June, 30 2009, 03:08pm EDT
Environmental Justice Advocates Testify: Repeal Bush-Era Hazardous Waste Loophole
Rule deregulates 1.5 million tons of toxic waste, puts low-income and communities of color at increased risk
WASHINGTON
Environmental justice advocates from around the country traveled
to Arlington, Virginia today to ask the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency to repeal a Bush-era hazardous waste loophole and restore
safeguards to prevent toxic spills and contamination.
The rule, which went into effect in the closing days of the last
administration, stripped federal oversight of recyclers who handle 1.5
million tons of hazardous waste generated by steel, chemical,
pharmaceutical and other industrial companies each year.
As the maps here show,
these hazardous waste recyclers are located predominantly in low-income
communities and communities of color. Concerned about the increased
risk these communities now face, environmental justice advocates
testified at today's EPA public hearing at the agency's headquarters.
Cancer survivor Sheila Holt-Orsted made the trip from her
cancer-riddled community in Dixon County, Tennessee, where the nearby
county landfill was home to toxic waste dumping.
"I showed up today so that EPA could put a face to this issue," said
Holt-Orsted, who has seen her mother, father, sister, cousins, aunts,
and uncles suffer from cancer and other illnesses believed to be caused
by the nearby contamination. "I'm concerned that this rule may endanger
the health and environment that our country's hazardous waste laws were
designed to protect. I don't want any other community to suffer as my
family has suffered."
Advocates are closely watching the administration's response, saying
it represents the first test of the new EPA's approach toward
environmental policies which burden low income and communities of color.
"We should not forget that some 27 years ago, the environmental
justice movement was born after a sham recycler dumped PCB-laced oils
along the roads in North Carolina which eventually ended up in a
majority African-American community," said Dr. Robert Bullard, director
of Environmental Justice Resource Center at Clark University, and
author of Dumping In Dixie: Race, Class, And Environmental Quality.
"This new rule puts in jeopardy many of the communities we have found
to be disproportionately burdened by environmental contamination."
The rule specifically applies to hazardous waste recyclers --
already acknowledged by EPA to be a notoriously unstable and dangerous
industry: recent EPA studies identify hundreds of contaminated sites
from hazardous waste recycling operations in 38 states, including more
than 100 Superfund sites, totaling more than $436 million in cleanup
costs. (Regional maps detailing the location of these Superfund sites
with corresponding socio-economic data are here. The EPA study summary is here. A state-by-state table is here. Detailed site profiles are here)
"This loophole represents the largest hazardous waste rollback since
the passage of laws protecting the public from hazardous waste in
1976," said Earthjustice attorney Lisa Evans, who filed a lawsuit
in federal court in January challenging the midnight rulemaking by the
Bush administration. "Before this change, these facilities had to
follow strict rules designed to keep communities safe: closely tracking
hazardous waste, storing it in clearly-labeled, airtight and leak-proof
containers. But not any more."
EPA officials have acknowledged that the Bush rule change was a
hasty one. In the rush to finalize it, the officials failed to fully
comply with the law: the new rule violates a Clinton-era executive
order requiring federal agencies to address the adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on
communities of color and low-income populations.
"This rule would redistribute extremely harmful toxic substances to
places where oversight is lax or nonexistent," said Vernice
Miller-Travis, vice chair of the Maryland Commission on Environmental
Justice and Sustainable Communities. "This is a critical issue. The
health of thousands of communities across the country hangs in the
balance."
The hazardous waste that will slip through this loophole contains
such dangerous chemicals as solvents, such as benzene, toluene, TCE and
perchlorate that cause cancer, birth defects, lupus and immune
disorders; and metals such as lead, hexavalent chromium, mercury and
arsenic -- which are potent neurotoxins and carcinogens.
"There is no principled basis to relax these hazardous waste
regulations," said Jan Schlichtmann, founder of The Civil Action Center
and the attorney who John Travolta's character in the feature-length
film A Civil Action was based on. "If anyone thinks we should go back
to a time of less hazardous waste regulation, they should speak to the
parents in the cities of Woburn, Massachusetts and Toms River, New
Jersey, where contaminants polluted the city drinking water and caused
a leukemia epidemic of biblical proportions."
More than 5,600 facilities involved in hazardous waste recycling are
expected to take advantage of the loophole -- which the government
estimates will save each facility about $17,000 a year.
