November, 18 2009, 11:16am EDT
Cuba: Raul Castro Imprisons Critics, Crushes Dissent
Obama Should Replace Failed Embargo With Effective Multilateral Policy
WASHINGTON
Raul Castro's government has locked up scores of people for
exercising their fundamental freedoms and allowed scores more political
prisoners arrested during Fidel Castro's rule to languish in detention,
Human Rights Watch says in a report released today. Rather than dismantle Cuba's repressive machinery, Raul Castro has kept it firmly in place and fully active, the report says.
The 123-page report, "New Castro, Same Cuba,"
shows how the Raul Castro government has relied in particular on the
Criminal Code offense of "dangerousness," which allows authorities to
imprison individuals before they have committed any crime, on the
suspicion that they are likely to commit an offense in the future. This
"dangerousness" provision is overtly political, defining as "dangerous"
any behavior that contradicts Cuba's socialist norms.
"In his three years in power, Raul Castro has been just as brutal as
his brother," said Jose Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human
Rights Watch. "Cubans who dare to criticize the government live in
perpetual fear, knowing they could wind up in prison for merely
expressing their views."
Based on a fact-finding mission to Cuba and more than 60 in-depth
interviews, Human Rights Watch documented more than 40 cases in which
the government has imprisoned individuals under the "dangerousness"
provision for exercising their basic rights.
Ramon Velasquez Toranzo, who set out on a peaceful march across Cuba
to call for respect for human rights and freedom for all political
prisoners, was arrested and sentenced to three years in prison for
"dangerousness" in January 2007.
Raymundo Perdigon Brito, a journalist who wrote articles documenting
abuses by the government and published them on foreign websites, was
sentenced to four years in prison for "dangerousness" in December 2006.
He has endured repeated beatings by guards and solitary confinement
during his incarceration.
The Raul Castro government also uses a range of other draconian laws
to silence free speech, quash labor rights, and criminalize all forms
of dissent. Human rights defenders, journalists, and other civil
society members tried under these laws are subjected to systematic due
process violations, including abusive interrogations, the denial of
legal counsel, and sham trials.
Alexander Santos Hernandez, a political activist who was sentenced
to four years for "dangerousness" in 2006, told Human Rights Watch,
"[The police] picked me up at 5:50 a.m. while I was at home sleeping,
and by 8:30 that morning they were already reading me my sentence."
Santos was denied a lawyer, and the sentence he was given was dated two
days before his trial took place.
Political prisoners are subjected to widespread abuses, including
forced ideological re-education, extended solitary confinement, and the
denial of medical treatment for serious illnesses.
In addition to imprisoning dissenters, Raul Castro's government also
enforces political conformity using beatings, short-term detention,
public acts of repudiation, and the denial of work, among other
tactics. Taken together, these everyday forms of repression create a
climate of fear that has a profound chilling effect on the exercise of
fundamental freedoms in Cuban society.
As a human rights defender, Rodolfo Bartelemi Coba, told Human
Rights Watch in March 2009, "We live 24 hours a day ready to be
detained." Ten days after making that statement, Bartelemi was arrested
and taken to prison, where he remains.
Efforts by the US government to press for change by imposing a
sweeping embargo have proven to be a costly and misguided failure,
Human Rights Watch said. The embargo has inflicted severe hardship on
the Cuban population as a whole, while doing nothing to improve the
human rights situation in Cuba. Rather than isolating Cuba, the policy
has isolated the United States, alienating Washington's potential
allies on this issue.
"Despite new leadership in Havana and Washington, Cuba continues to
crush dissent, while the US pursues the same failed embargo policy,"
said Vivanco. "As always, it is the Cuban people who are paying the
price."
"New Castro, Same Cuba" recommends that the Obama administration
secure commitments from the European Union, Canada, and Latin American
allies to unite to press Cuba to meet a single, concrete demand: the
immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners within
six months.
Those include the 53 prisoners who have been languishing in prison
since a 2003 crackdown by Fidel Castro, as well as all scores of
individuals incarcerated for "dangerousness" under Raul Castro.
Once this joint commitment is in place, the US government should end its failed embargo policy, Human Rights Watch said.
If the Raul Castro government does not meet this demand, members of
the multilateral coalition should impose targeted, punitive measures,
such as travel bans on government officials or withholding new forms of
foreign investment. These measures should be significant enough to bear
real consequences for the Cuban government, while being careful not to
impose suffering on the Cuban population as a whole, Human Rights Watch
said.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and Brasília's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular