September, 21 2009, 10:30am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Alexis Baden-Mayer 202-744-0853, alexis@organicconsumers.org -
Ronnie Cummins 218-349-3836 ronnie@organicconsumers.org
This Holiday Season: Boycott of 'Organic Cheater' Brands - 'Buycott' of Certified Natural & Organic Personal Care
Leading Consumer Watch Dog Group Gives Organic Cheater Brands One Month to Commit to Stop Deceptive Branding
BOSTON
On
September 24, 2009 at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center,
thousands of personal care products that claim to be "natural" and
"organic" will be on display as retail store buyers from across
the globe attend one of the most important natural products' trade
shows of the
year. This gathering will also mark the launch date of a new phase of
the Coming
Clean Campaign, led by the nation's largest organic consumer group, the
Organic
Consumers Association (OCA), in support of the recommendation by
the Certification, Accreditation, and Compliance Committee of the USDA
National
Organic Standards Board, "Solving the Problem of Mislabeled Organic
Personal Care Products." (To view
the recommendation, see OCA link at bottom of release.) The
recommendation
urges the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) to regulate personal care
products as they do food in order to clean up rampant organic fraud in
the
personal care marketplace. The full NOSB Board will be considering and
voting
on this recommendation at its Nov. 3-5 meeting in Washington D.C.
To encourage USDA NOP enforcement of organic personal care, the OCA
will launch a
full scale consumer boycott of all brands falsely labeled as Organic
who do not
contractually commit by October 26, 2009 to certification
of their natural and organic claims by October 31, 2009. Unlike organic
foods, many personal care products are falsely labeled as
organic, although their main cleansing and moisturizing ingredients are
made
from non-organic
pesticide-intensive agricultural and/or petrochemical material. The OCA
will also conduct a full-scale 'buy-cott' of all responsible brands
that already are certifying their natural and organic label claims.
"The organic retail store buyer's job is to think
like a fastidious organic consumer who pays a premium for organic
products
whose main ingredients benefit the earth and their health, by being
grown
without synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, and being free of
petrochemical
compounds," says Alexis Baden-Mayer, Political Director of the OCA.
"The
OCA wants these buyers to know misleadingly labeled brands are on their
way out
starting this holiday season, unless they formulate away from
ingredients made
entirely or partly of petrochemicals."
"One would think synthetic petroleum products would not
be accepted in the organic marketplace, but sadly they are everywhere," says
Baden-Mayer. "We will name the offending brands to boycott as well as the
responsible brands that people should buy. We are giving companies one last
opportunity to commit to clean up and certify their formulations and/or branding
labeling to comply with basic natural
and organic criteria," adds Baden-Mayer whose group
previously exposed 'natural' and 'organic' brands that contained the probable carcinogen 1,4 dioxane.
Starting
September 24, 2009 until October 2631, 2009 the OCA will
give all organic cheater brands the opportunity
to contractually commit to certification of their natural and organic claims in one
year's time, by November 1, 2010 to the following standards, or drop those claims including
the term "Organics" in branding. (The full contract is available through
the link to OCA's Coming Clean page at the bottom of this release.)
1) For "outright 'Organic" and "made with
Organic [specified ingredients]"' product claims (eg.
"Organic Lotion" or "Lotion made with Organic Oils")
products must be certified under the USDA National Organic ProgramOP 'Organic'.(See https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/NOP)
2) For a more restricted "made with Organic [specified
ingredients]" claim (eg. "Lotion made with Organic Aloe Vera"), or"Contains Organic
Ingredients" claim, products must certify to either:
preferably one, the USDA NOP O70 "made with Organic" or under the "NSF-ANSI
305 " "Contains Organic
Ingredients" standard. (See https://www.nsf.org/consumer/newsroom/fact_gl_personalcare.aspd; or two,
to another private standard of their choice such as NaTrueor BDIH, but
must nonetheless comply fully with NSF-ANSI 305 criteria for organic content
and allowed and disallowed processing of ingredients..)
3) For 'Natural' product claims, eg. "Natural
Lotion", products must be certified to one, preferably the Natural
Product's Association Natural Standard
Products certified under other foreign private
standards must cross-certify to the relevant US standard
and abide by the organic content requirement, processing
and preservative allowances, and
labeling restrictions, thereof. ; or two, to another natural
standard such as NaTrue or BDIH but which must nonetheless meet all criteria of
the NPA standard and not contain NPA disallowed ingredients which other
'natural' standards may permit.
The Coming Clean
Campaign has been working to clean up the natural and organic personal care
industry for the past six years. To view Certification Commitment Contract, the
NOSB Recommendation or for other information on the Coming Clean Campaign, go
to: https://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/index.cfm
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots 501(c)3 nonprofit public interest organization, and the only organization in the U.S. focused exclusively on promoting the views and interests of the nation's estimated 50 million consumers of organically and socially responsibly produced food and other products. OCA educates and advocates on behalf of organic consumers, engages consumers in marketplace pressure campaigns, and works to advance sound food and farming policy through grassroots lobbying. We address crucial issues around food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic engineering, children's health, corporate accountability, Fair Trade, environmental sustainability, including pesticide use, and other food- and agriculture-related topics.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and Brasília's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular