Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates

 

Progressive Community

The press releases posted here have been submitted by

America's Progressive Community

For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 17, 2009
10:30 AM

CONTACT: Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR)

Alan Barber, (202) 293-5380 x115

Cost Effectiveness of the Most Widely Cited Think Tanks

CEPR is #1 in Media Hits and Web Traffic in 2008

WASHINGTON - September 17 - The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) moved up from 25th most-cited to 15th most-cited in the annual survey of think tanks compiled by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR).1 Of the 25 think tanks in the FAIR study, our analysis shows that CEPR was once again the most cost-effective think tank in 2008 measured by both media citations and web traffic. It ranked first in media citations per budget dollar for the fifth consecutive year. It also ranked first in web traffic per budget dollar. CEPR has been first in web traffic per budget dollar in three of the last five years, while in the other two years it came in second.

In terms of media citations per budget dollar, the Lexington Institute and the Economic Policy Institute remained in second and third, respectively, for the second year in a row. While the think tanks in the third through tenth positions were closely bunched, there was a large gap in the number of media hits per dollar between the number three and number four positions, with the Economic Policy Institute getting more than twice the citations per budget dollar as the Inter-American Dialogue.

In a year that saw an across-the-board drop in web traffic per budget dollar, CEPR was once again the most cost-effective, with a ratio of web traffic to budget of 1.99. CEPR was followed closely by the Cato Institute with a 1.88 rating. The next three think tanks were the Heritage Foundation, the Economic Policy Institute, and the New America Foundation.   The big budget think tanks (e.g. the Brookings Institution, the Heritage Foundation, and the American Enterprise Institute) dominated news coverage because of their size. However, they are also becoming somewhat more efficient, with CATO ranking second in web traffic per budget dollar and Heritage ranking third.

The following tables compare the cost effectiveness of the top 25 most-cited think tanks in 2008, based on a Nexis search conducted by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). The first table compares media citations in 2008 to budgets for 2007, the most recent year for which budgets were available for all organizations. The second table compares web reach over the last 3 months to the organizational budgets for 2007.   Table 1 shows that CEPR led in media citations per budget dollar, with 1.85 citations per $10,000, according to FAIR's calculation. The Lexington Institute had 1.15 citations per $10,000, and the Economic Policy Institute had 0.96 citations.

Media Ciations per Dollar

Table 2 shows that CEPR ranked first in cost effectiveness of web traffic with a rating of 1.99. The CATO Institute ranked second, with a rating of 1.88, and the Economic Policy Institute ranked third, with a rating of 1.62.

Website Usage per Dollar

Appendix

Media Citations: The number of media citations for 2008 was taken from Dolny, Michael. "Right Ebbs, Left Gains as 'Media Experts'." Extra! September 3, 2009. FAIR used Nexis to determine media citations.

Internet Reach: Internet reach was taken from daily reach statistics found on Alexa.com. The daily average over the prior three months was used, as reported on September 14, 2009.   Think Tank Budgets: FY2007 budgets are defined as the total organization expenses listed in the tax forms filed by each think tank and were obtained from:

  • Charity Navigator (American Enterprise Institute, Aspen Institute, Brookings, Carter Center, Cato Institute, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Council on Foreign Relations, Economic Policy Institute, Heritage Foundation, Institute for International Economics, Inter-American Dialogue, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, New America Foundation, RAND Corporation)
  • GuideStar (Carnegie Endowment, Center for American Progress, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, Kaiser Family Foundation, Lexington Institute, Public Policy Institute of California, Urban Institute),
  • or its own website (Hoover Institute)
  • The Center for Politics declined to disclose its budgetary data.

This analysis uses budgets for 2007 because data for 2008 were not available for most of the think tanks in FAIR's study.

FAIR Think Tank Rankings (Media Citations):

Citations of Think Tanks in Media


End Notes

  1. Dolny, Michael.  "Right Ebbs, Left Gains as 'Media Experts'." Extra! 09/03/09.
  2. Political orientation is based on FAIR's evaluation of published work and media comments.
  3. Media citations are from Dolny, Michael.  "Right Ebbs, Left Gains as 'Media Experts." Extra! 09/03/09.
  4. Think Tank budgets are for Fiscal year 2007, the most recent year available. Fiscal years vary according to organizational calendar.
  5. Political orientation is based on FAIR's evaluation of published work and media comments.
  6. Website usage is expressed as numbers of users per million (daily internet reach) as determined by Alexa.com  Daily internet reach is calculated as an average over a three-month period ending on September 14, 2009.
  7. Cost effectiveness of web traffic is a ratio of the percentage of site visitors of a given organization (as determined by Alexa.com) and the organization's budget.
  8. Think Tank budgets are for Fiscal Year 2007, the most recent year available. Fiscal years vary according to organizational calendar.

View this publication on CEPR's website (includes sharing tools).

###

The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) was established in 1999 to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. In order for citizens to effectively exercise their voices in a democracy, they should be informed about the problems and choices that they face. CEPR is committed to presenting issues in an accurate and understandable manner, so that the public is better prepared to choose among the various policy options.