EMAIL SIGN UP!
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Friends of the Earth Nick Berning, 202-222-0748 |
Senate Attempts to Waste up to $50 Billion in Stimulus Funds on Preemptive Bailout for Nuclear Industry
Friends of the Earth slams proposed bailout, which would have no significant stimulative effect, as ‘unconscionable’
The move was strongly criticized by Friends of the Earth President Brent Blackwelder.
“The nuclear industry has given millions of dollars to politicians, an investment that appears to be paying off,” Blackwelder said. "Senators are supposed to be fixing the economy but instead they’re offering the nuclear industry a $50 billion gift that will create virtually no near-term jobs. It's unconscionable. Lobbyists are probably popping champagne corks as we speak.”
This stealth, preemptive bailout comes in the form of a $50 billion expansion of federal loan guarantees for “advanced low-carbon technology,” much of which would likely go to helping energy firms secure financing for reactor construction. The industry has been unable to secure substantial financing from the private sector in the absence of these guarantees.
Nuclear industry executives admit nuclear power is so financially risky that federal loan guarantees are the only way new reactors will get built. For example, Michael J. Wallace, the co-chief executive of UniStar Nuclear, told the New York Times in 2007 that “without loan guarantees we will not build nuclear power plants.” Unfortunately, the Congressional Research Service says such guarantees threaten to leave taxpayers with “potentially large losses.” The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the risk of default on a nuclear loan guarantee is “very high—well above 50 percent.”
“Now is not the time for another bailout boondoggle,” Blackwelder said. “Nuclear power is the most expensive form of energy there is. It takes 10 years or more to build a reactor, so it is impossible to claim with a straight face that this preemptive bailout has anything to do with creating jobs. Senate appropriators’ decision to include such wasteful spending in the stimulus is an example of Washington at its worst.”
The Senate appropriators’ vote does not mean that this nuclear industry bailout will take place. Stimulus language being considered by the House of Representatives does not include this bailout, and the disparity will be resolved in conference committee after each house passes its own legislative language.
This fall, Friends of the Earth released an ad opposing a preemptive bailout for the nuclear industry. That ad can be viewed here: http://action.foe.org/t/6545/content.jsp?content_KEY=4633.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

1 Comment so far
Show AllNuclear energy is one of the most expensive option, but it is also one of the most DANGEROUS option.
Furthermore 1 expert in resources recently said (In a coast to coast interview) that we would run out of Uranium by 2050, too early for the full life of a reactor. Perhaps it's pessimistic : a guest on Rense in 2002 said we had Uranium for 500 years!
NOTE THAT the building of a costly reprocessing plant (same as in france) would NEEDED if another plant is built to take care of the waste...
Building 2 plants does create jobs for a long time (10 Y) so the argument, on jobs, may be fallacious.
Anyway, dirty,dangerous plants and VERY dirty mining: JUST SAY NO!