EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167 |
GOP "Filibuster Hypocrisy"
ROBERT PARRY
Parry is editor of ConsortiumNews.com, a reader-supported investigative webpage. He recently wrote the piece "The GOP's Filibuster Hypocrisy," which states: "Though seemingly forgotten by most TV talking heads, it was only three years ago, when the Republicans had control of both the White House and Congress -- and 'filibuster' was a dirty word.
"It was usually coupled with 'obstructionist' amid demands that any of George W. Bush's proposals deserved 'an up-or-down vote.'
"Yet now, with the Democrats holding the White House and Congress, the Republicans and the Washington press corps have come to view the filibuster fondly, as a valued American tradition, a time-honored part of a healthy legislative process.
"Today, it's seen as a good thing that Democrats must muster 60 votes in the Senate to pass almost anything."
Parry's latest piece is "The GOP's Jihad on Obama." His books include "Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush," written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat. Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. More Information
JOHN BERG
Professor
and chair of the government department at Suffolk University in Boston,
Berg is author of "Unequal Struggle: Class, Gender, Race and Power in
the U.S. Congress." He said today: "The filibuster is an undemocratic
relic. During the '50s and '60s, the filibuster was used by racists to
block civil rights laws, and so no one used it for years after that.
Then, some anti-war senators like Wayne Morse used it, but only in
limited circumstances. It wasn't used frequently until Bob Dole used it
constantly during the Clinton presidency.
"There ought to be a way whereby a strong point can be made by a few, but a determined majority can ultimately work its will. Part of the problem now is that a filibuster used to be a real filibuster, senators actually had to make speeches, or at least read out of the phone book -- they'd bring out the mattresses. Now, the minority party just says they're doing a filibuster on an issue and everyone acts like that means they have to move to other business." More Information
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

1 Comment so far
Show AllI think it's time for the Democrats to call the Republican bluff the next time they threaten to filibuster. Make them actually do it. The public is not going to be amused and they know it. I bet they don't do it more than once. They have members who will be up for election in 2010 who will see it's negative results and cave in. At least test them now, while they are as unpopular as the Taliban they want to imitate.