Additional Resources:
For background documents, including a 2007 EPA study summarizing
problems with hazardous waste recycling operations, a map of hazardous
waste facilities with bad track records, and a state-by-state table of
polluted hazardous waste recycling sites, please visit: https://www.earthjustice.org/library/features/toxic-waste-speak-out.html
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
Joe Lieberman, Iraq War Cheerleader and Killer of Public Option, Dead at 82
"Joe Lieberman's legacy will live on as your medical debt."
Mar 27, 2024
While current and former officials across the U.S. political spectrum shared praise for and fond memories of former Sen. Joe Lieberman in response to news of his death on Wednesday, critics highlighted how some of his key positions led to the deaths of many others.
Lieberman's family said the 82-year-old died at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital after a fall at his home in the Bronx. He served in the Connecticut Senate, as the state's attorney general, and in the U.S. Senate—initially as a Democrat and eventually as an Independent. He was also Democratic former Vice President Al Gore's running mate in the 2000 presidential election.
"Up until the very end, Joe Lieberman enjoyed the high-quality, government-financed healthcare that he worked diligently to deny the rest of us. That's his legacy," said Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, which advocates for universal, single-payer healthcare.
As Warren Gunnels, majority staff director for Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.),
explained, "Joe Lieberman led the effort to ensure the Affordable Care Act did not include a public option or a reduction in the Medicare eligibility age to 55."
Noting that Lieberman also lied about the presence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq—which was used to justify the 2003 U.S. invasion—Gunnels asked, "How many people unnecessarily died as a result?"
He was far from alone in highlighting the two defining positions.
The Lever's David Sirota declared, "RIP Joe Lieberman, Iraq War cheerleader who led the fight to make sure Medicare was not extended to millions of Americans who desperately needed the kind of healthcare coverage he enjoyed in the Senate."
The Debt Collective said on social media that "Joe Lieberman killed so many people when he killed the public option. Not to mention all the people he killed by cheerleading every war and every lie that led to war. A truly horrible person with a shameful legacy."
Journalist Jon Schwarz pointed out that Lieberman continued to lie about the WMDs long after the claims were debunked.
FormerMSNBC host Mehdi Hasan noted that Lieberman declined an opportunity to apologize for the disastrous war, sharing a clip from his on-camera interview with the ex-senator in 2021.
And please don\u2019t give me this \u2018don\u2019t speak ill of the dead\u2019 stuff - 1) I\u2019m not speaking ill, I\u2019m stating facts, and 2) public figures are public figures, and their obits reflect their legacies and so we should be honest in our accounts of their legacies. Not offensive but honest— (@)
"We lost a giant today. I often disagreed with Joe Lieberman but he was always honorable in the way he called for American troops to murder people abroad so he could get his jollies," said Matt Stoller of the American Economic Liberties Project in a series of sarcastic social media posts.
"Joe Lieberman balanced his love of other people fighting in immoral wars with a commitment to preventing Americans from getting healthcare," Stoller added. "Even after his Senate career, he showed his strong democratic values by lobbying for Chinese telecom firms. We will miss this man."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Enough Is Enough': Ireland Joins ICJ Genocide Case Against Israel
"What we saw on October 7 in Israel, and what we are seeing in Gaza now, represents the blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale," said one top Irish official.
Mar 27, 2024
Citing Israel's "blatant" human rights violations in Gaza, Ireland's second-highest-ranking official said Wednesday that the country will join the South Africa-led genocide case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
Irish Tánaiste Micheál Martin—the equivalent of a deputy prime minister in other parliamentary nations—said that Ireland decided to intervene in the case after analyzing the "legal and policy issues" pertaining to the case under review by the United Nations' top court.
"It is for the court to determine whether genocide is being committed," Martin—who also serves as Ireland's foreign and defense minister—said in a statement. "But I want to be clear in reiterating what I have said many times in the last few months; what we saw on October 7 in Israel, and what we are seeing in Gaza now, represents the blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale."
Martin continued:
The taking of hostages. The purposeful withholding of humanitarian assistance to civilians. The targeting of civilians and of civilian infrastructure. The indiscriminate use of explosive weapons in populated areas. The use of civilian objects for military purposes. The collective punishment of an entire population.
The list goes on. It has to stop. The view of the international community is clear. Enough is enough. The U.N. Security Council has demanded an immediate cease-fire, the unconditional release of hostages, and the lifting of all barriers to the provision of humanitarian assistance at scale. The European Council has echoed this call.
South Africa's case—which is supported by over 30 countries, the Arab League, African Union, and others—incisively details Israel's conduct in the war, including the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, mostly women and children; the wounding of tens of thousands more; the forcible displacement of 90% of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million people; and the inflicting of conditions leading to widespread starvation and disease. The filing also cited numerous genocidal statements by Israeli officials.
On January 26, the ICJ issued a preliminary ruling that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza and ordered its government and military to prevent genocidal acts. Palestinian and international human rights defenders say Israel has ignored the order.
A draft report
released this week by the U.N.'s Human Rights Council found "reasonable grounds to believe" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a move that came on the same day as the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire in the ongoing war.
"The situation could not be more stark; half the population of Gaza face imminent famine and 100% of the population face acute food insecurity," said Martin. "As the U.N. secretary-general said as he inspected long lines of blocked relief trucks waiting to enter Gaza during his visit to Rafah at the weekend: 'It is time to truly flood Gaza with lifesaving aid. The choice is clear: surge or starvation.' I echo his words today."
In a St. Partick's Day White House meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden—a staunch supporter of Israel—Irish Toaiseach (Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar, who announced earlier this month that he would soon step down, said that "the Irish people are deeply troubled about the catastrophe that's unfolding before our eyes in Gaza."
"And when I travel the world, leaders often ask me why the Irish have such empathy for the Palestinian people," he added. "And the answer is simple: We see our history in their eyes—a story of displacement, of dispossession and national identity questioned and denied, forced emigration, discrimination, and now hunger."
Keep ReadingShow Less
House Democrat Calls GOP Budget a 'Blueprint for a Dystopian Hellscape'
Rep. Don Beyer warns the plan "would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
Mar 27, 2024
As Republicans on Wednesday set their sights on a key seat opening up in the U.S. House of Representatives, the chamber's senior Democrat on the congressional Joint Economic Committee put out a blistering takedown of a top GOP budget proposal for the next fiscal year.
Congressman Don Beyer (D-Va.) took aim at the 180-page "Fiscal Sanity to Save America" plan released last week by the Republican Study Committee (RSC)—which includes about 80% of GOP House members—following proposals from Democratic President Joe Biden and House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas).
"The Republican Study Committee budget is a blueprint for a dystopian hellscape," he warned. "The vision offered by this group, which counts 4 in 5 House Republicans as members, would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
RSC proposals to "dramatically weaken healthcare," Beyer noted, include turning Medicare into a voucher plan and rolling back Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions that cut costs for seniors; repealing tax subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and the law's protections for people with preexisting conditions; and transforming Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program into block grants to states.
As Common Dreams has reported, in addition to seeking cuts to Medicare and Social Security—while claiming to do nothing of the sort—the RSC has also launched a full-fledged assault on reproductive healthcare and rights, promoting 42 bills that would ban abortions after 15 weeks or even earlier, require unnecessary ultrasounds and 24-hour waiting periods, prohibit the use of fetal stem cells for research, and threaten access to in vitro fertilization, among other restrictions.
In addition to attacking reproductive freedom and key programs for seniors and low-income families, Beyer highlighted, the RSC wants to "weaken public health, public safety, and environmental protections," while "cutting taxes for the wealthy, by a lot."
The RSC advocates ending green tax credits from the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act as well as slashing money for Community Oriented Policing Services and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The committee also calls for permanently lowering taxes for the ultrarich, indexing capital gains taxes to inflation, repealing the estate tax, rolling back the IRA's corporate alternative minimum tax, and eliminating funding intended to help the Internal Revenue Service catch wealthy tax cheats.
"Democrats believe there is a better way to get our fiscal house in order without betraying our values," said Beyer. "That starts with making smart investments in our people and our future while demanding that the rich and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. The contrast between the Democratic approach and this Republican budget could not possibly be clearer."
Biden's budget blueprint—released as he prepares for an electoral rematch against former Republican President Donald Trump, who infamously cut taxes for rich people and corporations—proposes a 25% minimum tax for individuals with wealth of more than $100 million, along with ending capital income tax breaks and closing other loopholes.
Polling results released Tuesday by Morning Consult show that a majority of voters across party lines in key swing states support raising taxes on people who make more than $400,000 per year.
Biden and the divided Congress this past weekend narrowly avoided a government shutdown by passing a long-delayed spending package. Fiscal year 2025 is set to begin in October, setting up another election-year fight over funding.
In what's been
dubbed the "Great Resignation," a growing number of House Republicans have announced that they are not seeking reelection or even exited their seats early—shrinking the party's already slim majority in the lower chamber.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular