Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) Lisa Nurnberger, 202-331-6959 |
Nobel Prize-Winning Scientists and Economists Call On Senate to Address Climate Change Now
More Than 2,000 Say Delay Will Worsen Consequences and Drive Up Costs
WASHINGTON - March 11 - Nobel Prize-winning economists and scientists will deliver a letter to the U.S. Senate today, urging lawmakers to require immediate cuts in global warming emissions. The letter was signed by more than 2,000 prominent U.S. economists and climate scientists, including eight Nobel laureates, 32 National Academy of Sciences members, 11 MacArthur "genius award" winners, and three National Medal of Science recipients.
"The nation's leading scientists and economists have joined together to tell policymakers that we agree about the urgency of addressing climate change now," said James McCarthy, one of the letter's organizers and a biological oceanography professor at Harvard University. "The bad news is the science of climate change is indisputable. The good news is we can cost-effectively cut the emissions that are causing it."
McCarthy is a former president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the chairman of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) board, and a leader of the Nobel Peace Prize winning U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The longer the United States waits to address climate change, the more expensive it will be to reduce emissions and adapt to its effects, according to the letter, which among its signatories includes five Nobel Prize-winning economists.
One of those economists is Eric Maskin, a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. "The economic and social costs of global warming could be huge," Maskin said. "We need to act now to limit them."
Maskin and McCarthy were joined this morning in a telephone press conference by Alan Robock, a meteorology professor at Rutgers University, and U.S. Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.).
"As a scientist who has worked on this issue for my entire career -- more than a third of a century -- I can tell you every year of continued greenhouse gas emissions will lock us into larger widespread climate changes, with major negative consequences for most people on our planet," said Robock, a contributor to the Nobel Peace Prize winning U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Sen.
Udall, who sits on both the Senate's Environment and Public Works
Committee and the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, said
Congress must make energy and climate legislation a top priority. "In
addition to protecting public health and the environment," he said,
"comprehensive legislation
Today's letter was issued partly as a response to escalating attacks on climate science and disinformation about the costs of addressing global warming.
"In the economic emergency we are experiencing, some people think that we cannot afford to address the problem of climate change," said another letter signatory, Elinor Ostrom, an Indiana University professor and a Nobel Prize-winner in economics. "It's the other way around. If we don't act now, we will run into even greater economic problems in the future."
The letter, which was signed by 2,026 economists and climate scientists, concludes with the recommendation that the United States reduce global warming emissions "on the order of 80 percent below 2000 levels by 2050" and that the first step should be reductions on the order of 15 to 20 percent below 2000 levels by 2020.


5 Comments so far
Show AllI'm glad I voted for Tom Udall. It's refreshing to actually have intelligent lawmakers from my state. On another note, you can choose to believe the ones who say the earth is flat, Tom Freidman etal, or you can choose to believe the ones with the facts, Union of Concerned Scientists.
"In the economic emergency we are experiencing, some people think that we cannot afford to address the problem of climate change," said another letter signatory, Elinor Ostrom, an Indiana University professor and a Nobel Prize-winner in economics. "It's the other way around. If we don't act now, we will run into even greater economic problems in the future."..
The business model currently in use is "disaster capitalism" described in Klein's book, Shock Doctrine.
The power elite see no need to respond in any rational way to the risks we face from CC since they see themselves profitting from the chaos and destruction that will be unleashed.
The effects of climate change will, most likely, be of the kind that produce conditions in which profit is unlikely, if not irrelevent. No other species I know of has a profit-based survival mode.
If the recent runup in income inequality is an attempt to assure class survival by those who can pull it off, they may want to re-think their faith in wealth alone. A strong, sturdy society probably offers a better hope for all.
When North America is overrun with immigrants seeking water from an arid South America, then perhaps the politicians will take notice.
When people with actual skills are recognized as those to run the nation, then perhaps we will have an America again.
When the people of the world finally realize that we're all in this together: " Hang together or hang separately,'" then perhaps the world as we once knew it, will have a chance.
In the meantime, take a cue from Ray Bradbury, and memorize the best parts of the best books produced by each civilization. If that's all that we can leave to future generations, then perhaps homo sapiens might have a chance.
Hey, there's a lot of money to be made with relocating folks from drowned islands, transporting of mega-tons of water melted from the poles, rebuilding cities after hurricanes...oh, wait, they didn't do that...must have not been enough money in it yet, and still so much money to be made by the MIC to insure that Americans can drive their cars to small wart to buy their chinese shit. Ya, it all sucks, I hear this huge crushing noise in my nightmares as the world just folds in on itself. Can't wait to watch '2012' and cheer for all the stupid bastards that can't see what's coming. Mormons will go to the stars, Muslims will get their virgins, Christians will be impailed on crosses in hell, atheists will find a bar in heaven, and Buddhists will have a river to haul water from...OOOMMMMM....
Oh, BTW, I hear that the 2012 thing ISN't about climate change, but hey, DO YOU REALLY KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING???
I thought 'Day After' would scare some sense into people, but no, sigh....