March, 19 2010, 09:59am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Trip Pollard, Land & Community Program Director,
804-343-1090.
Morgan Butler, Senior Attorney, 434-977-4090.
Cat McCue, Senior Communications Manager 434-977-4090
Environmental Groups Go to Court to Counter Virginia Attorney General's Effort to Block Action on Climate Change
WASHINGTON
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's
challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's finding that
greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare is an unwarranted
stall tactic, and a dangerous distraction from grappling with the
damaging impacts of climate change already in evidence in coastal
Virginia, said two environmental groups in a filing with the
U.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
The Southern Environmental Law Center, on behalf of the Norfolk-based
Wetlands Watch, late yesterday filed a motion to intervene on the side
of the EPA in the attorney general's lawsuit against the agency, filed
last month. The overwhelming body of scientific evidence going back
several decades supporting EPA's determination that carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, coupled with the
long-standing practice of courts deferring to agencies on matters
within their areas of expertise, render the legal merits of
Cuccinelli's challenge highly questionable, said SELC senior
attorney Morgan Butler.
"It's disturbing that our state attorney general chooses to challenge
the mountain of evidence, considering the number of Virginia
businesses and residents experiencing firsthand the consequences from
rising sea level and other impacts of a changing global climate,"
Butler said.
"Ask anyone trying to get insurance on their home or business in
tidewater if something is changing. Ask long-time residents how
high the floodwaters rose in their grandparents' time, and where the
last floods reached," said Skip Stiles, executive director with
Wetlands Watch. Stiles said that over the last century, Virginia has
had the highest rate of sea-level rise of any Atlantic coast state,
according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Virginia stands to lose 50-80% of its remaining tidal wetlands, much
of its oceanfront, and hundreds of square miles of low-lying land from
predicted rates of sea level rise, he said.
Clay Lory, a long-time owner and resident of tidal waterfront property
on a peninsula surrounded by the waters of the Lafayette River in
Norfolk, is a declarant in the motion. "The scientific calculations of
the rise of water levels this century does not bode well for my
property, Norfolk, or for eastern Virginia. I am very concerned about
the actions of Attorney General Cuccinelli in his attempt to stall and
prevent the EPA from taking immediate action to reduce the levels of
manmade greenhouse gases."
Following a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that greenhouse gases meet
the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants, the EPA began the
process of determining whether they endanger public health and
welfare, as required by the law. The agency reviewed a voluminous
amount of scientific data and considered some 380,000 public comments
on the issue, and in December announced a final determination that
greenhouse gases contribute to a changing climate, with consequences
such as severe flooding from sea level rise, more intense storms, and
increased ground-level ozone that threaten public health.
At his press conference last month, Cuccinelli made much of being
among the first states to file a legal challenge against the federal
government on this issue, and cited the controversy over leaked emails
of a handful of climate scientists as his reason for questioning the
EPA's endangerment finding. In so doing, Cuccinelli is undercutting
his own state's effort to examine how climate change is affecting
Virginia's citizens and economy, and to identify actions the state and
localities should take to address it.
"Mr. Cuccinelli is taking a politicized, polarizing position, when we
should be focusing on solutions," said Trip Pollard, director of
SELC's Land & Community Program and a member of the 2008
Governor's Commission on Climate Change. "We may not know every detail
about climate change, but the evidence we have makes it clear we must
act-especially since reducing these emissions will also promote energy
independence, a healthier environment, and new jobs."
The last time Virginia took EPA to court to challenge its authority
under the Clean Air Act, it lost, at taxpayers' expense. In the
1990s, the state attorney general sued EPA in an attempt to preserve
unlawful restrictions on citizens' right to challenge certain state
permitting decisions. The attorney general's office lost in the
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, and its petition for U.S. Supreme Court
review was denied. Such legal fights can cost between
$350,000and $500,000.
Prior to Cuccinelli's lawsuit on February 16, the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce and others had already challenged the EPA finding, and more
than a dozen states and several environmental groups have moved to
intervene on EPA's side. Texas and Alabama also filed challenges the
same day as Virginia, and now numerous states have asked to intervene
on that side. Yesterday was the deadline to file motions to intervene.
The cases have been consolidated by the DC Circuit. If granted
intervenor status by the court, SELC and others will be full parties
to the litigation.
###
The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using
the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the
Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and
Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent
more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy,
air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands,
transportation, and land use.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular