Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167 |
Pressure on Israel?
WASHINGTON - March 23 - Tonight, President Obama is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On Monday, Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton and Netanyahu were among the speakers at the annual conference
of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
ANDREW BACEVICH
Professor of history and international relations at Boston University, Bacevich is an author whose latest book is The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism.
He recently wrote the piece "How Petraeus could swing thinking on Israel: His belated recognition that U.S. and Israeli interests aren't always intertwined has particular impact," which states: "How long the United States can tolerate the denial of Palestinian self-determination is one question demanding urgent attention. Yet behind that question there lurks an even larger one: Is the progressive militarization of U.S. policy in the Greater Middle East -- entrusting ever more authority to proconsuls like Gen. Petraeus and flooding the region with American troops -- contributing to peace and stability? Or is it producing precisely the opposite result?"
RAE ABILEAH
Abileah is a national organizer with CODEPINK and a Jewish-American of Israeli descent who interrupted Netanyahu's remarks Monday night. See: "CODEPINK Protests Netanyahu inside AIPAC Gala: Activists call for end to siege on Gaza and illegal settlements."
Earlier Monday, a spoof news release distributed by CODEPINK, saying that AIPAC had called for an Israeli settlement freeze, was reported as fact by NPR and other major media.
PHYLLIS BENNIS
Bennis is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. Her books include Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Primer. Bennis said today: "Despite a campaign commitment to making a two-state solution real, which would require real pressure to make Israel comply with international law, the Obama administration's policy towards settlements has largely been limited to a series of polite requests of Israel. Request: 'Please freeze settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze just a few settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze just a few settlements, just for a little while.' Answer: 'Maybe ... well ... no.' Then they stopped asking.
"Someone seems to have told the Obama administration that a series of polite requests equals pressure. It doesn't. Real pressure looks like this: 'Please stop settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Then, you know that $30 billion that Bush arranged for you from U.S. tax money, and we agreed to pay -- you can kiss that goodbye.' That's what pressure looks like."
ANDREW BACEVICH
Professor of history and international relations at Boston University, Bacevich is an author whose latest book is The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism.
He recently wrote the piece "How Petraeus could swing thinking on Israel: His belated recognition that U.S. and Israeli interests aren't always intertwined has particular impact," which states: "How long the United States can tolerate the denial of Palestinian self-determination is one question demanding urgent attention. Yet behind that question there lurks an even larger one: Is the progressive militarization of U.S. policy in the Greater Middle East -- entrusting ever more authority to proconsuls like Gen. Petraeus and flooding the region with American troops -- contributing to peace and stability? Or is it producing precisely the opposite result?"
RAE ABILEAH
Abileah is a national organizer with CODEPINK and a Jewish-American of Israeli descent who interrupted Netanyahu's remarks Monday night. See: "CODEPINK Protests Netanyahu inside AIPAC Gala: Activists call for end to siege on Gaza and illegal settlements."
Earlier Monday, a spoof news release distributed by CODEPINK, saying that AIPAC had called for an Israeli settlement freeze, was reported as fact by NPR and other major media.
PHYLLIS BENNIS
Bennis is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. Her books include Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Primer. Bennis said today: "Despite a campaign commitment to making a two-state solution real, which would require real pressure to make Israel comply with international law, the Obama administration's policy towards settlements has largely been limited to a series of polite requests of Israel. Request: 'Please freeze settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze just a few settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze just a few settlements, just for a little while.' Answer: 'Maybe ... well ... no.' Then they stopped asking.
"Someone seems to have told the Obama administration that a series of polite requests equals pressure. It doesn't. Real pressure looks like this: 'Please stop settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Then, you know that $30 billion that Bush arranged for you from U.S. tax money, and we agreed to pay -- you can kiss that goodbye.' That's what pressure looks like."
###
Comments are closed


2 Comments so far
Show Allgeneral marshall also realized that israel would be more a strategic liability than a strategic asset. george marshall nearly resigned when truman told him he would recognize israel. truman did so in may of 1948, but only because his former partner in haberdashery was jewish and his 1948 reelection campaign was near at hand. george marshall knew that israel would cause us tons of trouble in the long run. he knew that the arabian peninsula was no place for a sectarian state of immigrants, smack dab in a land full of arabs. the fighting there has always been a source of instability to the world, both in military and economic terms. we've had two oil embargoes levied against our economy because of our support of israel, and now that rogue nation of 7 millon is armed to the teeth with a nuclear arsenal that includes hydrogen and neutron warheads as well as conventional atomic bombs. an evenhanded u.s. policy in the middle east would have vitiated even the possibility of 9/11. israel has put us into a position of having to threaten war against countries seeking to achieve about 10% of the arsenal that the israelis have long held. if we had had good relations with the arabs, oil prices would have been lower and our economy would not have suffered as many jolts as it has felt over the last 30 years or so. israel serves no purpose but to keep the whole world holding its breath, wondering if that enfant terrible will start w.w.3 if ever endangered with defeat by conventional armies. because of its small numbers and desire to ethnically cleanse its neighborhood, israel has started using chemical weapons against its enemies, namely white phosphorous and uranium tipped shells, both of which cause severe birth defects. no politician has the guts to stand up to israel, including kucinich. even entertainer bill maher, who ridicules religion and denigrates most of society's sacred cows, will not utter a single negative word about the zionist sate. imagine how soon he would be off the air if he started pointing out that israel is an oppressive state. oh, and bill has also bragged recently about how he has taken michael moore to task for the latter's critique of capitalism. now, there's a real limousine liberal for you!
general marshall also realized that israel would be more a strategic liability than a strategic asset. george marshall nearly resigned when truman told him he would recognize israel. truman did so in may of 1948, but only because his former partner in haberdashery was jewish and his 1948 reelection campaign was near at hand. george marshall knew that israel would cause us tons of trouble in the long run. he knew that the arabian peninsula was no place for a sectarian state of immigrants, smack dab in a land full of arabs. the fighting there has always been a source of instability to the world, both in military and economic terms. we've had two oil embargoes levied against our economy because of our support of israel, and now that rogue nation of 7 millon is armed to the teeth with a nuclear arsenal that includes hydrogen and neutron warheads as well as conventional atomic bombs. an evenhanded u.s. policy in the middle east would have vitiated even the possibility of 9/11. israel has put us into a position of having to threaten war against countries seeking to achieve about 10% of the arsenal that the israelis have long held. if we had had good relations with the arabs, oil prices would have been lower and our economy would not have suffered as many jolts as it has felt over the last 30 years or so. israel serves no purpose but to keep the whole world holding its breath, wondering if that enfant terrible will start w.w.3 if ever endangered with defeat by conventional armies. because of its small numbers and desire to ethnically cleanse its neighborhood, israel has started using chemical weapons against its enemies, namely white phosphorous and uranium tipped shells, both of which cause severe birth defects. no politician has the guts to stand up to israel, including kucinich. even entertainer bill maher, who ridicules religion and denigrates most of society's sacred cows, will not utter a single negative word about the zionist sate. imagine how soon he would be off the air if he started pointing out that israel is an oppressive state. oh, and bill has also bragged recently about how he has taken michael moore to task for the latter's critique of capitalism. now, there's a real limousine liberal for you!