August, 31 2009, 02:21pm EDT
EPA Data Reveal Far Reach of Toxic Coal Ash Threats
Details from 584 coal ash sites in 35 states finally released; public health at risk
WASHINGTON
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has just unveiled information
to environmental groups about America's toxic coal ash dumps after
months of data collection and inquiry. The groups, after a Freedom of
Information Act request, discovered late last Friday that there are 584
coal ash dump sites across the country -- almost twice as many as
previously identified. These sites pose significant cancer and health
risks that so far have gone unchecked.
Because the EPA does not regulate the waste from coal-fired power
plants, the agency had no information on the location and nature of the
584 wet ash dumps located throughout the EPA has acknowledged that wet
disposal of coal ash presents a greater risk to human health and the
environment than dry landfills because hazardous chemicals are more
likely to migrate from such dumps and the large impoundments present a
risk of catastrophic failure.
The EPA data note ownership, location, hazard potential, year
commissioned, type and quantity of coal combustion waste disposed,
dates of the last regulatory or company assessment, and in some
instances whether an unregulated discharge of coal ash had occurred.
Some critical data were not included because companies claimed the data
as "Confidential Business Information."
States with coal ash sites included in the list are: Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa,
Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts,
Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, North
Carolina, North Dakota, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia,
Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
"There is no lingering doubt, these coal ash dumps are dangerous and
must be regulated immediately," said Lisa Evans, an attorney at
Earthjustice. "The EPA list provides a clear view of the substantial
extent of the threat. Now the agency needs to take the next step and
ensure that communities are informed and protected against the
possibility of another TVA-like tragedy."
On March 9, the EPA sent letters to hundreds of power generating facilities
requesting information about coal ash surface impoundments. The letters
were in response to the disaster that occurred on December 22, 2008, at
the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant in Harriman, TN.
Over 1 billion gallons of coal ash sludge flooded 300 acres in and near
the Emory River when a dike at a coal ash pond collapsed, destroying
homes and property and poisoning surrounding waters and wildlife.
"Recovery from this massive spill will take years, and the price tag
for the clean up continues to grow," said Lyndsay Moseley, Sierra Club
representative and Tennessee native. "It was a stark reminder that coal
is not clean or cheap, and this information should prompt improved
safety practices and regulation of coal ash sites across the country."
The data released last Friday reveal the problems are much more
widespread than EPA previously thought. The wet disposal of coal ash
and affect communities in 35 states, with concentrations of dangerous
dumps in the Midwest, Appalachia, Intermountain West and Southeast. The
data reveal that the majority of dump sites are over three decades old
-- raising questions about the structural integrity of their dams and
whether the waste ponds are adequately lined. Most older dump sites are
not lined to prevent the migration of harmful chemicals to drinking
water. The data reveal also that regulatory inspections of these dams
by state and federal agencies are infrequent or non-existent.
EPA's data also indicate that many of the wet dumps are very large,
with over a hundred exceeding 50 acres, including numerous sites
comprising several hundred acres. Furthermore the largest dumps tend to
be the older sites with the least amount of protection. The problems
are likely underestimated by the present data set because companies
like Duke Energy, Alabama Power, Georgia Power and Progress Energy have
withheld information on 74 dump sites, including some of the largest
dump sites in the U.S, claiming the information is "confidential
business information."
"Some utilities -- notably the Duke and Southern Companies -- are
hiding the ball, withholding data on their ash ponds that their
competitors have already provided to EPA," said Eric Schaeffer,
executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project. "Let's hope
that EPA's enforcement program puts a stop to these bogus claims of
'confidentiality,' and compels the disclosure of data that companies
are required to report."
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has said the agency is developing
rules to govern disposal and storage of coal ash, and expects a
proposal by the end of this year. Coal ash sites contain harmful levels
of arsenic, lead, mercury and other toxins, which can leach out, slowly
contaminating drinking water sources. Recently the EPA identified 49
"high hazard" sites, whose failure would be likely to cause loss of
life, after an information request by Earthjustice, Sierra Club and
EIP. These sites had been deemed by the Department of Homeland Security
to pose such a threat to nearby communities that they revealing their
location had been deemed a national security risk.
"This is a wake up call to the EPA to regulate coal ash as a
hazardous waste and protect our health and environment," Evans said.
"Communities have a right to know the dangers posed by these largely
unlined, unmonitored, and uninspected impoundments. Increased cancer
risks, poisoned drinking water supplies, the possibility of a lingering
threat for decades all mean that the EPA must regulate coal ash as
hazardous waste to ensure that all communities are protected."
But despite the obvious threats posed by coal ash dumps, 25 senators
(nine Democrats and 16 Republicans) signed a letter supporting federal
regulation that would let the utility companies off the hook.
"Research has made it clear that coal ash is becoming increasingly
toxic. In fact the cancer risk of people living near some coal ash
sites is a staggering 1 in 50," said Mary Anne Hitt, Deputy Director of
the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign. "Despite those chilling
statistics, there are still no federal rules in place for safe disposal
of coal ash. Coal ash should be treated like the hazardous substance it
is, governed by strong rules to protect communities and hold the coal
industry accountable for the risks posed by its toxic waste."
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
As Biden Heads to Border, Amnesty Says Ditch 'Cruel' Anti-Migrant Policies
"We challenge President Biden to stop his blatant disregard for the right to seek asylum and his continued politicizing of migrant rights and lives."
Feb 28, 2024
Just ahead of U.S. President Joe Biden's planned trip to a Texas border city, Amnesty International USA on Wednesday urged the Democrat to "abandon cruel anti-immigrant proposals" he is weighing after a controversial package opposed by rights groups and progressive lawmakers recently failed to get through the divided Congress.
"With President Biden visiting the border this week, he should remember that he once campaigned on a promise to restore the United States' role as a safe haven for refugees and asylum-seekers. Instead, his policies of deterrence have caused a humanitarian catastrophe along the border," said Amy Fischer, the group's director of refugee and migrant rights, in a statement.
Biden, who is seeking reelection in November, is scheduled to travel to Brownsville "to meet with U.S. Border Patrol agents, law enforcement, and local leaders," according toPolitico. The White House confirmed those plans Monday, after it was announced former President Donald Trump, the likely GOP nominee, is set to visit Eagle Pass, Texas, the same day.
"President Biden must use this visit to meet with asylum-seekers who had to flee extreme violence and insecurity in their home countries, only to face extortion, kidnapping, and sexual violence as they were waiting in Mexico due to his cruel asylum ban," Fischer said. "And he must also meet with the incredible organizations and volunteers who are on the frontlines of our migration crisis, welcoming people seeking safety, and exemplifying a model for what safe and welcoming border systems can look like."
"Days after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's attack on Annunciation House's long history of welcoming immigrants, it is critical for Biden to hear ideas and solutions from the frontline nongovernmental organizations who know first-hand the solutions of a functional asylum reception system," Fischer continued.
Paxton, a Republican, is trying to shut down the faith-based organization that has aided migrants in El Paso for decades, claiming that "information strongly suggesting Annunciation House is engaged in legal violations such as facilitating illegal entry to the United States, alien harboring, human smuggling, and operating a stash house."
The Catholic group said in a statement last week that "the attorney general's illegal, immoral, and anti-faith position to shut down Annunciation House is unfounded," and its efforts to help migrants are "no different from that of the schools who enroll children of refugees, the clinics and hospitals who care for the needs of refugees, and the churches, synagogues, and mosques who welcome families to join in worship."
While groups like Annunciation House have welcomed migrants, Republican Texas leaders, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have prioritized limiting access to the state and sending away those who make it there, often with legally dubious actions. Rights advocates, including Amnesty, are urging Biden to distinguish himself from the likes of Abbott and Trump—who has threatened mass deportations if he returns to power.
According toThe New York Times:
Mr. Trump plans to deliver remarks from the border to highlight the immigration crisis and lay blame at the feet of Mr. Biden, according to a person close to Mr. Trump who was not authorized to discuss the plans publicly.
Mr. Trump is expected to highlight crimes committed by migrants in New York and in other cities, as well as the arrest of a Venezuelan undocumented immigrant in the recent high-profile killing of a 22-year-old nursing student in Georgia, the person added.
"We challenge President Biden to stop his blatant disregard for the right to seek asylum and his continued politicizing of migrant rights and lives," said Fischer. "We challenge him to abandon his cruel proposals that echo Trump's anti-immigrant playbook, and instead to advance policies that would ensure both the protection of human rights and an orderly border."
"President Biden needs to find the political courage to rise above the growing tide of xenophobia and return to his promise to push for commonsense solutions that center safety and human rights," she added. "Until he does that, he'll only be on a race to the bottom as far as who can be the cruelest to those who need protection."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Judge Disqualifies Trump From Illinois Ballot, Citing Jan 6 Role
The decision comes ahead of a highly anticipated U.S. Supreme Court ruling on a Colorado challenge to the 2024 GOP front-runner's candidacy based on the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause.
Feb 28, 2024
An Illinois judge ruled Wednesday that former U.S. President Donald Trump cannot appear on the state's presidential primary and general election ballots because of his role in the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection.
Judge Tracie Porter of the State Circuit Court in Cook County sided with Illinois voters who asserted that Trump—the 2024 GOP front-runner—must be disqualified from Illinois' March 19 primary and November 5 general election ballots due to his violation of the 14th Amendment's so-called "insurrection clause."
