February, 13 2009, 02:08pm EDT
DR Congo: Rwandan Rebels Slaughter Over 100 Civilians
Congolese and Rwandan Forces Should Make Protecting Civilians a Priority
NEW YORK
The rebel Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR)
brutally slaughtered at least 100 Congolese civilians in the Kivu
provinces of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo between January 20
and February 8, 2009, Human Rights Watch said today.
Human Rights Watch researchers interviewed dozens of victims and
witnesses who recently arrived from neighboring areas of Ufamandu and
Walowaluanda (North Kivu province) and from Ziralo (South Kivu
province) at displaced persons camps near Goma, the capital of North
Kivu. Their accounts are the first reports of killings of civilians by
the FDLR since joint operations between Rwandan Defense Forces and the
Congolese army against the group began on January 20. Some of the
civilians died during the fighting between these forces.
"The FDLR have a very ugly past, but we haven't seen this level of
violence in years," said Anneke Van Woudenberg, senior researcher in
the Africa division at Human Rights Watch. "We've documented many
abuses by FDLR forces, but these are killings of ghastly proportions."
The joint military operations are intended to dismantle Rwandan
armed groups that have been present in eastern Congo since 1994. Some
leaders of the FDLR are accused of having participated in the 1994
Rwandan genocide.
As Rwandan and Congolese coalition forces advanced toward the FDLR's
former headquarters at Kibua, in Ufamandu, North Kivu, the FDLR
abducted scores of local residents from neighboring villages and took
them to their camp, apparently intending to use them as human shields
against the impending attack. Witnesses said that when coalition forces
attacked Kibua on January 27, the trapped civilians tried to flee. The
FDLR hacked many civilians to death and others died in the crossfire.
One witness at Kibua saw FDLR combatants kill at least seven people,
including a pregnant woman, whose womb was slit open. Another saw an
FDLR combatant batter a 10-year-old girl to death against a brick wall.
As the FDLR fled the military confrontation, they abducted dozens of civilians, forcing them to carry their goods.
In Remeka village in Ufamandu, the FDLR rebels called a meeting at
which they accused the population, local leaders and the Mai Mai armed
group with whom they had been allied, of having betrayed them. A local
resident present at the meeting said the FDLR told residents they would
not be allowed to leave and that they were "sharpening their spears and
machetes." Another said, "The FDLR told us that if they were shot at by
anyone that they would hold us responsible and kill us."
Following the meeting, the FDLR erected barriers to prevent people
from fleeing. When some tried to flee, the FDLR attacked them, killing
dozens with guns, rocket-propelled grenades, and machetes. "As I ran, I
saw bodies everywhere - men, women and children," said one witness.
"They had all been killed by the FDLR."
FDLR combatants also raped more than a dozen women whom they accused
of having joined the government side against them. For instance, in
southern Masisi territory (North Kivu), on January 27, FDLR combatants
raped and killed a woman and then raped her 9-year-old daughter.
The message given at the Remeka meeting was repeated in a letter
sent from the FDLR to the governor of South Kivu in early February. In
the letter, the group warned that if the local population collaborated
with the Rwandan army they would be considered the FDLR's "mortal
enemy" and treated as a "belligerent party."
Following the attacks in Ufamandu, FDLR forces fled through
Walowaluanda in Walikale territory to the Ziralo region in South Kivu,
where they continued to kill civilians. A woman from Lulere village in
Ziralo told Human Rights Watch that the FDLR said they would not leave
Congo without "first exterminating the Congolese people." The FDLR
forces then killed her 73-year-old father and 80-year-old uncle by
smashing their skulls with small hoes.
Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that FDLR forces abducted at least
50 civilians in early February in Lulere, Mianda, Kalingita, Katale,
and Kirambo villages, on the border between North and South Kivu
provinces. They were reportedly taken to Kinono forest in Ziralo, South
Kivu. Their fate is unknown.
The Congolese government nominally leads the joint operations
against the FDLR, but the coalition troops that attacked the FDLR in
Ufamandu were largely soldiers from the Rwandan Defense Forces. These
Rwandan soldiers were allegedly responsible for having raped several
women since the start of operations against the FDLR.
"The Tutsi [Rwandan] soldiers accused me of being the wife of an
FDLR combatant, just because I'm Hutu," said one woman who was raped by
a Rwandan army soldier in Remeka. "After they raped me, they burned my
house, saying it was the house of an FDLR. I was pregnant, but there's
no more movement in my womb. I think I have lost my first child."
The United Nations Mission in Congo, MONUC, has a mandate to protect
civilians and provides logistical support to the Congolese army, but it
was not involved in planning the joint operation. Although the
coalition forces say they are open to sharing information with MONUC
about their campaign, such information-sharing has been scant and too
late to permit the UN forces to be able to plan for providing the
needed protection.
In November 2008, the UN Security Council authorized an additional
3,000 troops for the mission to help carry out its mandate to protect
civilians. None of these additional troops have yet arrived.
International humanitarian law - the laws of war - applies to both
states and non-state armed groups. Parties to a conflict must take all
feasible steps to minimize harm to the civilian population, including
permitting civilians to flee to safer areas. The laws of war prohibit
murder, rape and abductions. Those who commit such acts are responsible
for war crimes.
"Protection of civilians needs to be given a top priority in the
military operations to help prevent, once again, Congolese civilians
paying the highest price," said Van Woudenberg.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular