EMAIL SIGN UP!
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Ecuador to US: We Won't Be 'Blackmailed' over Snowden
- Corporate Education 'From Above' and the Trouble with Common Core
- “Believe It or Not!”13 Mindblowing Facts About America’s Tax-Dodging Corporations
- The Naked Empire
- Snowden Coverage: If US Mass Media Were State-Controlled, Would They Look Any Different?
Today's Top News
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Constitution Project Files Amicus Brief on First Amendment in U.S. Supreme Court
Brief follows the Project's recently released report Reforming the Material Support Laws: Constitutional Concerns Presented by Prohibitions on Material Support to "Terrorist Organizations"
WASHINGTON - November 23 - Today, the Constitution Project and The Rutherford Institute filed a friend of the court brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.
The case involves federal laws prohibiting "material support" of
terrorist groups and challenges the application of these laws to
organizations and individuals who seek to provide human rights training
to a designated group. The amicus brief argues that applying
the material support statutes to punish pure speech that seeks to
further lawful, non-violent ends is unconstitutionally overbroad. The
brief explains that the challenged provisions of the material support
laws conflict with First Amendment protections for free speech and
freedom of association, and should therefore be struck down by the
Earlier this month, the Constitution Project's Liberty and Security Committee released a
report, Reforming the Material Support Laws: Constitutional Concerns Presented by Prohibitions on Material Support to "Terrorist Organizations," that proposes eight reforms to remedy serious First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment concerns created by existing material support laws.
"The federal laws prohibiting assistance to terrorist organizations play an important role in our nation's efforts to combat terrorism, but we must also ensure that these laws are not applied in a way that infringes upon Americans' First Amendment rights of free speech and freedom of association," said Sharon Bradford Franklin, senior counsel for the Constitution Project. "This case provides an opportunity for the Supreme Court to rein in the unconstitutional use of the material support statutes to prohibit protected First Amendment activities. Our brief urges the Court to strike down the challenged provisions of the law, to ensure that terrorist activities are prohibited, but free speech and association are still safeguarded by the First Amendment."
To view a copy of the amicus brief filed in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, go to:
To view the Constitution Project's report, Reforming the Material Support Laws, go to: