EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Friends of The Earth Eric Hoffman, 202-222-0747, ehoffman@foe.org
Kelly Trout, 202-222-0722, ktrout@foe.org |
Landmark Trial About Patenting Humans Begins Today
NEW YORK - February 2 - The
American Civil Liberties Union’s challenge of patents on two human
genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer goes to
trial here today.
Around 20 percent of the human
genome has been patented by private interests. The trial, which begins
today, seeks a ruling on whether such patents violate the Patent Act
and the Constitution. The defendant, Myriad Genetics, holds the patents
to two human genes and charges $3,000 for its tests to determine
whether the genes are present in individuals. These patents prevent
other researchers from exploring connections between these genes and
breast and ovarian cancer, or to come up with more effective and
affordable tests.
Eric Hoffman, genetic engineering policy campaigner for Friends of the Earth, praised the ACLU for bringing the case to trial.
“Genetic material is the basis for
all life. It has existed since the beginning of the living world,”
Hoffman said. “The human genome is shared by all human beings, varying
by only a fraction of a percent between people. This makes human
genetic material a common good. Scientists are only beginning to
understand the complexity of the human genome and by granting ownership
over genes, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has limited the
ability of scientists and health researchers to learn more about our
bodies. This limits progress in fields that have the potential to
benefit the health of all people.”
The trial beginning today is just
one challenge confronting the corporations that are patenting human
genes. Federal legislation, the “Genomic Research and Accessibility
Act,” is soon expected to be introduced by Representative Xavier
Becerra (D-CA). This bill prohibits the patenting of naturally
occurring genes (nucleotide sequences), their functions, and their
naturally occurring products, which the United States Patent and Trade
Office has permitted since 1994.
“The Patent Office has erred in
allowing corporations to patent parts of our bodies. We welcome
Representative Becerra’s efforts to change this,” Hoffman said.
###
Comments are closed
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

2 Comments so far
Show AllMy name is Doug and I felt compelled to make a comment on this article discussing patent issues of genes - in particular human genes.
For many years I have been involved in distributing and selling controls and instrumentation to industries in many of the states of the USA. The result was a lot of tours through the processes of "making stuff". So I was kind of like the guy on that TV show "how it's made". Patent law is something that goes one step further than manufacturing of course. It was not uncommon for me to sign secrecy agreements as I had to review details of processes in order to specify instrumentation and equipment. I must abide by keeping my mouth shut about certain things, but can talk about some.
So that's a blob on being qualified to comment.
The world is accelerating - this article is a perfect example. I would like to express to those people that feel overwhelmed at times as to the pace of change in our world today. It really is a downer - and no wonder that for those of us who question things and learn things and have an open mind - it seems every one is on antidepressants.
We are all dealing with this acceleration of change and you are not alone.
With that said, one of the biggest sources of uneasy feelings for me is that the overwhelming attention people are giving to patents these days is above my head. I want to know more and I don't.
I urge someone to post and educate me and others about the basics of patent law - hopefully in a way you can even educate a knucklehead like myself.
I get the fact that genetic stuff is being patented - infact, I've had talks at length with managers of agribusiness about their patent intentions - things I was not suposed to hear. It was right then I knew that this "patent business" was just that - a business dedicated to nothing other than obtaining patents - as many as the law could tolerate.
So I feel uneasy about this realm which I am starting to hear so much about - patenting some things, I feel should not be allowed.
So someone please explain how patents are developed, proofed, applied for, who reviews the patent paperwork, how long does the process take, what can be patented at this point - what can't, is there known corruption in the process, what are penalties for infringement, how do you invalidate a patent, when do the expire etc etc etc.
Please advise so I can align my beliefs and mind so as to start a foundation for my learning of the subject and it's scope in today's accelerating world.
In my opinion patenting anything that is a eucriotic cell is not OK with me.
When are we going to stop meddling with nature? Already we are starting to pay a steep price for doing so and yet...we'll continue as long as money can be made.