February, 18 2009, 04:45pm EDT
Israel/Egypt: Choking Gaza Harms Civilians
US, EU, Security Council Should Demand Greater Access for Food and Fuel
JERUSALEM/GAZA
Israel should urgently end its unlawful restrictions on desperately
needed humanitarian aid and basic goods entering Gaza, Human Rights
Watch said today. Security concerns do not justify overly broad
limitations on the delivery of food, fuel, and other essential supplies.
Since the end of major military operations on January 18, 2009,
Israel has continued to block the entry of significant amounts of food,
fuel, cooking gas, and construction materials into Gaza, as well as
access by aid workers. The supplies and personnel are needed to
alleviate the suffering of civilians, many of whose homes and
workplaces were destroyed during Israel's recent military operation.
"Israel's major military operation destroyed many lives and
dramatically worsened Gaza's humanitarian crisis," said Fred Abrahams,
senior emergencies researcher at Human Rights Watch, who just spent two
weeks in Gaza. "Security concerns do not justify the collective
punishment of 1.5 million people by keeping out the aid and supplies
they desperately need."
Gaza's current needs are vast. Israel's 22-day "Operation Cast Lead"
damaged or destroyed more than 14,000 homes, 68 government buildings,
and 31 offices of nongovernmental organizations, according to the UN
Development Program (UNDP). Thousands remain homeless. The World Health
Organization says that almost half of the 122 health facilities it
surveyed were damaged or destroyed.
As of February 5, 88 percent of Gaza's 1.5 million people were
registered to receive food aid from the United Nations, with many of
them wholly dependent on this assistance, according to the UN Office
for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
Israel continues to exercise full control of Gaza's borders and
airspace, with the exception of the Rafah crossing with Egypt. While
Israel is entitled to inspect goods going into Gaza, any restrictions
on relief should be for specific security reasons and not to block
genuine humanitarian aid. Overly broad restrictions on basic goods
violate international humanitarian law, which restricts a government
with effective control over a territory from blocking goods essential
to the survival of the civilian population.
The restrictions also violate Israel's duty as an occupying power to
safeguard the health and welfare of the occupied population, and amount
to collective punishment against the civilian population, Human Rights
Watch said.
Egypt has directly contributed to the worsening humanitarian crisis
by restricting humanitarian aid and personnel from entering Gaza
through the Rafah crossing, Human Rights Watch said. After opening the
border partially during the fighting, Egypt closed it again on February
5. Only Gaza residents needing outside medical attention are allowed to
cross, on a case-by-case basis.
Many goods are entering Gaza from Egypt clandestinely through the
network of cross-border tunnels that continue to operate, despite
ongoing Israeli military attempts to destroy them. Media reports
indicate that Egypt may be slowly clamping down on the illegal trade.
Human Rights Watch called on the United States and other influential
governments, as well as the European Union and UN Security Council, to
press Israel and Egypt to stop unlawfully restricting access for
essential supplies.
"The US is the key foreign donor to Israel and Egypt, so the Obama
administration should push for civilians in Gaza to get urgently needed
relief," Abrahams said.
Human Rights Watch also called on Hamas to stop interfering with
relief deliveries inside Gaza. In early February, Hamas seized food and
supplies intended for civilians from the UN and at least one
international humanitarian organization, but subsequently called the
seizures "a mistake" and returned the goods.
Despite Gaza's urgent needs and Hamas's attempts to control aid,
Israel's broad restrictions on the delivery of food, fuel, and other
goods appear without justification by any legitimate security concern.
Since January 18, for example, Israel has blocked shipments of
chickpeas, dates, tea bags, children's puzzles, and macaroni.
Israel also rejected a water purification system donated by the
government of France. According to Gaza's water utility, as of February
16, 50,000 residents had no access to piped water, and an additional
100,000 receive water every seven to 10 days. Shipments of spare parts
are needed before major repairs can be made, the utility said.
De-mining teams have been unable to destroy or isolate some
unexploded Israeli weapons because Israel has denied entry for needed
materials and equipment, OCHA reported on February 16.
According to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), 60 percent of
the 200,000 schoolchildren attending its Gaza schools are without a
full complement of textbooks because Israel has blocked shipments of
paper needed to print the books. The UN agency said that Israel also
blocked the material needed to make plastic bags for food distribution.
Humanitarian aid workers trying to enter Gaza have also faced
unnecessary restrictions imposed by Israel. According to OCHA, of the
178 requests it monitored in January from nongovernmental organizations
to enter Gaza at Erez, the main crossing for people entering Gaza,
Israel approved the entry of only 18 international staff from medical
NGOs, followed by a small number of unexploded ordinance clearance
technicians.
The UN reported that the average number of truckloads per day
entering Gaza reached 117 during the week of February 4-10. This was
far below the daily average of 475 truckloads in May 2007, just prior
to Israel's intensification of the border closure after Hamas's
takeover of Gaza from Fatah.
Israel also continues to restrict supplies of industrial diesel fuel
used to generate electricity, keeping Gaza's only power plant operating
at two-thirds capacity and exacerbating Gaza's already severe
electricity shortage. Israel blocked all petrol, diesel, and cooking
gas into Gaza between February 8 and 14, OCHA said. Electricity cuts
contribute to widespread water access problems.
Israel claims to facilitate aid shipments, but Israeli officials
have repeatedly said they will not allow any aid that they determine
bolsters or legitimizes Hamas. Citing security concerns, Israel
continues to prevent delivery of many construction materials, including
cement, steel, and glass, which prevents aid agencies from starting
desperately needed reconstruction. Israel has also blocked money
transfers into Gaza, although it recently allowed the Ramallah-based
Palestinian Authority to transfer US$43 million to pay the salaries of
officials on its payroll.
Israel's refusal to allow exports from Gaza for more than one year
has contributed heavily to the territory's economic collapse, Human
Rights Watch said. In a one-time exception on February 11, Israel
announced it would allow the shipment of 25,000 cut flowers from Gaza
headed for the Netherlands in time for Valentine's Day.
"Israel's choke-hold on Gaza has destroyed the territory's economy
and is having long-lasting and devastating effects on the lives of
Palestinians," Abrahams said. "Hamas's actions cannot be used to
justify policies that harm the civilian population."
Egypt's restrictions on the movement of goods and people into Gaza
through the Rafah crossing have worsened the situation, Human Rights
Watch said. According to Egyptian medical officials, Egypt allowed
1,003 wounded Gazans to enter Egypt for medical care during the three
weeks of fighting, as well as the delivery of some aid to Gaza and the
entry of humanitarian workers. But Egypt closed the border on February
5 without specifying a date or conditions for opening it again.
The Egyptian government has also detained without charge Egyptian
activists who campaigned for the government to open the Rafah crossing.
On February 3, the country's High Administrative Court supported the
government's position that Egyptian activists could not transport
medical and other aid to Gaza, and that these could only be transferred
"through official channels."
Hamas has also hindered the delivery of aid and supplies. According
to the UN relief agency, on February 3 Hamas police seized over 3,500
blankets and 406 food parcels after the agency's personnel refused to
give those supplies to the Hamas-run Ministry of Social Affairs. Two
days later, Hamas seized 200 tons of rice and flour from the agency's
aid trucks at the Kerem Shalom crossing, causing the agency to suspend
all aid deliveries. On February 6, a Hamas official said its forces had
seized the aid "by mistake." The agency renewed aid deliveries on
February 9, after Hamas returned the aid and gave assurances that
seizures would not happen again.
An official with an international humanitarian organization working
in Gaza told Human Rights Watch that in early February Hamas had
confiscated one of its aid shipments, though it was subsequently
returned. Hamas retracted an initial demand that the organization
provide information about the Palestinian groups that would distribute
the aid.
"Hamas should not confiscate or otherwise interfere in the delivery
of aid," Abrahams said. "Such actions only raise concerns that aid to
Gaza won't reach the civilian population in need."
International humanitarian law requires parties to a conflict to
allow and facilitate the rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian
aid to the civilian population. Parties are required to allow the free
passage of food relief to civilians at risk; starvation of the civilian
population may not be used as a method of warfare. A party may take
steps to control the content and delivery of humanitarian aid, such as
to ensure that consignments do not include weapons. But it may not
refuse consent on arbitrary grounds.
Israel remains an occupying power in the Gaza Strip because it
continues to exercise effective control over Gaza's airspace, sea
space, and land borders, as well as the territory's electricity, water
and sewage systems. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, an occupying
power is obligated to ensure the health and well-being of the civilian
population to the fullest extent possible.
A deliberate refusal to permit access for relief supplies can
constitute collective punishment or an illegal reprisal against the
civilian population. The prohibition on collective punishment does not
just refer to criminal penalties, according to the International
Committee of the Red Cross, "but penalties of any kind inflicted on
persons or entire groups of persons, in defiance of the most elementary
principles of humanity, for acts that these persons have not committed."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Joe Lieberman, Iraq War Cheerleader and Killer of Public Option, Dead at 82
"Joe Lieberman's legacy will live on as your medical debt."
Mar 27, 2024
While current and former officials across the U.S. political spectrum shared praise for and fond memories of former Sen. Joe Lieberman in response to news of his death on Wednesday, critics highlighted how some of his key positions led to the deaths of many others.
Lieberman's family said the 82-year-old died at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital after a fall at his home in the Bronx. He served in the Connecticut Senate, as the state's attorney general, and in the U.S. Senate—initially as a Democrat and eventually as an Independent. He was also Democratic former Vice President Al Gore's running mate in the 2000 presidential election.
"Up until the very end, Joe Lieberman enjoyed the high-quality, government-financed healthcare that he worked diligently to deny the rest of us. That's his legacy," said Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, which advocates for universal, single-payer healthcare.
As Warren Gunnels, majority staff director for Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.),
explained, "Joe Lieberman led the effort to ensure the Affordable Care Act did not include a public option or a reduction in the Medicare eligibility age to 55."
Noting that Lieberman also lied about the presence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq—which was used to justify the 2003 U.S. invasion—Gunnels asked, "How many people unnecessarily died as a result?"
He was far from alone in highlighting the two defining positions.
The Lever's David Sirota declared, "RIP Joe Lieberman, Iraq War cheerleader who led the fight to make sure Medicare was not extended to millions of Americans who desperately needed the kind of healthcare coverage he enjoyed in the Senate."
The Debt Collective said on social media that "Joe Lieberman killed so many people when he killed the public option. Not to mention all the people he killed by cheerleading every war and every lie that led to war. A truly horrible person with a shameful legacy."
Journalist Jon Schwarz pointed out that Lieberman continued to lie about the WMDs long after the claims were debunked.
FormerMSNBC host Mehdi Hasan noted that Lieberman declined an opportunity to apologize for the disastrous war, sharing a clip from his on-camera interview with the ex-senator in 2021.
And please don\u2019t give me this \u2018don\u2019t speak ill of the dead\u2019 stuff - 1) I\u2019m not speaking ill, I\u2019m stating facts, and 2) public figures are public figures, and their obits reflect their legacies and so we should be honest in our accounts of their legacies. Not offensive but honest— (@)
"We lost a giant today. I often disagreed with Joe Lieberman but he was always honorable in the way he called for American troops to murder people abroad so he could get his jollies," said Matt Stoller of the American Economic Liberties Project in a series of sarcastic social media posts.
"Joe Lieberman balanced his love of other people fighting in immoral wars with a commitment to preventing Americans from getting healthcare," Stoller added. "Even after his Senate career, he showed his strong democratic values by lobbying for Chinese telecom firms. We will miss this man."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Enough Is Enough': Ireland Joins ICJ Genocide Case Against Israel
"What we saw on October 7 in Israel, and what we are seeing in Gaza now, represents the blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale," said one top Irish official.
Mar 27, 2024
Citing Israel's "blatant" human rights violations in Gaza, Ireland's second-highest-ranking official said Wednesday that the country will join the South Africa-led genocide case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
Irish Tánaiste Micheál Martin—the equivalent of a deputy prime minister in other parliamentary nations—said that Ireland decided to intervene in the case after analyzing the "legal and policy issues" pertaining to the case under review by the United Nations' top court.
"It is for the court to determine whether genocide is being committed," Martin—who also serves as Ireland's foreign and defense minister—said in a statement. "But I want to be clear in reiterating what I have said many times in the last few months; what we saw on October 7 in Israel, and what we are seeing in Gaza now, represents the blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale."
Martin continued:
The taking of hostages. The purposeful withholding of humanitarian assistance to civilians. The targeting of civilians and of civilian infrastructure. The indiscriminate use of explosive weapons in populated areas. The use of civilian objects for military purposes. The collective punishment of an entire population.
The list goes on. It has to stop. The view of the international community is clear. Enough is enough. The U.N. Security Council has demanded an immediate cease-fire, the unconditional release of hostages, and the lifting of all barriers to the provision of humanitarian assistance at scale. The European Council has echoed this call.
South Africa's case—which is supported by over 30 countries, the Arab League, African Union, and others—incisively details Israel's conduct in the war, including the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, mostly women and children; the wounding of tens of thousands more; the forcible displacement of 90% of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million people; and the inflicting of conditions leading to widespread starvation and disease. The filing also cited numerous genocidal statements by Israeli officials.
