October, 15 2009, 03:52pm EDT
Diverse Coalition Re-Launches Multi-Million Dollar Education Campaign for the Freedom to Marry
Let California Ring is the country’s largest marriage education effort of its kind
LOS ANGELES
Today a
broad-based coalition re-launched Let California Ring, a comprehensive
campaign to build support for marriage for California's same-sex
couples with a focus on work in communities of color. A joint effort of
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender organizations, funders, and
allied partners and hosted by the Equality California Institute, Let
California Ring will invest more than $15 million over the next three
years to fund the campaign, which will:
- Develop
tailored messaging for all audiences, with a focus on African-American,
Asian Pacific Islander, and Latino Californians. - Deliver
these messages through a multi-media campaign, including television,
print and radio advertising, as well as online outreach. - Provide
opportunities, tools and resources for the 18,000 legally married
same-sex couples to share their experiences with audiences throughout
the state. - Activate straight allies and students to get involved and take action.
- Engage
the faith community at every level, to ensure that supportive voices of
faith are given a platform and to bring mainstream and progressive
congregations into the educational and organizing work.
Equality
California Institute's 20 organizers, working out of nine field offices
throughout California, significantly increase the capacity and reach of
the Let California Ring campaign.
"The
Let California Ring campaign will enable hundreds of thousands of
Californians to learn first-hand why marriage matters so much to
same-sex couples," said Equality California Marriage Director Marc
Solomon. "By combining strategic media campaigns with personal
conversations at people's doors, we will make a powerful appeal to
Californians that will change hearts and minds. We are committed to
building meaningful and lasting partnerships in communities of color.
In a state where people of color are in the majority, focusing on this
work could not be more important," Solomon added.
Let
California Ring will place special focus on partnerships with LGBT
organizations that do educational work in communities of color.
"A
few months ago many of us said, 'let's prepare to prevail,'" said Luis
Lopez, the founder of the Latino-focused political committee HONOR PAC
and a member of the Executive Committee of Let California Ring. "That's
exactly what Let California Ring will do. This campaign will engage the
right partnerships to do the heavy lifting of reaching out to people of
color communities in ways that truly resonate. The time for this
campaign couldn't be better," he added.
The
model Let California Ring employs is to use multiple channels to engage
people on the issue of marriage: targeted advertising, online media,
community events, leader activation and on-the-ground organizing
efforts in neighborhoods. This continual drumbeat sparks conversations
and gets people to talk to others in their circles about marriage for
same-sex couples.
"Let
California Ring's model of concerted action is the surest and fastest
way to win the freedom to marry," said Evan Wolfson, executive director
of Freedom to Marry. "By combining the air-cover of media with the
ground-work of engaging in the needed conversations - person-to-person,
group-to-group - the menu of actions spurred by Let California Ring
will persuade the persuadable and help everyone we reach together rise
to fairness. The success of Let California Ring will not only advance
our cause in California, but also help write the recipe for success
nationwide."
Established
in 2005, Let California Ring has invested $15 million in marriage
education work to date, including $4 million in communities of color,
making Let California Ring the largest campaign in the country of its
kind. Let California Ring has conducted public education efforts
through television, radio and print ads, including implementing the
state's largest ever ethnic press campaign on the issue of marriage.
The campaign also held community meetings, public forums, and trainings
across the state and has provided resources to LGBT organizations
working in communities of color. The Let California Ring coalition
currently numbers over 50 organizations.
In
February 2008, Let California Ring conducted a six-week targeted
campaign in Santa Barbara with field, media and advertising components.
Public opinion testing showed a 19-point increase in support for the
freedom to marry in 18-29 year olds at the campaign's conclusion, with
no similar increases in neighboring communities. It also built a cadre
of engaged activists who carried the work forward after the educational
campaign concluded. Prop. 8 lost by 10 points in Santa Barbara County,
the only Southern California county to vote that way.
Let
California Ring also won two awards: the Saber Award for best public
relations campaign in the United States and the Gold Award from Council
on Foundations for best public policy campaign.
For more information or to join the coalition, visit www.letcaliforniaring.org.
Let
California Ring is a public education campaign to open hearts and minds
about the freedom to marry and the respect, support, protections and
responsibilities that come with marriage. Let California Ring is a
project of Equality California Institute, working in a diverse
coalition of over 50 national, state and local organizations.
Equality California is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, grassroots-based, statewide advocacy organization whose mission is to achieve equality and civil rights for all lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Californians.
