|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Progressive Caucus, Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, and Asian and Pacific American Caucus |
Caucuses Unite Behind Public Health Insurance Plan Option
WASHINGTON - April 28 - In an unprecedented initiative, the leaders of four prominent groups in the 111th Congress - the Progressive Caucus (CPC), the Black Caucus (CBC), the Hispanic Caucus (CHC), and the Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) - have sent a joint letters to President Obama and the Democratic Leadership of the House and Senate stressing that ‘our support for enacting legislation this year to guarantee affordable health care for all firmly hinges on the inclusion of a robust public health insurance plan like Medicare.'
Together, one hundred seventeen Members of the House and Senate belong to at least one of these four congressional caucuses. Hence, their unity in pushing for inclusion of a public health insurance plan like Medicare as part of comprehensive health care reform legislation is a formidable development in the unfolding policy debate inside and outside of Congress.
"As the debate on health care moves forward, we stand together with one voice for the communities that most need this reform," said Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez, Chairwoman of the 24-Member CHC. "With one out of every three Hispanics in our country likely to be uninsured and with so many Latino small business owners, we have to provide all Americans with the choice of a public health insurance plan."
"The United States is the only industrialized nation in the world that does not provide universal health care," said Congresswoman Barbara Lee, Chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus. "In a nation with 46 million uninsured individuals, it is time we put in place high quality comprehensive care for all. As we develop healthcare reform legislation, a public health insurance plan like Medicare and Medicaid must be included in order to guarantee equal access to quality affordable healthcare for everyone."
"The importance of this issue is shown through the unity of the four caucuses," said Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva, Co-Chair of the CPC. "We represent the most underrepresented communities, in which livelihoods are paralyzed due to health care being set as a privilege. We stand united to ensure health care is a right. A right that is fair and guaranteed for all."
"The American people are united in declaring that our health care system is broken, and that we need to fix it," said Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, Co-Chair of the CPC. "With this letter, more than a 100 Members of Congress are sending a message that we share the public's outrage, and that we are committed to confronting this problem and developing a health care system that doesn't leave anyone out. That's why we need to make certain that any final healthcare reform legislation includes the option of a public health insurance plan to ensure that everyone has access to high quality, affordable care."
"For too long, insurance companies have dictated the quality, quantity, and accessibility of healthcare to the American people," said Congressman Mike Honda, Chair of Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC). "A robust public health insurance plan will ensure true competition with those companies that reap egregious profits, and will present the opportunity to make deep, lasting changes in our healthcare system. A public plan will also provide a framework to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities in some of the most underserved communities."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
4 Comments so far
Show Allhe Caucuses need to be very specific in demanding Single-Payer and On top of that the entire convention passed a resolution asking the president to consider Single-Payer as the plan to implement Universal coverage.
WHY don't they just endorse the single-payer bill already in Congress with
75 co-sponsors, HR-676 (Expanded and Improved Medicare For All Act)? This
has already been endorsed by over 500 labor organizations and many others.
The "public insurance inclusion option" wording is ambiguous, and easily
interpreted as enabling more subsidy to the health insurance industry. In
fact, the status quo is private health insurance with the "inclusion" of
Medicare and Medicaid to cover the most medically costly segment of the
population, leaving profitable clients to private insurance with consequent
waste and inefficiency. A mere "inclusion" of a public component as
suggested by these various caucuses will cost taxpayers far more than a true
single-payer system. We must move beyond "inclusion" to the single-payer
health care system that we really need.
Consider the following letter by James R Hughes MD, published in the
26APR09 Valley News (Lebanon NH):
Health Care: The Full Loaf
"Half a loaf is better than none", runs the adage. But if the size, shape,
and cost of the full loaf are unknown, what's "half a loaf"? Is it smart to
negotiate from a compromise position-from half a loaf-without an
understanding of what the full loaf looks like? Shouldn't "the whole loaf"
be on the table?
"Single payer" is health care's full loaf. Best we define that full loaf
before we decide what to compromise away. Here's my list.
* Everybody in, nobody out.
* Universal for all Americans
* Everybody pays in, according to ability to pay
* Free choice of physician
* Physician paid by government, not hired by government
* Quality of care incentives
* Emphasis on primary care and prevention
* Not tied to employer or employment
* "Portable" throughout the USA
* Costs controlled by voters, not by "market"
* Benefit package set by voters, not by "market"
* No profit-taking investors
* No incentive for competing health plans to provide less care for the
dollar
* Almost no financial paper-work for you or your doctor
* A confidential electronic medical record that travels with you
* Freedom to purchase added private "sesame seed sprinkles" to top the full
loaf.
Negotiations are accelerating. Single payer is the gold standard and the
full loaf. Other nations have it. If you were to be satisfied by "half a
loaf" for Americans, which of the above would you take off the table?
This is not what happened at the California Democratic Convention with the Progressive Caucus. I do not know about the others, but I was at the progressives caucus meeting and they called for SINGLE-PAYER Healthcare not just Universal. On top of that the entire convention passed a resolution asking the president to consider Single-Payer as the plan to implement Universal coverage.
I also support Single-Payer as the best option for national health care reform. The public plan option being discussed in Washington will not cover everyone in America or control cost. The Caucuses need to be very specific in demanding Single-Payer and not confusing it with the public plan option which will not be as effective since they plan to keep the insurance industry and therefore their excessive costs in play.