On January 26, the ICJ issued a preliminary ruling that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza and ordered its government and military to prevent genocidal acts. Palestinian and international human rights defenders say Israel has ignored the order, pointing to more than 30,000 men, women, and children killed or wounded in Gaza since January 26.
A draft report
released this week by the U.N.'s Human Rights Council found "reasonable grounds to believe" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a move that came on the same day as the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire in the ongoing war.
"The situation could not be more stark; half the population of Gaza face imminent famine and 100% of the population face acute food insecurity," said Martin. "As the U.N. secretary-general said as he inspected long lines of blocked relief trucks waiting to enter Gaza during his visit to Rafah at the weekend: 'It is time to truly flood Gaza with lifesaving aid. The choice is clear: surge or starvation.' I echo his words today."
In a St. Partick's Day White House meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden—a staunch supporter of Israel—Irish Toaiseach (Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar, who announced earlier this month that he would soon step down, said that "the Irish people are deeply troubled about the catastrophe that's unfolding before our eyes in Gaza."
"And when I travel the world, leaders often ask me why the Irish have such empathy for the Palestinian people," he added. "And the answer is simple: We see our history in their eyes—a story of displacement, of dispossession and national identity questioned and denied, forced emigration, discrimination, and now hunger."
Keep ReadingShow Less
House Democrat Calls GOP Budget a 'Blueprint for a Dystopian Hellscape'
Rep. Don Beyer warns the plan "would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
Mar 27, 2024
As Republicans on Wednesday set their sights on a key seat opening up in the U.S. House of Representatives, the chamber's senior Democrat on the congressional Joint Economic Committee put out a blistering takedown of a top GOP budget proposal for the next fiscal year.
Congressman Don Beyer (D-Va.) took aim at the 180-page "Fiscal Sanity to Save America" plan released last week by the Republican Study Committee (RSC)—which includes about 80% of GOP House members—following proposals from Democratic President Joe Biden and House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas).
"The Republican Study Committee budget is a blueprint for a dystopian hellscape," he warned. "The vision offered by this group, which counts 4 in 5 House Republicans as members, would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
RSC proposals to "dramatically weaken healthcare," Beyer noted, include turning Medicare into a voucher plan and rolling back Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions that cut costs for seniors; repealing tax subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and the law's protections for people with preexisting conditions; and transforming Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program into block grants to states.
As Common Dreams has reported, in addition to seeking cuts to Medicare and Social Security—while claiming to do nothing of the sort—the RSC has also launched a full-fledged assault on reproductive healthcare and rights, promoting 42 bills that would ban abortions after 15 weeks or even earlier, require unnecessary ultrasounds and 24-hour waiting periods, prohibit the use of fetal stem cells for research, and threaten access to in vitro fertilization, among other restrictions.
In addition to attacking reproductive freedom and key programs for seniors and low-income families, Beyer highlighted, the RSC wants to "weaken public health, public safety, and environmental protections," while "cutting taxes for the wealthy, by a lot."
The RSC advocates ending green tax credits from the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act as well as slashing money for Community Oriented Policing Services and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The committee also calls for permanently lowering taxes for the ultrarich, indexing capital gains taxes to inflation, repealing the estate tax, rolling back the IRA's corporate alternative minimum tax, and eliminating funding intended to help the Internal Revenue Service catch wealthy tax cheats.
"Democrats believe there is a better way to get our fiscal house in order without betraying our values," said Beyer. "That starts with making smart investments in our people and our future while demanding that the rich and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. The contrast between the Democratic approach and this Republican budget could not possibly be clearer."
Biden's budget blueprint—released as he prepares for an electoral rematch against former Republican President Donald Trump, who infamously cut taxes for rich people and corporations—proposes a 25% minimum tax for individuals with wealth of more than $100 million, along with ending capital income tax breaks and closing other loopholes.
Polling results released Tuesday by Morning Consult show that a majority of voters across party lines in key swing states support raising taxes on people who make more than $400,000 per year.
Biden and the divided Congress this past weekend narrowly avoided a government shutdown by passing a long-delayed spending package. Fiscal year 2025 is set to begin in October, setting up another election-year fight over funding.
In what's been
dubbed the "Great Resignation," a growing number of House Republicans have announced that they are not seeking reelection or even exited their seats early—shrinking the party's already slim majority in the lower chamber.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular