Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: United for a Fair Economy Lee Farris, UFE Estate Tax Policy Coor., 617-423-2148 x133 (off); lfarris@faireconomy.org Brian Miller, UFE Executive Director, 781-392-4564 (cell); bmiller@faireconomy.org |
Waging Class Warfare - The Rich Win Again
BOSTON - December 31 - On New Year's Day, the estate tax, which has been part of the US tax system for nearly 100 years, will disappear due to the failure of the Senate to pass an extension in December. Now, Congressional leaders are pledging to act in early 2010 to reinstate the federal estate tax, making it retroactive to January 1, 2010, an action supported by United for a Fair Economy (UFE).
"The Senate's failure to extend the estate tax is the epitome of fiscal irresponsibility, coming at a time when our country is struggling to recover from a deep recession," states Brian Miller, UFE's executive director. "Permanent repeal of the estate tax would increase the federal deficit by $1.3 trillion dollars over 10 years. Those taxes would likely be shifted from multi-millionaire inheritors to the middle class, at a time when middle-class families are already losing their jobs and homes. That's outrageous."
The estate tax has been cut five times since 2001. As of 2009, it is paid only on the portion of an individual's estate over $3.5 million, or $7 million for a couple. As a result, over 99% of all estates are unaffected by the estate tax. Very few farms or small businesses are impacted at the 2009 level either, collectively making up less than 1% of all estate tax collections. Those estates that are affected only pay taxes on the portion of the estate above the exemption, not the full value of the estate. "The 2009 law is already generous enough. We oppose any effort to further weaken it," states Miller.
"Providing for one's children and grandchildren is a good thing. No one is questioning that," adds Miller, "But how much is enough? Since there is zero tax on the first $7 million left by a wealthy couple under 2009 law, an heir can conceivably inherit more, tax free, than the average American earns in four whole lifetimes. Isn't that enough? And unlike the lucky heir, the working American will be paying taxes on what they earn."
Because the Senate failed to act, the estate tax will disappear in 2010, then return in 2011 to the pre-Bush levels with an exemption of $2 million for a couple and $1 million for an individual. However, it is unlikely that Congress will allow the estate tax to revert fully. In response, UFE and other estate tax advocates are supporting Rep. Jim McDermott's Sensible Estate Tax Act, HR 2023, as a middle ground between 2009 and pre-2001 law. It includes an exemption of $4 million for a married couple, with a 45% rate on amounts over that, and a 55% rate on estates worth over $10 million.
"The estate tax helps pay for essential services ranging from education to transportation that are the cornerstone of our nation's prosperity," states Miller. "Instead of giving tax breaks to the super-rich, many of the same people who wrecked our economy, we need a tax system that works for middle-class families. That's why it is so important that we preserve the estate tax, allowing each generation to get a fair shot at achieving the American Dream though their own merit. We urge Congress to reinstate this critical source of revenue for our nation and its people."

7 Comments so far
Show AllMathematics shows that as the economy becomes ever more globalized more and more of those who are currently rich will descend into poverty.
Support your neighborhood farmer.
Interesting comment from Parallax. That certainly seems not to have been the statistical fact in the United States. Can you reference data?
Going beyond this, and not intended as directly related, my reading suggests we have been in a fairly consistent curve since the 18th century. There have been a relatively few individuals becoming wealthier than any besides kings of the past. Yes, in the Western World, there has generally been an increasing abundance for most. However, political opportunities have often been greatly curtailed and have generally eroded. But, only recently has there been overlap of material advantages of capitalism to other populations. And, of course, there are great inequalities.
With all the factors of climate-change demands, we may easily be on the cusp of another great shift in technology and political power, and, thereby, distribution of quality of life and democratic life. We, of the progressive-left community tried before, several times, to redirect the increasing narrowing of power and wealth. Overall, we have failed.
Major reviews of our process and goals seem needed to both deal with the impending disaster of climate-change and the very possible hijacking of new technology and social order, by the old philosophies of centralized, corporate-capitalism and authoritarianism.
We should support our neighborhood farmers and our city populations. In both cases, existing power and capital are opposed.
become one local farming will become a very important part of the oncoming
petroleum shortages and many backyards will become farms in the next 10 15 yrs.
might as well start now and get the hang of it. and when the idle rich who
know very little because there was no need to ask us help them- help them
like they helped us tell them to go fuck themselves and die just like they
told us! no reason at all to be nice. it will be a case of survival of the
fittest and that won't be them! nature will favor the toughest!
Has that ever happened? I don't think so.
The rich will simply bid up the price of necessities and also hire desperate poor people to work for them at frozen or dropping wages.
Oh! Wait! Isn't that what has been happening thoughout our lifetimes?
When the rich can control all the levers of production, government and the media, they are not likely to surrender or even allow anything like real competition.
The system will change when it is forced to change. And, in fact, it has changed a great deal. Unfortunately, it has been changing for the worse.
Become a local 'gentleman' farmer with sharecroppers and serfs and all?
Yes the tax sould be re-instated at the pre-Clinton level. Income tax on the Wealthiest of us shoulod go back to pre REAGAN rates or better yet: Icke's rates: 91%
Remember this 91% is the marginal tax rate. It applied to the next dollar above $3 million/year (In todays dollars according to Thom Hartman).
This tax rate encourages rich people to make investments in the real economy (starting small businesses, buying small farms), giving to charities...
Corporations being "people" could pay their fair share then:
91% above $ 1million in profits...
I bet they'd want to let go of their person-hood!