LATEST NEWS
'Collapse of Political Ambition': EU Shelves Nature Restoration Law
"To let this go now means we go into European elections saying the European system is not working, we do not protect nature, we do not take climate seriously," said Ireland's environmental minister. "That would be an absolute shame."
Mar 26, 2024
Environmental ministers in the European Union on Monday warned that the bloc's credibility on heading off the global biodiversity and climate emergencies is in peril following the European Council's decision to remove the historic Nature Restoration Law from its agenda after the proposal lost key support.
"We inspired others, yet now we risk arriving empty handed at COP16 [the 2024 UN Biodiversity Conference]," Virginijus Sinkevičius, E.U. commissioner for environment, oceans, and fisheries, said in a statement. "Backtracking now is... very difficult for me to accept."
The law, first introduced in 2022 and approved by European Parliament last month, faced one final hurdle to passage with the planned Council vote, but recent protests by farmers over the new nature restoration requirements helped push some previous supporters to reverse their positions on Monday.
The Nature Restoration Law, which supporters said they still intend to try to pass before E.U. elections in June, would require member states to adopt measures to restore at least 30% of habitats by 2030, working up to 90% by 2050. Member states would be required to take action to reverse pollinator populations, restore organic soils in agricultural use, increase development of urban green areas, and take other steps to protect biodiversity.
Since the farmer protests began in France and started spreading to other countries including Spain, Belgium, and Italy, policymakers have offered concessions including delayed implementation of another set of biodiversity rules calling for the agriculture industry to keep 4% of farming land free of crop production to regenerate healthy soil. The European Commission also shelved an anti-pesticide law in February in response to the protests.
As countries announced their new opposition to the Nature Restoration Law in recent days, some ministers suggested the demonstrations contributed to their decision.
Anikó Raisz, Hungary's minister of state for environmental affairs, said the law would "overburden the economy" and cited concerns about the "sensitive situation" in the agriculture sector. Italy also said it was concerned about the biodiversity rules' impact on farmers.
The World Wide Fund For Nature (WWF) accused far-right Hungarian President Viktor Orbán, who has dismissed European climate policies, of being behind the "unexpected and clearly politically motivated change in Hungary's position."
Hungary's opposition "was left unchallenged by Sweden, Poland, Finland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, and Italy—who continue to either abstain or oppose," and "has now put the [Nature Restoration Law] in jeopardy again, giving Hungary's President Viktor Orbán the green light to further his own agenda and hold E.U. decision-making hostage," said WWF.
Eamon Ryan, Irish minister for the environment, accused other policymakers in the bloc of "buckling" before the farmer protests, which continued Tuesday, ahead of June elections.
"The biggest risk is the collapse of political ambition and will," Ryan said. "To let this go now means we go into European elections saying the European system is not working, we do not protect nature, we do not take climate seriously. That would be an absolute shame."
BirdLife Europe called on the E.U. the continue its efforts to pass the Nature Restoration Law before the session ends this summer.
"The E.U.'s reputation hangs in the balance in this critical year of E.U. elections," said the group. "Failure to make the law a reality also undermines the E.U.'s credibility and leadership on its international commitments to tackle the biodiversity and climate crises."
"This is definitely not the end of the story," Alain Maron, Belgium's minister for climate change, environment, energy, and participative democracy, told reporters at a press conference Monday. He added that the Belgian presidency of the European Council "will work hard in the next few weeks to find possible ways out of this deadlock, and get the file back on the agenda for adoption in another council."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Under Fire for Downplaying Security Council Resolution as 'Nonbinding'
One expert accused the U.S. of working to "undermine and sabotage the U.N. Security Council, the 'rules-based order,' and international law."
Mar 26, 2024
Biden administration officials attempted Monday to downplay the significance of a newly passed United Nations Security Council resolution, drawing ire from human rights advocates who said the U.S. is undercutting international law and stonewalling attempts to bring Israel's devastating military assault on Gaza to an end.
The resolution "demands an immediate cease-fire for the month of Ramadan respected by all parties, leading to a lasting sustainable cease-fire." The U.S., which previously vetoed several cease-fire resolutions, opted to abstain on Monday, allowing the measure to pass.
Shortly after the resolution's approval, several administration officials—including State Department spokesman Matthew Miller, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield—falsely characterized the measure as "nonbinding."
"It's a nonbinding resolution," Kirby told reporters. "So, there's no impact at all on Israel and Israel's ability to continue to go after Hamas."
Watch Matt Lee ask StateSpox about the passing of the UN ceasefire resolution. Basically the US position is it makes no difference and Miller calls 🇷🇺/🇨🇳 veto cynical.
Lee: Do you expect Israel is going to announce a ceasefire?
Miller: I do not
Lee: What’s the point of the UN? pic.twitter.com/FibaSKWjuh
— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) March 25, 2024
Josh Ruebner, an adjunct lecturer at Georgetown University and former policy director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, wrote in response that "there is no such thing as a 'nonbinding' Security Council resolution."
"Israel's failure to abide by this resolution must open the door to the immediate imposition of Chapter VII sanctions," Ruebner wrote.
Beatrice Fihn, the director of Lex International and former executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, condemned what she called the Biden administration's "appalling behavior" in the wake of the resolution's passage. Fihn said the administration's downplaying of the resolution shows how the U.S. works to "openly undermine and sabotage the U.N. Security Council, the 'rules-based order,' and international law."
In a Monday op-ed for Common Dreams, Phyllis Bennis, a senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, warned that administration officials' claim that the resolution was "nonbinding" should be seen as "setting the stage for the U.S. government to violate the U.N. Charter by refusing to be bound by the resolution's terms."
While all U.N. Security Council resolutions are legally binding, they're difficult to enforce and regularly ignored by the Israeli government, which responded with outrage to the latest resolution and canceled an Israeli delegation's planned visit to the U.S.
Israel Katz, Israel's foreign minister,
wrote on social media Monday that "Israel will not cease fire."
The resolution passed amid growing global alarm over the humanitarian crisis that Israel has inflicted on the Gaza Strip, where most of the population of around 2.2 million is displaced and at increasingly dire risk of starvation.
Amnesty International secretary-general Agnes Callamard said Monday that it was "just plain irresponsible" of U.S. officials to "suggest that a resolution meant to save lives and address massive devastation and suffering can be disregarded."
In addition to demanding an immediate cease-fire, the Security Council resolution calls for the unconditional release of all remaining hostages and "emphasizes the urgent need to expand the flow of humanitarian assistance."
Israel has systematically obstructed aid deliveries to Gaza, including
U.S.-funded flour shipments.
Farhan Haq, deputy spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, stressed during a briefing Monday that "all the resolutions of the Security Council are international law."
"They are as binding as international laws," Haq said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
State of Emergency Declared After Cargo Ship Destroys Baltimore Bridge
Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin said he was "deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore."
Mar 26, 2024
A state of emergency was declared in Maryland early Tuesday morning after a large cargo ship slammed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, leading to its total collapse and sending a number of vehicles and people into the Patapsco River.
As the Baltimore Sunreports:
In a Tuesday morning news conference, just a few hours after the incident, Baltimore Fire Department Chief James Wallace said authorities are "still very much in an active search and rescue posture" noting they are searching for "upwards of seven individuals" and that sonar has detected the presence of vehicles in the water. There is no indication that the event was intentional, Wallace said.
"This is a tragedy that you could never imagine … It looked like something out of an action movie," Mayor Brandon Scott said.
In a later press conference, officials said that two members of a construction crew that was on the bridge at the time of the collision had been rescued while six others remained unaccounted for.
The terrifying footage of the bridge's collapse—which CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez commented was "almost unbelievable" to watch—is circulating widely on news channels and social media:
This video is almost unbelievable. The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore literally collapsed this morning after it was struck by this large ship. pic.twitter.com/rYuy4U2r7H
— Omar Jimenez (@OmarJimenez) March 26, 2024
U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Tuesday that he had spoken with Mayor Scott and well as Maryland Governor Wes Moore and was helping to coordinate federal assistance.
"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," said Buttigieg.
Moore said in a statement he had declared a state of emergency and that work was underway to "quickly deploy federal resources" to the area.
"We are thankful for the brave men and women who are carrying out efforts to rescue those involved and pray for everyone's safety," said Moore. "We will remain in close contact with federal, state, and local entities that are carrying out rescue efforts as we continue to assess and respond to this tragedy."
Early reporting indicated that no crew members aboard the container ship, which sails under a Singapore flag, were injured or missing. A local harbor pilot was also said to be on board at the time of the crash.
"Deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) following the accident. "I'm profoundly thankful to first responders on the scene and will track rescue efforts by local, state, and federal authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular