EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Human Rights First Holly Shulman 202-674-8757, holly@rabinowitz-dorf.com |
Human Rights First Praises Final Passage of Hate Crimes Prevention Legislation
Says victory is an opportunity to renew U.S. influence abroad
WASHINGTON - October 8 - Praising House passage of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, legislation that was included in the Department of Defense authorization bill, Human Rights First noted the victory sets the stage for renewed U.S. influence to combat hate crimes abroad. The bill is expected to gain Senate approval next week.
"Today's victory is an important step forward in strengthening the U.S. government's response to these vicious and violent acts," stated Tad Stahnke, Human Rights First's Director of Policy and Programs. "This measure fills critical gaps in the response to this problem at home, while also sending an important message to foreign governments who struggle with similar problems in their countries. It demonstrates that U.S. lawmakers are committed to tackling these problems at home and will enable the U.S. to more effectively encourage other governments to strengthen their responses to hate crimes."
The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act strengthens existing laws by giving the Department of Justice (DOJ) the power in certain cases to investigate and prosecute bias-motivated violence by providing the DOJ with jurisdiction over crimes of violence where the perpetrator has selected the victim because of the person's actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. It also makes grants available to state and local communities to train law enforcement officers or assist in state and local investigations and prosecutions of bias-motivated crimes. The measure has been endorsed by 26 state Attorneys General, a number of the nation's most important law enforcement organizations, more than 275 national civil rights, professional, civic, education, and religious groups. President Obama has also indicated his support for these much-needed reforms.
Human Rights First noted that, in 2007, the Federal Bureau of Investigations documented 7,624 U.S. hate crimes directed against institutions and individuals because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, or disability. According to HRF's 2008 Hate Crimes Survey, similar violent hate crimes are on the rise across Europe and the former Soviet Union, a region where the majority of governments are failing to adequately address the problem. The United States has led efforts to confront this scourge through its foreign policy and engagement in multilateral institutions such as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. While an increasing number of European states are adopting hate crime legislation, there are few signs that it is consistently applied and only 13 of the 56 states reviewed by Human Rights First have legislation that extends to bias based on sexual orientation. The adoption and enforcement of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act and implementation of a series of other key reforms would carry significant weight as the United States seeks to encourage foreign leaders to toughen their own hate crimes response.
We call on the government of the United States to demonstrate continued international leadership in multilateral organizations, advocate measures to combat hate crime in bilateral relationships, and expand efforts to support civil society organizations, by taking the following steps:
- Raising violent hate crime issues with representatives of foreign governments and encouraging, where appropriate, legal and other policy responses, including those contained in Human Rights First's ten-point plan for governments to combat violent hate crime.
- Offer appropriate technical assistance and other forms of cooperation, including training of police and prosecutors in investigating, recording, reporting and prosecuting violent hate crimes as well as translation of Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) materials on hate crimes.
- Ensuring that groups working to combat all forms of violent hate crime have access to support under existing U.S. funding programs, including the Human Rights and Democracy Fund and programs for human rights defenders.
- Take the lead in the adoption of Ministerial Council of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) decision in December 2009 that reaffirms the commitment of member states to combat all hate crimes, including those motivated by sexual orientation and gender identity bias.
- Provide for extrabudgetary contributions, secondment of personnel, and other in-kind support for OSCE programs to combat violent hate crimes through reporting on states' responses as well as programs to train law enforcement officials and civil society organizations.
- Maintain strong and inclusive State Department monitoring and public reporting on racist, antisemitic, xenophobic, anti-Muslim, homophobic, anti-Roma and other bias-motivated violence-including by consulting with civil society groups as well as providing appropriate training for human rights officers and other relevant mission staff abroad.
For more information about Human Rights First's work to combat hate crimes in the U.S. and abroad, visit http://www.humanrightsfirst.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

2 Comments so far
Show AllAt what point do we have more folks "preventing" hate crimes than we have criminals being prosecuted for them. My guess is that we passed that number long ago.
This seems like an obvious question, but how do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt, absent an open confession, that "the perpetrator has selected the victim because of the person's actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability"?
Also, isn't one of the human rights a right to hold beliefs of one's own choosing? Doesn't punishing a person for having those beliefs (the actual violence is punished under the usual criminal codes) violate their rights?
A criminal who acts without even the least excuse of revenge or money should be punished. Then again, how can one person, or twelve, look into another's soul?
Did you know that Pew Charitable Trusts is throwing millions upon millions of dollars to make a new Museum in Central Philly that has a picture called "WOMAN" by Chaim Soutine in gallery 5 which shows a Male cross-dresser (with make-up on but without a wig) enveloped in flames with a flaming scimitar in the background. The Museum is called The Barnes Museum and while the museum may be important, PEW should not be spending their Non-Profit qualified Money and the $100 plus Million in PA State Tax dollars that they are spending to glorify this painting called WOMAN. They are actually claiming that they want this art to be more accessible to children. They are really out on a ledge on this one. I believe that the Barnes should be Preserved in the quiet corner of Merion where it is for historical preservation sake, because at least the people who view this painting in that out of the way place are usually of the more serious mindset that will not be improperly swayed by the anti-homosexual image. This WOMAN painting is definitely not for the eyes of young children. KEEP THE BARNES IN MERION. (See Barnesfriends.org) Voices from TIME, The WSJ, THE NEW YORKER, THE LA TIMES, THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL & even a curator of The Smithsonian have all condemned The Barnes Move but a bunch of high powered rich people are steamrolling it through. It is a National Cultural Disaster of Epic Proportions. Pew is leading the way. Please check it out.