EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Public Citizen Phone: 202-588-1000 |
Florida Bar’s Advertising Rules Unconstitutionally Restrict Free Speech on the Internet
Restrictions Keep Public in Dark About Lawyer Services
WASHINGTON - April 1 - The Florida Bar's rules governing lawyer advertising on the Internet violate the free speech rights of lawyers by holding them accountable for reviews that former clients post on consumer Web sites, even though the lawyers have no control over what clients write, according to a suit Public Citizen filed today in federal court on behalf of a Boca Raton attorney.
The Florida Bar prohibits lawyers from advertising client testimonials and the results of past cases. The Bar told Joel B. Rothman, the plaintiff in the case, that his use of Avvo, an online lawyer directory, violated these rules. Rothman had asked several former clients to post reviews of his work on the site, but had no control over what the clients wrote. When the Bar told Rothman that the reviews were prohibited, Avvo refused to remove the reviews from the site.
The Bar's rules not only violate Rothman's First Amendment right to engage in truthful commercial advertising on the Internet, but also restrict competition by making it more difficult for consumers to make informed choices on legal representation, said Greg Beck, the Public Citizen attorney handling the case. Rothman is also represented by Bruce Rogow, a lawyer and professor of constitutional law at Nova Southeastern University.
"Reviews from past clients, whether positive or negative, can tell consumers a lot about a lawyer," Beck said. "Restricting this information makes it more difficult for consumers to choose which lawyer to hire. It also gives lawyers less reason to compete by providing high-quality legal services."
The suit asks the court to declare the Florida Bar's advertising rules unconstitutional.
Public Citizen successfully sued New York disciplinary authorities over that state's advertising rules, which a court ruled unconstitutional. That case is on appeal. Public Citizen also has filed a similar suit in Louisiana. The court in the Louisiana case delayed the implementation of the state's advertising rules, which had been scheduled to take effect in December.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

1 Comment so far
Show AllA little-known legal restriction on U.S. public diplomacy, despite being rendered unenforceable long ago by technological advances like the Internet,continues to damage America's global communication efforts.
At issue is Section 501 of the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (Smith-Mundt Act), the legislation underlying America's overseas informational and cultural programs.While the act is rightly hailed for establishing the programming mandate that still serves as the foundation for U.S. outreach, it has one serious drawback: It prohibits domestic dissemination of information designed for foreign consumption, ostensibly so as to ban "domestic propaganda."
lawyer directory