February, 04 2010, 01:46pm EDT
Kenya: Landmark Ruling on Indigenous Land Rights
African Human Rights Commission Condemns Expulsion of Endorois People for Tourism Development
NEW YORK
A ruling by the African Commission on Human and People's Rights
condemning the expulsion of the Endorois people from their land in
Kenya is a major victory for indigenous peoples across Africa, Human
Rights Watch, WITNESS, and the Endorois' lawyers said today. The
Commission ruled on February 4, 2010 that the Endorois' eviction from
their traditional land for tourism development violated their human
rights.
The Kenyan government evicted the Endorois people, a traditional
pastoralist community, from their homes at Lake Bogoria in central
Kenya in the 1970s, to make way for a national reserve and tourist
facilities. In the first ruling of an international tribunal to find a
violation of the right to development, the Commission found that this
eviction, with minimal compensation, violated the Endorois' right as an
indigenous people to property, health, culture, religion, and natural
resources. It ordered Kenya
to restore the Endorois to their historic land and to compensate them.
It is the first ruling to determine who are indigenous peoples in
Africa, and what are their rights to land. The case was brought on
behalf of the Endorois by CEMIRIDE and Minority Rights Group International.
"The Endorois decision, the first of its kind, can help many others
across Africa who have been forced from their homes," said Clive
Baldwin, senior legal adviser at Human Rights Watch, who was co-counsel
for the Endorois in the case while employed with Minority Rights Group
International. "The African Commission is clear: the land where the
Endorois historically lived is their property and must be returned to
them."
Lake Bogoria is considered to have great tourism potential due to
its hot springs and abundant wildlife, including one of Africa's
largest populations of flamingos. The African Commission accepted the
Endorois' evidence that they have lived there since "time immemorial"
and the lake was the center of their religion and culture, with their
ancestors buried nearby. After being evicted from the fertile land
around the lake, the Endorois were forced to congregate on arid land,
where many of their cattle died.
They tried unsuccessfully to persuade the Kenyan government, the
local authorities, and the Kenyan Wildlife Service to reverse their
policy of evicting everyone, including traditional inhabitants, from
areas the government designated national parks and reserves. They were
also rebuffed when they sought an adequate share of the tourism and
revenues generated by the reserve. After Kenyan courts refused to
address their case, they brought their case to the African Commission
in 2003. As a component of the case, WITNESS and CEMIRIDE collaborated
on a landmark use of video as evidence,
demonstrating how conditions on the ground breached articles of the
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, and bringing voices of
the Endorois to the Commission.
Violations of land rights, including the rights of the generations
of Kenyans displaced through historic and recent evictions, are one of
the key unresolved issues in Kenya, which former United Nations
Secretary-General Kofi Annan acknowledged in the aftermath of Kenya's
electoral violence in 2007-2008. The African Commission found that the
Kenyan government has continued to rely on a colonial law that
prevented certain communities from holding land outright, and allowed
others, such as local authorities, effectively to own their traditional
land on "trust" for these Communities. The local authority in Lake
Bogoria was able to end the Endorois trust at will and to seize the
land.
In the last decade there have been several attempts at comprehensive
land reform that would allow for final and fair determination of land
ownership and create a system to restore land to those unlawfully
evicted or to compensate them. None of these reforms has been
completed. While the adoption by the government of a new land policy in
August 2009 marks a significant step forward, it still needs to be
translated into effective protection on the ground for Kenya's most
marginalized.
"This ruling is good for every Kenyan," said Korir Singo'ei, who
represented the Endorois while director of CEMIRIDE. "The law that
treats some communities as children, unable to own their own land, is a
colonial relic that needs to be changed."
The African Commission determined that the Endorois, having a clear
historic attachment to particular land, are a distinct indigenous
people, a term contested by some African governments who claimed all
Africans are indigenous. It also found that the Endorois had property
rights over the land they traditionally occupied and used, even though
the British and Kenyan authorities had denied them a formal title. In
finding a violation of the right to development for the first time the
Commission relied on the failure of the Kenyan authorities to respect
the right of the Endorois to consent to development, and the failure to
provide them adequate compensation for the loss they had suffered, or
any benefit from the tourism.
The African Commission had ruled in 2006 against the Kenyan
government for allowing a ruby mining company to start illegal mining
on another part of the Endorois' land, severely affecting their
remaining access to water. Following that ruling, the mining company
abandoned its activities.
"The African Commission's ruling makes clear to governments that
they must treat indigenous peoples as active stakeholders rather than
passive beneficiaries," said Cynthia Morel, who was co-counsel for the
Endorois as senior legal adviser with Minority Rights Groups
International. "That recognition is a victory for all indigenous
peoples across Africa whose existence was largely ignored - both in law
and in fact - until today. The ruling spells the beginning of a
brighter future."
The Commission requires Kenya to take steps to return the Endorois
land and compensate them within three months. Comprehensive reform to
bring Kenya's land laws to the standards set by the Commission is vital
before the 2012 elections, Human Rights Watch, WITNESS, and the
Endorois' lawyers said.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular