Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: PFAW Drew Courtney or Josh Glasstetter |
The Numbers Don’t Lie--GOP Obstruction Efforts Unprecedented in Senate
A review of cloture attempts in past sessions of Congress reveals that Republican senators have gone to record lengths to use Senate rules with the goal of slowing down the work of Congress, often when they have no expectation of stopping legislation or even winning concessions.
So far, GOP foot dragging has forced the Senate leadership to file 67 cloture petitions and forced cloture votes on 38 occasions [1] . Those numbers, while high, aren’t yet on pace to break the record set by the GOP in the last Congress of 139 motions filed and 112 forced votes. But what is remarkable is that, of those 38 votes forced this year, cloture was invoked 34 times.
That means a full 89% of the time, the cloture vote did nothing but delay the inevitable—a huge increase from the previous high of 56%.

Moreover many of these votes didn’t just fail: they failed by such significant margins that no one, especially not an experienced vote counter like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, could possibly have expected they could actually pass. In fact, in a majority of cases, 65 or more Senators voted to cut off debate. In several cases the number reached into the seventies and eighties, and in one case 97 Senators voted in favor of cloture, but not before the maneuver chewed up valuable time.

Far from being a meaningless exercise, this effort to force unnecessary cloture votes has wasted an enormous amount of time. After cloture is filed it takes up to two days before Senate rules allow a vote on the petition. Then, Senate rules permit the Republicans to insist on an additional 30 hours of post-cloture debate. That means even when only a small minority of Senators actually oppose cloture, they have the ability to chew up days of the Senate’s time.
In 2010, the Senate will likely consider legislation addressing health care, global warming, the economy, immigration, and workers’ rights in addition to its obligation to confirm Supreme Court Justices, members of the federal bench and crucial administration officials. There’s plenty of work to be done, and time is already tight without needless intentional delay.
The Republican Senators should stop trying to grind the Senate to a halt and start working on the issues that Americans elected them to address.
###
Download this report in PDF format here.


7 Comments so far
Show AllMt. Rushmore Accomplishments not Blarney Blabber
Clintonomics vs Reaganomics
Comparing Democrat’s hero-CLINTON—versus Republican’s hero--REAGAN
1.JOBS—grew by 43% more under Clinton.
2.GDP---grew by 57% more under Clinton.
3.DOW—grew by 700% more under Clinton..
4.NASDAQ-grew by 18 times as much under Clinton.
5.SPENDING--grew by 28% under Clinton---80% under Reagan.
6.DEBT—grew by 43% under Clinton—187% under Reagan.
7. DEFICITS—Clinton got a large surplus--grew by 112% under Reagan.
8.NATIONAL INCOME—grew by100% more under Clinton.
9.PERSONAL INCOME—Grew by 110% more under Clinton.
SOURCES—Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.BLS.Gov )--Economic Policy Institute (EPI.org)—Global & World Almanacs from 1980 to 2003 (annual issues)
www.the-hamster.com (chart taken from NY Times)
National Archives History on Presidents. www.nara.gov
LA Times 10-11-00 on Market--www.Find articles.com
A vote for a Republican is a vote for Less Success.
A vote to reduce the Standard of Living for all Americans.
Rape of Middle Class
From USA to Wall Street Of America
too long for here
google: clarence swinney + rape of middle class
This is very important help distribute it
America is in trouble when 20% own 93% of Wealth.
cswinney2@triad.rr.com
Seems very odd that the GOP would impede Congress considering that the new admin is pretty much exactly like the old one.
Not denying it, just saying it's odd.
Could be that they are still trying to fool the people who haven't caught on yet.
Could be that they are trying to distract us while they do something far more evil behind closed doors.
Could be that the Dems need a good excuse for not getting anything good passed (as if they really wanted to).
Lots of reasons. Every one deceitful.
thsy will pay for their transgressions in nov 2010@!
the senate is an archaic, anti-democratic institution whose time has passed. always remember that 52% of the u.s. population lives in our 9 largest states, but those states have only 18% of the voting power in the u.s. senate. the senate committee who slowed healthcare reform were from maine, new mexico, iowa, montana, wyoming, and north dakota, which together compose less than 3% of the u.s. population. these obstructions are constitutionally inherent, inscribed by framers madison and hamilton, who continually warned about the dangers of democracy; that the other founders heeded these warnings is evident from the voting qualifications found in the original constitution, which disenfranchised the landless and the marginal landowners. thus, when our current u.s. senate superimposes an extra-constitutional device such as the "60 votes to break a filibuster" rule atop the already anti-majoritarian senatorial structure, it confirms that today's senators have made the framers' fears their own and themselves inhibited democratic legislative outcomes. how about letting us call a constitutional convention to update the ancient documents that inform and shape the way this twenty-first century country is run? oh, we can't do that, because the constitution requires the affirmative votes of three-fourth of our state legislatures to convoke such a convention. so, the 18% of the voters who live in one- quarter of our states can block the will of the other 82%, should the latter ever get the gumption to rewrite the constitution in an attempt to restructure this increasingly sclerotic thing that we call our federal government.