest report confirms, all but abandons the
constitutional guarantees of fair treatment and due process, and
encourages racial and ethnic profiling. Immigration enforcement must
respect civil liberties, and it's clear the current 287(g) program does
not come close," said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington
Legislative Office. "The 287(g) program also undermines public safety by
exacerbating fear of the police in communities already distrustful of
law enforcement."
The
report outlines how local agencies exploited the 287(g) program's
defects to engage in systemic civil rights abuses. Although an ICE fact
sheet describes how the 287(g) program does not allow state and local
agencies to perform "random street operations," the OIG report describes
how one agency improperly engaged in "random street operations" to
target "minor offenses and violations of local ordinances," while
claiming to act under their 287(g) agreement. In addition, although
287(g) officers are only authorized to use federal immigration authority
to take people into custody as a result of violating state or local
criminal law, the OIG report found incidents of immigrants being
arrested for federal immigration violations without prior arrests on
state or local charges.
report outlines how local agencies exploited the 287(g) program's
defects to engage in systemic civil rights abuses. Although an ICE fact
sheet describes how the 287(g) program does not allow state and local
agencies to perform "random street operations," the OIG report describes
how one agency improperly engaged in "random street operations" to
target "minor offenses and violations of local ordinances," while
claiming to act under their 287(g) agreement. In addition, although
287(g) officers are only authorized to use federal immigration authority
to take people into custody as a result of violating state or local
criminal law, the OIG report found incidents of immigrants being
arrested for federal immigration violations without prior arrests on
state or local charges.
"The
OIG report's message is clear," said Cecillia Wang, managing attorney of
the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "ICE can no longer stand by idly
while local agencies use their 287(g) agreements as cover to engage in
the rampant abuse of people's constitutional rights. People in 287(g)
communities should have the right to go about their business without
being stopped for no other reason than that they 'look foreign' to a
police officer."
OIG report's message is clear," said Cecillia Wang, managing attorney of
the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "ICE can no longer stand by idly
while local agencies use their 287(g) agreements as cover to engage in
the rampant abuse of people's constitutional rights. People in 287(g)
communities should have the right to go about their business without
being stopped for no other reason than that they 'look foreign' to a
police officer."
The
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General's report is
available at: www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG_10-63_Mar10.pdf
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General's report is
available at: www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG_10-63_Mar10.pdf
The
ACLU's submitted testimony on the 287(g) program can be found at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/39062leg20090304.html
ACLU's submitted testimony on the 287(g) program can be found at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/39062leg20090304.html
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
GOP State AGs Ask EPA to 'Eviscerate' Crucial Environmental Justice Tool
"Many of the states that have signed the petition have historically allowed these harmful facilities to be placed in predominantly Black and brown communities," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
Led by Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, Republican leaders in 23 states on Tuesday filed a petition making clear their aim to allow petrochemical companies and other corporations to continue operating pollution-causing facilities without regard for the "disparate impact" they can have on low-income communities of color.
The attorneys general of states including Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas wrote to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan, asking him to amend Title VI under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The law prohibits recipients of federal funds from discriminating against residents based on race and national origin and allows residents to petition the EPA arguing that state agencies have intentionally discriminated or disparately impacted a particular community.
Title VI has underpinned hundreds of legal cases, including recent EPA investigations into the 85-mile stretch of land in Louisiana known as Cancer Alley, where dozens of petrochemical plants have been built and health experts have observed a disproportionate number of cancer cases and other medical problems among the predominantly Black population.
The attorneys general said they object to the Biden administration's use of Title VI to "advance what it calls 'environmental justice,'" and complained that the EPA aims to create "a condition in which no racially or economically defined group experiences adverse environmental impacts."
Andre Segura, vice president of litigation at the environmental legal group Earthjustice, said Wednesday that the Republican attorneys general aim to "eviscerate civil rights protections just to make it easier for industrial polluters to continue with business as usual."
"Everyone should be alarmed by these outrageous efforts," said Segura. "The fact is, many of the states that have signed the petition have historically allowed these harmful facilities to be placed in predominantly Black and brown communities, without regard for the health and safety of residents."
Manuel Fernandez, president of Miami-Dade County Democrats in Florida, said the effort was "embarrassing" and called on Moody to resign.
The petition was filed three months after U.S. District Court Judge James Cain Jr., an appointee of former President Donald Trump in Louisiana, ruled that Title VI requirements amount to "government overreach."
The EPA halted its Title VI investigation into the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) last year a month after Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a Republican, sued the agency over its Title VI regulations. The EPA had been probing whether the LDEQ placed the historically Black town of St. John the Baptist Parish at risk by allowing companies to build petrochemical plants nearby.
There are more than 50 pending cases regarding Title VI violations, Earthjustice said.
"These decades-old Title VI regulations are critical tools for the federal government to use to ensure that funding is not used to perpetuate this toxic legacy," said Segura, "and the EPA should swiftly reject this petition."
Keep ReadingShow Less
GOP Governors Show 'How Scared They Are' of Workers Organizing With UAW
Congressman Greg Casar said the Republicans behind a new joint statement "sound more like corporate lobbyists than governors."
Apr 17, 2024
As Volkswagen workers in Tennessee began voting on whether to join the United Auto Workers, progressive critics on Wednesday continued to call out six Southern GOP governors for jointly saying they "are highly concerned about the unionization campaign driven by misinformation and scare tactics that the UAW has brought into our states."
Govs. Kay Ivey of Alabama, Brian Kemp of Georgia, Tate Reeves of Mississippi, Henry McMaster of South Carolina, Bill Lee of Tennessee, and Greg Abbott of Texas issued their statement in response to "the largest organizing drive in modern American history," which the UAW launched after major contract wins following a strike targeting the Big Three automakers—General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis—last year.
"As governors, we have a responsibility to our constituents to speak up when we see special interests looking to come into our state and threaten our jobs and the values we live by," the Republican leaders said, claiming that "unionization would certainly put our states' jobs in jeopardy" and the UAW is "making big promises to our constituents that they can't deliver on."
"We have serious reservations that the UAW leadership can represent our values. They proudly call themselves democratic socialists and seem more focused on helping President [Joe] Biden get reelected than on the autoworker jobs being cut at plants they already represent," the governors added, nodding to the union's January endorsement of the Democrat—UAW president Shawn Fain also called the presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, a "scab."
What actually threatens American workers?\n\u274c Anti-union, anti-worker propaganda like this\n\ud83d\udcb0 Corps that put profits over people\n\u26d1\ufe0f Safety standards not being met\n\n@GovAbbott & @GovernorKayIvey sound more like corporate lobbyists than governors here. @UAW backs American workers!— (@)
The Economic Policy Institutesaid Wednesday that the governors' anti-union statement "clearly shows how scared they are that workers organizing with UAW to improve jobs and wages will upend the highly unequal, failed anti-worker economic development model of Southern states."
Responding to the statement on social media, the Congressional Labor Caucus declared that "we speak up when we see threats to workers' rights. Workers must be allowed to choose whether to form a union on their own—free from influence from their employers or politicians. Shame on these governors for putting out this anti-union propaganda."
After Ivey shared the statement on social media, Nina Turner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy, asked, "Better wages and working conditions are against the values of your state?"
MSNBC's Chris Hayes was even snarkier, jokingly calling the statement "yet more evidence of the populist, pro-worker turn of the Trump-era GOP."
The UAW vote in Chattanooga, Tennessee is set to wrap up on Friday. Then, attention is expected to shift to Vance, Alabama. Workers at a nonunion Mercedes-Benz plant there submitted a petition to the National Labor Relations Board earlier this month requesting an election to join the union.
Noting Ivey's social media post about the statement, Diana Hussein, who does communications work for the UAW, said: "She's mad cuz she wants to keep the Alabama discount that leaves workers behind. No more! #StandUpUAW."
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, also took aim at Ivey, saying, "You used Alabama taxpayers' money to have state troopers escort out-of-state scabs to break the strike of YOUR constituents."
Nelson explained that she was referring to the "hardworking" United Mine Workers of America members employed by Warrior Met, "who were fighting for the right to see their families more than a few days a year."
More Perfect Union told Ivey that "unions only threaten your values if you value denying workers a living wage and good benefits."
In contrast with the Republican governors, around two-thirds of the Senate Democratic Caucus in January wrote to 13 nonunion automakers—including Mercedes and Volkswagen—urging them not to illegally block UAW organizing at their plants.
"We are concerned by reporting at numerous automakers that management has acted illegally to block unionization efforts," the senators stressed, citing multiple examples. "These retaliatory actions are hostile to workers' rights and must not be repeated if further organizing efforts are made by these companies' workers. We therefore urge you all to commit to implementation of a neutrality agreement at your manufacturing plants."
Welcoming their letter, Fain said that "every autoworker in this country deserves their fair share of the auto industry's record profits, whether at the Big Three or the Nonunion 13. We applaud these U.S. senators for standing with workers who are standing up for economic justice on the job."
"It's time for the auto companies to stop breaking the law and take their boot off the neck of the American autoworker," the union leader added, "whether they're at Volkswagen, Toyota, Tesla, or any other corporation doing business in this country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular