|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: The Hunger Project |
Non-Profit Advocates for Women Farmers at Major International Food Security Conference
NEW YORK - January 29 - Since 2006, the number of undernourished people in the world has risen from 852 million to 963 million, due primarily to 2008's world food price crisis. In an effort to "design a road map" to reverse this alarming trend and achieve global food security, the Government of Spain and the United Nations hosted the "High Level Meeting on Food Security for All" on January 26-27 in Madrid. The Hunger Project, a non-profit organization which works with grassroots people in the developing world to create their own, sustainable strategies for ending their own hunger, participated in this meeting along with governments, the private sector and civil society from more than 125 countries.
At the conference, The Hunger Project and several other civil society organizations underscored the need for the world community to dramatically increase support for small-scale farmers, with a majority of that support going to women. Women grow the majority of the food used for household consumption in the developing world, yet only a small fraction of foreign aid reaches them.
In the conference's final statement, it was recognized that "the special problems faced by...female small farmers need to be addressed effectively" and that it was important to include "marginalized and excluded men, women, and children and indigenous groups in this process, giving them voice so that their views are prioritized when analyzing the problems, searching for viable solutions and implementing them."
Mrs. Åsa Skogström Feldt, Madrid conference participant and Country Director of The Hunger Project-Sweden, remarks that "It is mainly women who run family farms and their needs and priorities must be recognized. It is encouraging that the special needs of women in the developing world were recognized at the Madrid meeting."
Skogström Feldt says that at the Madrid meeting, "The Hunger Project was the voice of people living in chronic hunger and poverty who rely on the food they grow for sustenance. People do not want to get handouts. They want to be empowered to get in charge of their own future. Food and nutrition are not only major issues in their own right, but are also closely interlinked with all the other Millennium Development Goals.""
Jill Lester, President and CEO of The Hunger Project, comments "that to ensure food security, rural communities must be empowered to become resilient and self-reliant. Women hold the key to sustainable rural development and action is needed now if further crises are to be averted."
The Hunger Project works in countries in Africa, South Asia and Latin America to end hunger and extreme poverty. Hunger Project programs focus on three essential elements for integrated, sustainable development: mobilizing people at the grassroots level to build self-reliance; empowering women as key change agents; and forging effective partnerships with local government. For more information about The Hunger Project please visit www.thp.org.
For more information about the Madrid meeting please www.ransa2009.org.
To interview Jill Lester or Åsa Skogström Feldt regarding The Hunger Project's participation in Madrid conference or views on issues pertaining to food security, please contact Anastasia Andrzejewski at 212-251-9129 or aha@thp.org.

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
1 Comment so far
Show AllVery crucial work!
But ...
I see this: "Since 2006, the number of undernourished people in the world has risen from 852 million to 963 million, due primarily to 2008's world food price crisis."
But then we have this article about women who are FARMERS. Sorry, but we must be very clear about a few things. High farm prices are not bad for these farmers, they're good. Surely such a article should explain this! (And over and over, just google "food crisis," or even "food price crisis," this is not mentioned. Have I mentioned this more myself than all the rest (mainstream media, progressives) combined? Just google it and see!)
Ok, what else of the standard omissions do we see? No standard for fair trade farm prices! The implication is only that high prices are bad. Ok, what else? No mention of dumping, exporting at a loss, at low, below-cost prices, for decades causing extreme poverty in rural economies (LDCs are 73% rural). Yes, at root it's a low-price/poverty crisis, not a high-farm-prices-for-these-women-farmers crisis!
FAIR, Fairness and Accuracy in the Media, did exposes on how mainstream media first correctly said the US pulled inspectors out of Iraq, then later the very same media sources claimed Saddam kicked the inspectors out. In this case, progressives and mainstream media were all on the anti-dumping bandwagon a few years ago, then switched to basically callling for dumping as an end to the "food price crisis."
Ok, dumping: U.S. farmers lost money in the market on corn, wheat, cotton, rice, soybeans, grain sorghum, barley and oats 1981-2006 except 1996. USDA-ERS: http://www dot ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/testpick.htm (net/acre x acres, then add losses and gains for the 8 crops). Why? These commodities lack "price responsiveness" so we need price floors and supply managment (adequate New Deal or Harkin-Gephardt farm programs-they were lowered 1953-1995 and then ended).
Ok, a fair-trade, living-wage standard: The traditional U.S. standard is 100% of parity. In September 2005 we had corn 25% of parity, cotton and rice, 26% of parity, soybeans and wheat: 32% of parity. We needed quadrupling or tripling for a living wage. The standard of $4 per day to live on, or $8, let alone $2 or $1 is absurd, the result of dumping since 1981 devastating rural countries (LEAST Developed Countries, 73% rural in 2005, 82.7% rural in 1980).
We need to feed the world, paying fair trade prices to LDC farmers. We need Harkin to mentor fellow Iowan and city slicker Vilsack on this, and Obama. We need Harkin to lead us in NOT losing money on exports, not dumping (subsidies don't cause this, the lack of price floors does, see nffc.net, but we don't need any compensatory subsidies with fair trade pricing). So this is where the money can come from, profits on exports to foreign processors and livestock interests AND no compensatory commodity subsidies in farm bill.
Other than these concerns, it's a fine article.