December, 02 2009, 01:27pm EDT
US: Remote Detainee Lockups Hinder Justice
Transfers of Detained Immigrants Interfere with Lawyer Access and Right to Challenge Deportation
WASHINGTON
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency's increasing practice
of transferring immigrants facing deportation to detention centers far
away from their homes severely curtails their ability to challenge
their deportation, Human Rights Watch says in a report released today.
The agency made 1.4 million detainee transfers in the decade from 1999
through 2008, the report says.
The 88-page report, "Locked Up Far Away: The Transfer of Immigrants to Remote Detention Centers in the United States,"
presents new data analyzed for Human Rights Watch by the Transactional
Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) of Syracuse University. The data
show that 53 percent of the 1.4 million transfers have taken place
since 2006, and most occur between state and local jails that contract
with the agency, known as ICE, to provide detention bed space. The
report's findings are based on the new data and interviews with
officials, immigration lawyers, detainees, and their family members.
"ICE is increasingly subjecting detainees to a chaotic game of
musical chairs," said Alison Parker, deputy US director for Human
Rights Watch and author of the report. "And it's a game with dire
consequences since it may keep them from finding an attorney or
presenting evidence in their defense."
Many immigrants are first arrested and detained in major cities like
Los Angeles or Philadelphia, places where immigrants have lived for
decades and where their family members, employers, and attorneys also
live. Days or months later, with no notice, many of these immigrants
are loaded onto planes for transport to detention centers in remote
corners of states such as Texas, California, and Louisiana (the three
states most likely to receive transfers), the report found.
The detained immigrants have the right, under both US and
international human rights law, to be represented in deportation
hearings by an attorney of their choice and to present evidence in
their defense. But once they are transferred, immigrants are often so
far away from their lawyers, evidence, and witnesses that their ability
to defend themselves in deportation proceedings is severely curtailed,
the report found.
"Immigrant detainees should not be treated like so many boxes of
goods - shipped to the most convenient place for ICE to store them,"
Parker said. "We are especially concerned that the transferred
detainees may find that their chances of successfully fighting
deportation or gaining asylum from persecution have just evaporated."
The federal Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (which covers
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) has jurisdiction over the largest
number of the transferred detainees. Those transfers are of particular
concern, Human Rights Watch said, because that court is widely known
for decisions that are hostile to non-citizens and because the states
within its jurisdiction collectively have the lowest ratio of
immigration attorneys to immigration detainees in the country.
Human Rights Watch acknowledged that some detainee transfers are
inevitable, but said that ICE and Congress should use reasonable and
rights-protective checks on detainee transfers as the best state
criminal justice systems do. The report recommends concrete steps to
help create such a system.
Although ICE has recently announced plans to revamp its detention
system, which may provide an opening for reforms, the agency previously
has rejected recommendations to place enforceable constraints on its
transfer power.
Human Rights Watch's report is being released on the same day (December 2) as the Constitution Project's
"Recommendations for Reforming our Immigration Detention System and
Promoting Access to Counsel in Immigration Proceedings," finding that
immigration detention is overused and immigrant detainees experience
problems in accessing counsel and providing recommendations for reform.
Also on December 2, the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse will
release detailed facility level data on detainee transfers.
***
Testimony from detainees, family members, and attorneys about transfers:
"The transfers are devastating, absolutely devastating. [Detainees]
are loaded onto a plane in the middle of the night. They have no idea
where they are, no idea what [US] state they are in. I cannot
overemphasize the psychological trauma to these people. What it does to
their family members cannot be fully captured either. I have taken
calls from seriously hysterical family members - incredibly traumatized
people - sobbing on the phone, crying out, 'I don't know where my son
or husband is!'" - Rebecca Schreve, immigration attorney, El Paso, Texas, January 29, 2009.
"In New York when I was detained, I was about to get an attorney
through one of the churches, but that went away once they sent me here
to New Mexico.... All my evidence and stuff that I need is right there
in New York. I've been trying to get all my case information from New
York ... writing to ICE to get my records. But they won't give me my
records; they haven't given me nothing. I'm just representing myself
with no evidence to present." - Kevin H. (pseudonym), Otero County Processing Center, Chaparral, New Mexico, February 11, 2009.
"I have never represented someone who has not been in more than
three detention facilities. Could be El Paso, Texas, a facility in
Arizona, or they send people to Hawaii .... I have been practicing
immigration law for more than a decade. Never once have I been notified
of [my client's] transfer. Never." - Holly Cooper, immigration
attorney and clinical professor of law, University of California Davis
School of Law, Davis, California, January 27, 2009.
"Ever since they sent him there [to New Mexico], it's been a
nightmare. My mother has blood pressure problems, and her pressure goes
up and down like crazy now because of worrying about him and stuff.
[His wife] has been terrified. She cries every night. And his baby asks
for him, asks for "Papa." He kisses his photo. He starts crying as soon
as he hears his father's voice on the phone even though he is only
one.... Last week [my brother] called to say he can't do it anymore.
He's going to sign the paper agreeing to his deportation." - Georgina V. (pseudonym), sister of detainee, Brooklyn, New York, January 23, 2008.
A detainee who was transferred 1,400 miles away to a detention
facility in Texas after a few weeks in a detention center in southern
California said that the difference for him was "like the difference
between heaven and earth. At least in California I had a better chance.
I could hire a[n] attorney to represent me. Now, here, I have no chance
other than what the grace of God gives me." - Michael M. (pseudonym), Pearsall Detention Center, Pearsall, Texas, April 25, 2008.
A legal permanent resident originally from the Dominican Republic,
who had been living in Philadelphia but was transferred to Texas said,
"I had to call to try to get the police records myself. It took a lot
of time. The judge got mad that I kept asking for more time. But
eventually they arrived. I tried to put on the case myself. I lost." - Miguel A. (pseudonym), Port Isabel Service Processing Center, Los Fresnos, Texas, April 23, 2008.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Russia's Putin Secures Another Term
The controversial leader won a record number of votes for a post-Soviet candidate even as opponents organized a protest at noon on the election's third and last day.
Mar 17, 2024
Despite protests on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin won reelection with more votes than any candidate since the fall of the Soviet Union.
Exit poll the Public Opinion Foundation (POF) put the final tally after three days of voting at 87.8%, the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) at 87%, and Russia's Central Election Commission (CEC) at 87.3%. Putin will now serve another six-year term, meaning he will have been at the helm of the Russian state for longer than any leader since Catherine the Great, surpassing Josef Stalin.
The election comes less than a month after the second anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and is likely to lead to more tensions between the Russian and U.S. governments.
"It gives me some hope to see how many people are not happy with the dictatorship, the war, with what's happening in Russia."
"For a U.S. administration that hoped Putin's Ukraine adventure would be wrapped up by now with a decisive setback to Moscow's interests, the election is a reminder that Putin expects that there will be many more rounds in the geopolitical boxing ring," Nikolas Gvosdev, director of the National Security Program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told the Russia Matters project.
With most of Putin's prominent opponents either dead, imprisoned, or in exile, the elections results were considered a foregone conclusion by both friends and foes of his administration.
A Putin spokesperson said in 2023 that the election was "not really democracy" but instead "costly bureaucracy," according to CNN. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council said the election was "obviously not free nor fair."
However, Russian opponents of Putin did find a way to demonstrate their position with a protest called "Noon Against Putin." The protest was called for by St. Petersburg politician Maxim Reznik, according to The Guardian. Participants were instructed to head to a polling place at noon and cast a paper ballot for one of the candidates running against Putin, or to write-in another candidate or spoil their ballot.
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny had endorsed the protest before his death last month in a Russian prison, leading the Independent Novaya Gazeta newspaper to dub it "Navalny's political testament."
The action drew crowds to polling places both in Russian cities like Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Yekaterinburg and at Russian embassies around the world.
"This is the first time in my life I have ever seen a queue for elections," one woman waiting in line in Moscow told
CNN. Russian journalists reported that the lines at some stations within the country reached the thousands, according to Reuters.
Navalny's widow, Yulia Navalnaya, who had also endorsed the protest, voted at the embassy in Berlin, while several protesters gathered outside the embassy in London.
"I expected there to be a lot of people, but not this many," London-based participant Maria Dorofeyeva told The Guardian, adding, "It gives me some hope to see how many people are not happy with the dictatorship, the war, with what's happening in Russia. And we want to stop it."
Ruslan Shaveddinov of Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation told Reuters:
"We showed ourselves, all of Russia and the whole world that Putin is not Russia (and) that Putin has seized power in Russia."
"Our victory is that we, the people, defeated fear, we defeated solitude—many people saw they were not alone," Shaveddinov said
Keep ReadingShow Less
Van Hollen Says Netanyahu Spreading 'Flat Out Lies' About UNRWA
The Maryland senator defended the organization on CBS and said there was no evidence that it was a "proxy for Hamas."
Mar 17, 2024
U.S. Senator for Maryland Chris Van Hollen continued his defense of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and its work in Gaza in an appearance on CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday.
"The claim that Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu and others are making that somehow UNRWA is a proxy for Hamas are just flat out lies, that's a flat out lie," he told journalist Margaret Brennan.
The U.S. was one of many Western countries that paused funding for UNRWA after the agency announced in January that it had fired 12 staffers over Israeli allegations that they had been involved in Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel. However, some countries including Canada, Sweden, the European Union, and Australia have since restored funding. A report has also emerged that Israel tortured UNRWA staffers into falsely confessing to involvement in the Hamas attack.
"Netanyahu has wanted to get rid of UNRWA because he had seen them as a means to continue the hopes of the Palestinian people for a homeland of their own."
Van Hollen's remarks on Sunday come days after he argued for the restoration of UNRWA funds on the floor of the U.S. Senate and criticized Republican legislators who wanted to permanently end funds for the organization that supports some 6 million Palestinian refugees in countries across the Middle East, including around 2 million in Gaza.
During his speech, he pointed out that the Netanyahu government had not shared the underlying evidence that UNRWA staffers participated in October 7 with either UNRWA itself or the U.S. government. He also urged his colleagues to read a classified Director of National Intelligence report on Netanyahu's claims of UNRWA complicity with Hamas.
On "Face the Nation," Van Hollen said that the person in charge of operations on the ground in UNRWA was a 20-year U.S. Army veteran.
"You can be sure he is not in cahoots with Hamas," the senator told Brennan.
He also repeated claims that Netanyahu has wanted to eliminate UNRWA entirely since at least 2017.
"Netanyahu has wanted to get rid of UNRWA because he had seen them as a means to continue the hopes of the Palestinian people for a homeland of their own," Van Hollen said, adding that the right-wing Israeli leader's "primary objective" was preventing the formation of a Palestinian state.
However, the dismantling of UNRWA would be especially catastrophic amid Israel's ongoing bombardment and invasion of Gaza, which has killed more than 31,000 people and put the survivors at risk of famine. No other organization has the infrastructure in place to distribute the necessary aid.
"If you cut off funding for UNRWA in Gaza entirely, it means more people will starve, more people won't get the medial assistance they need, and so it would be a huge mistake," Van Hollen said.
He also said that only 14 of the agency's 13,000-strong staff in Gaza had been accused of participating in the October 7 attack.
"We should investigate it, we should hold all those people accountable, but for goodness' sake, let's not hold 2 million innocent Palestinian civilians who are dying of starvation... accountable for the bad acts of 14 people."
Van Hollen also repeated his call for President Joe Biden to condition the sale of offensive military weapons to Israel on the country obeying international law and allowing aid into Gaza. While Israel sent the U.S. a letter saying it was in compliance with the law, "the day it was signed, clearly the Netanyahu government is not in compliance, because we see that they're continuing to restrict humanitarian assistance," he told Brennan.
Also on "Face the Nation" Sunday, United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Chief Executive Catherine Russell described the impact that a lack of aid was having on the children of Gaza.
"We know now that children are dying of malnutrition in Gaza," she told Brennan.
Russell said that not enough aid was reaching those who needed it, calling both air drops and sea deliveries "a drop in the bucket."
She also called for greater transparency into what was actually happening in Gaza and the difficulties of delivering aid.
"The world should be able to see what's happening and make their own judgments about what's going on," Russell said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Gore Calls Out Fossil Fuel Industry 'Shamelessness' in Lying to Public
"They are continuing to do similar things today to try to fool people and pull the wool over people's eyes just in the name of greed," the former vice president said.
Mar 17, 2024
In reflecting on nearly 50 years of climate advocacy, former Vice President Al Gore said that he had "underestimated" the greed of the fossil fuel industry.
The remarks came in an interview published in USA Today on Sunday. When asked if he had any regrets, Gore responded that he had "put every ounce of energy" he had into climate advocacy, but added:
"I was pretty slow to recognize how important the massive funding of anti-climate messaging was going on. I underestimated the power of greed in the fossil fuel industry, the shamelessness in putting out the lies."
"They are continuing to do similar things today to try to fool people and pull the wool over people's eyes just in the name of greed," Gore continued.
"What's at stake is so incredible."
Gore, who tried to raise awareness about the climate crisis in the U.S. House of Representatives as early as 1981 and brought the issue to national attention in 2006's documentary An Inconvenient Truth, has taken a harsher tone against oil, gas, and coal companies in recent months. In August 2023, he said that the "climate crisis is a fossil fuel crisis," and in September, he implored the industry to "get out of the way." In December, he lamented that the industry had "captured the COP process," referring to the appointment of the United Arab Emirates national oil company CEO Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber to preside over the United Nations' COP28 climate conference in that country.
In the USA Today interview, Gore also named the fossil fuel industry when asked about his greatest frustration.
"Well, that we haven't made more progress," Gore answered, "and that some of the fossil fuel companies have been shameless in providing, continuing to provide lavish funding for disinformation and misinformation."
"What's at stake is so incredible," he added.
However, Gore told USA Today that he tried not to focus on his anger, but instead on continuing to raise awareness about the crisis and what can be done about it. And he remained hopeful that his grandchildren would live in a world in which people had come together and acted in time.
"We've got all the solutions we need right now to cut emissions in half before the end of this decade," he said. "We've got a clear line of sight to how we can cut the other 50% of emissions by mid century."
He also encouraged more people to get involved with the climate movement.
"I would say the greatest need is for more grassroots advocates because the most persuasive advocates are those in your own community," he said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular