Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Electronic Frontier Foundation Phone: +1 415 436 9333 Email: press@eff.org |
New "Smart Meters" for Energy Use Put Privacy at Risk
SAN FRANCISCO - March 10 - The ebb and flow of gas and electricity into your home contains surprisingly detailed information about your daily life. Energy usage data, measured moment by moment, allows the reconstruction of a household's activities: when people wake up, when they come home, when they go on vacation, and maybe even when they take a hot bath.
California's PG&E is currently in the process of installing "smart meters" that will collect this moment by moment data—750 to 3000 data points per month per household—for every energy customer in the state. These meters are aimed at helping consumers monitor and control their energy usage, but right now, the program lacks critical privacy protections.
That's why EFF and other privacy groups filed comments with the California Public Utilities Commission Tuesday, asking for the adoption of strong rules to protect the privacy and security of customers' energy-usage information. Without strong protections, this information can and will be repurposed by interested parties. It's not hard to imagine a divorce lawyer subpoenaing this information, an insurance company interpreting the data in a way that allows it to penalize customers, or criminals intercepting the information to plan a burglary. Marketing companies will also desperately want to access this data to get new intimate new insights into your family's day-to-day routine–not to mention the government, which wants to mine the data for law enforcement and other purposes.
This isn't just a California issue. Many threats to the privacy of the home—where our privacy rights should be strongest—were detailed in a 2009 report for the Colorado Public Utility Commission. The federal government has been promoting the smart grid as part of its economic stimulus package, and last year, EFF and other groups warned the National Institute of Standards and Technology about the privacy and security issues at stake. For example, security researchers worry that today’s smart meters and their communications networks are vulnerable to a variety of attacks. There are also questions of reliability, as PG&E faces criticism from California customers who have seen bills skyrocket after the installation of the new "smart meters." Unsurprisingly, California legislators are questioning the rapid rollout. Texas customers are also complaining.
There are far more questions than answers when it comes to this new technology. While it's potentially beneficial, it could also usher in new intrusions into our home and private life. The states and the federal government should ensure that energy customers get the protection they deserve.

1 Comment so far
Show AllIt's not just a question of privacy, as I asked my meter reader what will happen to his job. He was told that most people will be reassigned...I suppose that "most" is the operative word here. What do the "least ' get then?
With fewer employees, will our bills come down? Why do I think not.
Will these meter signals create havoc for any other electrical devices?
I can hardly wait until a clever soul figures out how to roll the meters back.
If Enron were still around, would this be a benefit for them? If so, how could it be a benefit for us?
As of now, if there is an error on my bill, I can read the meter myself. Will the ghost in the machine be living inside of each one? If so, what happens when " the ghost" makes a mistake?
Finally, why should any entity, besides the electric company, be a party to any of our user information? If the electric entities insist in selling our information, shouldn't we all get free electricity for invasion of privacy and selling of our "selves?" May, we the taxpayers, insist on taking the "sold souls" money and sending it to the candidate of our choice? Why should non-human corporation 'people' have all the fun and all the marbles?