Porter, a Democrat, placed a stay on her ruling if Trump appeals by Thursday, or if the U.S. Supreme Court issues a highly anticipated ruling in a Colorado case involving a 14th Amendment challenge.
"This is a historic victory," said Ron Fein, legal director of Free Speech for People, the co-lead counsel in the case. "Every court or official that has addressed the merits of Trump's constitutional eligibility has found that he engaged in insurrection after taking the oath of office and is therefore disqualified from the presidency."
Enacted after the Civil War, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment bars from public office any "officer of the United States" who has taken an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution but then participates in an insurrection or rebellion against the country. The text does not require a criminal conviction for the clause to apply.
Plaintiffs' attorney Caryn Lederer called the ruling "a critical decision that is adding to decisions in Colorado and Maine on this point."
Last month, a Maine judge deferred a ruling on yet another insurrection clause challenge, citing the Supreme Court's Colorado case.
Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump's campaign, said that "today, an activist Democrat judge in Illinois summarily overruled the state's Board of Elections and contradicted earlier decisions from dozens of other state and federal jurisdictions."
"This is an unconstitutional ruling that we will quickly appeal," he added.
According toThe New York Times, courts in at least 18 states have dismissed or rejected efforts to exclude Trump from the ballot on 14th Amendment grounds, while unresolved challenges remain in 15 states.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Senate GOP Blocks Effort to Federally Protect IVF Access
"Remember this the next time they claim to care about freedom and family," said one Democratic lawmaker.
Feb 28, 2024
Democratic U.S. lawmakers and reproductive rights defenders on Wednesday blasted congressional Republicans and former U.S. President Donald Trump after a GOP senator blocked a bill to protect access to in vitro fertilization a week after Alabama's right-wing Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are children.
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) objected to a request to pass by unanimous consent a bill introduced by Sens. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) to federally protect IVF access, claiming that the bill is "a vast overreach that is full of poison pills that go way too far."
Calling the bill "a vast overreach that is full of poison pills that go way too far," Hyde-Smith claimed it would legalize human cloning, gene-edited "designer babies," and commercial surrogacy, "including for young girls without parental involvement."
Duckworth accused her colleague of misreading the legislation, asserting that "it simply says you have a statutory right should you choose to pursue assisted reproductive technology."
Democratic lawmakers reacted angrily to Hyde-Smith's move—and to Republican attacks on reproductive freedom.
"Once again, Republicans have shown their true colors,"
said Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). "Republicans are claiming to support IVF while voting down the very bill that would do that. Actions speak louder than words."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)
said on social media: "I wish I could say I'm surprised. Senate Republicans just blocked our attempt to pass Sen. Duckworth's bill to protect nationwide access to IVF. Republicans will stop at nothing to deny women in America their fundamental rights and freedoms."
In the House, Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) lamented Republicans' attack on legislation that would "protect Americans' right to start a family through IVF."
"Remember this the next time they claim to care about freedom and family," Clark added.
Speaking on the Senate floor Wednesday, Duckworth said: "Let's be clear about what led to this moment. The overturning of Roe is what made last week's ruling even possible."
"Donald Trump is the one who bragged about taking down Roe v. Wade," she added. "Donald Trump acts as if that's something to be proud of."
Trump—the 2024 Republican presidential front-runner despite facing 91 federal and state criminal charges—appointed three right-wing anti-abortion justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. All three were part of the 6-3 majority in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which voided half a century of federal abortion rights.
Following last week's Alabama ruling—which prompted multiple IVF clinics to suspend operations in the state—Trump and other Republicans scrambled to distance themselves from the deeply unpopular decision.
However, Duckworth said Wednesday that "while it may now be convenient" for Trump "to claim that he had nothing to do with what happened in Alabama, we know the truth: IVF is at risk because of him. He is to blame."
"Him and every other GOP official who shamelessly kisses his ring, proving with every word that they they that they care more about protecting his poll numbers than protecting Americans' freedoms," she added.
At the Center for American Progress, senior vice president for inclusive growth Emily Gee said that "Republicans have been on a relentless crusade to strip women of their fundamental freedom to control their own reproductive destinies and medical decisions—seeking to ban abortion, restrict contraception, and limit fertility options for Americans trying to grow their families."
"They have been emboldened and enabled by Donald Trump and his hand-picked U.S. Supreme Court justices, who have misinterpreted the Constitution to rip away Americans' rights and enforce their extreme MAGA ideology on all of us," she continued.
"Senate Republicans' decision to block legislation affirming Americans' ability to obtain IVF treatment is a moral abomination as well as an insult to families devastated by the Alabama Supreme Court's recent ruling," Gee added. "Today, they have made painstakingly clear that there's no limit to their agenda to intrude upon women's most personal decisions. That is an intrusion that Americans will continue to reject."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular