Get News & Views Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Bob Woodward Embodies US Political Culture in a Single Outburst
- State Dept. Releases Keystone XL Environmental Impact Statement
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Americas Voice Paco Fabián, (202) 412-9969 |
CNN: More Like Fox Every Day
Latino in America a Charade without Mention of Dobbs
WASHINGTON - October 9 - The following is a statement by Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America's Voice, about the upcoming CNN series "Latino in America," scheduled to begin airing on October 22nd.
Last night, some of my colleagues at America's Voice went to the Washington premier of CNN's upcoming special, Latino in America. We've been waiting to see how this highly publicized series would handle one of the biggest menaces facing Latinos in America: CNN's Lou Dobbs.
But, last night we
heard from CNN executive Mark Nelson that the series doesn't mention
the role of the media in general nor the role of his network in
particular in propagating myths about Latinos. Reportedly, he went on
to suggest that the way to change views about Latinos was to have more
Eva Longorias.
CNN must know that
Dobbs is considered a major force in making life difficult for the
Latino community. Just two weeks ago, Democracia Ahora released survey
titled, "Latino Leaders and Their Opinions of CNN's Lou Dobbs." The report finds that an astounding 90% of Latino Leaders believe Dobbs makes it harder to be Latino in America.
America's Voice, along with Media Matters, NDN, and Presente.org,
has called on CNN to drop Dobbs from its lineup. The case against him
is compelling. My colleague, Adam Luna, wrote about Dobbs' extreme
anti-immigrant background at Huffington Post:
Few individuals have done more to bring extremism and race-based hate speech into the mainstream than Lou Dobbs. The network that purports to be "the most trusted name in news" broadcasts his vitriol every weekday during primetime - sandwiched between Anderson Cooper, John King, Wolf Blitzer and Dana Bash.
Watch just a couple of episodes and you'll see how he throws around the term "criminal illegal aliens" with the spite and frequency of a mid-century Southern politician using the N-word. In Dobbs' world, immigrants are disease ridden criminals who kill cops and are plotting for revolution. Bogus claims that immigrants are bringing a new wave of leprosy to America might be taken with a grain of salt on Fox - but on CNN, it's news.
When it comes to the controversial issue of immigration reform, Dobbs is no ordinary commentator. Check out this key finding from a study conducted by the Project for Excellence in Journalism at the Pew Research Center, "News Coverage of Immigration 2007," which can be found here:
The news agenda on cable to some extent depends not only on the channel but also on the host of the program. Among all the cable talkers, the one who was most clearly devoted to the cause of immigration was CNN's Lou Dobbs. While throughout the whole year immigration was the number one story at 22%, during [the Senate immigration debate] it skyrocketed to 43.1% of the time studied on Dobbs. Besides offering a timeline of the immigration bill debates within the Senate, Dobbs openly criticized the bill as an amnesty bill for illegal aliens in the country, pointed out how the bill would cost taxpayers a lot of money, and emphasized the need for better border security, which according to him was not a part of the proposed bill. He also was critical of George Bush, Ted Kennedy, Michael Chertoff, Lindsay Graham, Trent Lott and their stance on immigration. The night the immigration bill failed, Dobbs began his program with these words: "Tonight the crushing defeat for President Bush and the Senate's Democratic leadership on amnesty, a glorious victory for the American people."
"A glorious victory" for Dobbs was a crushing defeat for many Latino families - especially since in the aftermath of the bill's demise, the Bush Administration - in a naked effort to pander to the nativists Dobbs stirs up on a daily basis - ramped up enforcement so much that most mixed-status families now live in daily fear of being stopped, questioned, detained, and permanently separated.
So, given the outsized role Dobbs has played in demonizing Latino immigrants as criminals and disease carriers and defeating reform that would benefit millions of Latinos in America, one would expect that a series hosted by Soledad O'Brien, a professional journalist with a reputation for fairness and integrity, would at least reference the nation's chief immigrant-basher, no?
No. Was it intentional? Was O'Brien ordered to avoid this contentious intra-CNN issue? Is comity around the corridors of CNN more important than journalistic courage?
Truth is, when it comes to Latinos in America, Lou Dobbs is the elephant in the room. If the "Latino in America" series is to be considered credible, doesn't the series have to deal with that fact? Moreover, isn't it time for the serious journalists at CNN to stand up for the network's brand and their own reputations? Isn't it time for journalists to stand up to executives who sully the reputation of this once-great news network every time they put Lou Dobbs on the air?
Well, there's still time. But is there hope? We'll see when the series begins to air on October 22nd.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



4 Comments so far
Show AllIrrespective of the case against Dobbs, CNN will probably NOT change it's lineup so long as he's getting viewers. The fact that the Latino community is complaining is proof positive that they're watching him.
Ever since FOX won it's lawsuit in 2003 by arguing that it is "technically not against any law, rule or regulation to deliberately distort the news on television" (*), all "news" outlets have had a free hand to turn information into entertainment, or vice versa. Like it or not, FOX is making money, and CNN is just trying to do the same. What I believe is needed is a law which mandates that news be truthful and 'editorial' information be labled as such (IMHO)
(*) - from sourcewatch.org, article titled "Monsanto and Fox: Partners in Censorship"
The author of this articles evidently believes the opinion of invaders should be considered by a nation's beseiged inhabitants. This startling new thought is destined to the scrapheap of subjective journalism. One wonders which unscrupulous employer pays this writer.
Illegal immigrants are incontrovertably and precisely that... people who do not respect a nation's national integrity, economy, rights, incomes, and public services; and cross borders to devour these without matching contribution.
I support Gilchrist and the Minutemen, and the vast majority of Americans who want these parasites out.
The argument that Latinos only do the work that Americans don't want is nonsense. The real world description is that Latinos do the work that is so badly paid that no American would be fool enough to do it. The employers want cheap labor; period.
Sadly, tariff removal has meant that millions of jobs have been lost and jobs formerly eschewed are now sought in desperation; but these are taken by Latinos, who squeeze Americans out, violently if necessary.
Moreover, La Raza has an agenda of killing every black and white American and colonising the south-west. Whilst this might sound fair in a long term historical context, the whole world is the product of population movements of invaders and refugees and this is a clock that simply cannot be turned back.
For health, employment and public service sustainability reasons all illegal migrants must be moved back to their places of origin. The alternative is civil war.
This is not just the case in the United States; similar situations exist in most western nations, including Australia.
Hey monkey, It's only "civil war" when your losing.
And the "security industry" is winning?
"Moreover, La Raza has an agenda of killing every black and white American and colonising the south-west. "
Jeez dude, lay off the crystal meth.