Get News & Views Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Not to Worry, Rape Victims Who Want An Abortion: We Won't Charge You With Felony Tampering With Evidence, Just Your Doctor
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Obama Administration Compromise Would Implement No-Cost Birth Control
- The Right of the People, Even At the Airport
- To End Extreme Poverty, Let’s Try Ending Extreme Wealth
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Don’t Put a Fork in It: On the Perils of Genetically Engineered Salmon
- Five Possibilities for the Next Great Progressive Push
- An Economic Alternative to Exploitative Free Market Capitalism
- UN Report: Israel Must Immediately Dismantle Settlements or Face ICC
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Congressional Progressive Caucus Carl Rauscher: 202-225-5187 (Woolsey) |
Congressional Progressive Caucus Urges Speaker Pelosi Not to Delay Health Care Reform
WASHINGTON - July 24 - Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, including Co-Chairs Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva and Congresswoman Lynn C. Woolsey, sent the following letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on the upcoming health care reform legislation.
They release the following:
July 24, 2009
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker, US House of Representatives
H-232, US Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
Speaker Pelosi,
Thank you for continuing your strong leadership for health care reform. We write to you on behalf of the Congressional Progressive Caucus to encourage you to take bold action to ensure health care reform is passed in the House.
The time to reform our health care system is now. As Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, we believe that we must not delay a vote on health care reform. The need for reform is urgent. Approximately 14,000 Americans are losing their health care coverage each day and our businesses on Main Street and Wall Street are struggling to recover from our nation's economic crisis.
Madam Speaker, as you are aware the CPC has been actively involved in health reform discussions over the last several months. The CPC is a strong and vocal advocate of a single payer approach. Nonetheless, we stand solidly behind our criteria for a robust public health insurance plan option.
We want to assure you that for our continued support, the public option must not be based on any trigger and must be available immediately. Further, the public plan must be on a level playing field and receive the same subsidies as private plans in the Health Exchange. And, it must be connected to the Medicare infrastructure, including the provider and payment system. Allowing providers to opt out of the public option has already created a loss of $91 billion in savings. We cannot tolerate further weakening of the public option.
We are also concerned about the latest discussion regarding the Independent Medicare Advisory Commission (IMAC). We understand that no final decision has been made. However if discussions move forward to make IMAC a reality, we ask that you include us in discussion as we have concerns with the governance, oversight, and the impact it would have on seniors, people with disabilities , doctors, and hospitals. Furthermore, we are concerned that IMAC could weaken the public option and negate our responsibilities as Members of Congress.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus stands united to provide high quality, affordable and accessible health care choices for all Americans. The Congressional Progressive Caucus stands committed to seeing health care reform pass now. It is time to put Americans back in charge of their health care and have the security and stability they deserve in a health care system.
We look forward to our ongoing involvement in the process.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

4 Comments so far
Show AllI was once told by a person that I considered wise, that when people are really pushing you to get something done in a hurry.... SLOW DOWN. As he explained, it is far better to go slowly and get things right the first time than to hurry up and have to do it over, or ruin the entire project.
WHAT IS THE RUSH?
First, this is not "health care" reform, it is "health INSURANCE" reform... big difference. If we were truly concerned with health care, we'd be pushing for the opening of six hundred or more free clinics, subsidized with tax dollars, and perhaps staffed by doctors and nurses willing to work for a duration of time at a fixed rate in order to pay down student loans.
Second, we've survived for a long time without a national health care system. I fully support that we need a 'national' system, one that at least provides diagnostic sevices to everybody, pre-natal treatment for pregnant women, emergency services and affordable medications. So far as I can see, we're not there yet.
I believe that the president should shut up and allow congress to investigate the options and come up with a plan that might benifit the public, not health insurance companies. Our form of government is SUPPOSE TO provide for congress to enact legislation and for the president to enforce legislation once enacted. This RUSH job smells like a sun baked fish, two days old.
this fight has gone on for 70 YEARS who says no hurry?
In this country, the attention span is short. If something isn't done soon, some other butterfly will flit and flitter by and the dog's going to chase IT! I'd say pass a reform plan that is as good as possible now, and then improve on it. We need something more concrete on which to build. A public option would be a beginning. If it flies, then maybe a Universal Single Payer plan would be next. Obviously HR 676 isn't going to make it at this time, or so it seems. So we need to at least open the door to the idea, which a public option might do. Just a thought.
"Second, we've survived for a long time without a national health care system."
Great points all over this post - except for the above.
Many of us haven't survived without a national health care system.